创伤人群中呼吸机相关肺炎的报道率并不能反映临床显著的呼吸道感染。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
American Surgeon Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-28 DOI:10.1177/00031348251363531
Alison K Mortemore, Prashanth Balaraman, Emily McGee, Kenneth Chiep, Andrew Gross, Andrew Suh, Danielle Tatum, Patrick McGrew, Jeanette Zhang, Sharven Taghavi, Kevin N Harrell
{"title":"创伤人群中呼吸机相关肺炎的报道率并不能反映临床显著的呼吸道感染。","authors":"Alison K Mortemore, Prashanth Balaraman, Emily McGee, Kenneth Chiep, Andrew Gross, Andrew Suh, Danielle Tatum, Patrick McGrew, Jeanette Zhang, Sharven Taghavi, Kevin N Harrell","doi":"10.1177/00031348251363531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundVentilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a common intensive care unit (ICU) infection linked to increased morbidity and mortality. Trauma patients may be at a higher risk for VAP due to factors like chest wall injury, pulmonary contusions, and aspiration risk. Limited data exists on this population despite VAP being a quality metric reported to the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP). We hypothesized that reported VAP rates will be lower than clinically significant infections.MethodsThis retrospective study analyzed intubated adult trauma patients at a single Level 1 trauma center between January 2019 and December 2023. VAP was defined as at least moderate growth of a speciated organism on respiratory culture obtained 2 or more days after intubation. The primary aim of this study is to compare trauma registry reported VAP rates with clinically significant respiratory infection.ResultsOver 5 years, 980 patients had a median age of 42 years, sustaining blunt injuries (71.3%) with a median injury severity score of 20. While the trauma registry reported VAP in 8.3% of patients, clinical VAP was identified in 23.7%. When comparing the trauma registry ability to predict the presence of clinically significant respiratory infection, VAP predicted clinically significant respiratory infection with only 29.2% sensitivity, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.640.ConclusionsVAP is underreported in trauma registries. Improved definitions, reporting standards, and diagnostic use of respiratory cultures are essential to enhance the reliability and utility of VAP as a quality metric and study tool in trauma patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"1822-1827"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reported Ventilator Associated Pneumonia Rates in the Trauma Population do not Reflect Clinically Significant Respiratory Infection.\",\"authors\":\"Alison K Mortemore, Prashanth Balaraman, Emily McGee, Kenneth Chiep, Andrew Gross, Andrew Suh, Danielle Tatum, Patrick McGrew, Jeanette Zhang, Sharven Taghavi, Kevin N Harrell\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00031348251363531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundVentilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a common intensive care unit (ICU) infection linked to increased morbidity and mortality. Trauma patients may be at a higher risk for VAP due to factors like chest wall injury, pulmonary contusions, and aspiration risk. Limited data exists on this population despite VAP being a quality metric reported to the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP). We hypothesized that reported VAP rates will be lower than clinically significant infections.MethodsThis retrospective study analyzed intubated adult trauma patients at a single Level 1 trauma center between January 2019 and December 2023. VAP was defined as at least moderate growth of a speciated organism on respiratory culture obtained 2 or more days after intubation. The primary aim of this study is to compare trauma registry reported VAP rates with clinically significant respiratory infection.ResultsOver 5 years, 980 patients had a median age of 42 years, sustaining blunt injuries (71.3%) with a median injury severity score of 20. While the trauma registry reported VAP in 8.3% of patients, clinical VAP was identified in 23.7%. When comparing the trauma registry ability to predict the presence of clinically significant respiratory infection, VAP predicted clinically significant respiratory infection with only 29.2% sensitivity, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.640.ConclusionsVAP is underreported in trauma registries. Improved definitions, reporting standards, and diagnostic use of respiratory cultures are essential to enhance the reliability and utility of VAP as a quality metric and study tool in trauma patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Surgeon\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1822-1827\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Surgeon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251363531\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251363531","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)是一种常见的重症监护病房(ICU)感染,与发病率和死亡率增加有关。由于胸壁损伤、肺挫伤和误吸风险等因素,创伤患者发生VAP的风险更高。尽管VAP是向创伤质量改善计划(TQIP)报告的质量指标,但关于这一人群的数据有限。我们假设报告的VAP率将低于临床显著感染。方法回顾性分析2019年1月至2023年12月在某一级创伤中心插管的成人创伤患者。VAP被定义为在插管后2天或更长时间内,在呼吸培养物上至少有一种特定有机体的中等生长。本研究的主要目的是比较创伤登记报告的VAP率和临床显著的呼吸道感染。结果随访5年,980例患者中位年龄为42岁,持续钝性损伤(71.3%),中位损伤严重程度评分为20分。创伤登记处报告的VAP发生率为8.3%,而临床VAP发生率为23.7%。在比较创伤登记预测临床显著性呼吸道感染的能力时,VAP预测临床显著性呼吸道感染的敏感性仅为29.2%,受者工作特征曲线下面积为0.640。结论创伤登记中svap的报道不足。改进呼吸培养的定义、报告标准和诊断使用对于提高VAP作为创伤患者质量度量和研究工具的可靠性和实用性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reported Ventilator Associated Pneumonia Rates in the Trauma Population do not Reflect Clinically Significant Respiratory Infection.

BackgroundVentilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a common intensive care unit (ICU) infection linked to increased morbidity and mortality. Trauma patients may be at a higher risk for VAP due to factors like chest wall injury, pulmonary contusions, and aspiration risk. Limited data exists on this population despite VAP being a quality metric reported to the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP). We hypothesized that reported VAP rates will be lower than clinically significant infections.MethodsThis retrospective study analyzed intubated adult trauma patients at a single Level 1 trauma center between January 2019 and December 2023. VAP was defined as at least moderate growth of a speciated organism on respiratory culture obtained 2 or more days after intubation. The primary aim of this study is to compare trauma registry reported VAP rates with clinically significant respiratory infection.ResultsOver 5 years, 980 patients had a median age of 42 years, sustaining blunt injuries (71.3%) with a median injury severity score of 20. While the trauma registry reported VAP in 8.3% of patients, clinical VAP was identified in 23.7%. When comparing the trauma registry ability to predict the presence of clinically significant respiratory infection, VAP predicted clinically significant respiratory infection with only 29.2% sensitivity, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.640.ConclusionsVAP is underreported in trauma registries. Improved definitions, reporting standards, and diagnostic use of respiratory cultures are essential to enhance the reliability and utility of VAP as a quality metric and study tool in trauma patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Surgeon
American Surgeon 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
期刊介绍: The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信