Xiao-qin Liu, Yi Gu, Yu-fei Zhang, Wei Shen, Zhi-chun Gu, Ming-kang Zhong, Hong-yan Ding, Chun-lai Ma
{"title":"用显色抗xa法和UHPLC-MS /MS法评估中国房颤患者利伐沙班血药浓度","authors":"Xiao-qin Liu, Yi Gu, Yu-fei Zhang, Wei Shen, Zhi-chun Gu, Ming-kang Zhong, Hong-yan Ding, Chun-lai Ma","doi":"10.1111/bcpt.70088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Accurate quantification of rivaroxaban concentration is essential in some specific clinical situations. A prospective study was conducted to compare the rivaroxaban concentration measured by Zhenyuan anti-Xa assay with that by reference methods (ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry [UHPLC–MS/MS] and Biophen DiXal) in 243 plasma samples from 182 patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Zhenyuan anti-Xa assays demonstrated less bias versus reference methods in samples with concentrations exceeding 50 μg/L compared to those in the < 50 μg/L group. Strong correlations were observed between Zhenyuan anti-Xa assays and both reference methods (Pearson's correlation coefficient 0.976 and 0.988, respectively). However, Bland–Altman analysis revealed systematic underestimation by Zhenyuan anti-Xa assays, with mean biases of 41.87 μg/L (vs. UHPLC–MS/MS) and 26.76 μg/L (vs. Biophen DiXal), particularly pronounced at higher levels. Rivaroxaban concentration in patients from clinical settings was with greater variability compared to the expected ranges. Patients taking underdose of rivaroxaban are more likely to have a trough concentration falling below the targeted therapeutic range.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8733,"journal":{"name":"Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology","volume":"137 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Rivaroxaban Plasma Concentration Using Chromogenic Anti-Xa Assays and UHPLC–MS/MS in Chinese Patients With Atrial Fibrillation\",\"authors\":\"Xiao-qin Liu, Yi Gu, Yu-fei Zhang, Wei Shen, Zhi-chun Gu, Ming-kang Zhong, Hong-yan Ding, Chun-lai Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bcpt.70088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Accurate quantification of rivaroxaban concentration is essential in some specific clinical situations. A prospective study was conducted to compare the rivaroxaban concentration measured by Zhenyuan anti-Xa assay with that by reference methods (ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry [UHPLC–MS/MS] and Biophen DiXal) in 243 plasma samples from 182 patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Zhenyuan anti-Xa assays demonstrated less bias versus reference methods in samples with concentrations exceeding 50 μg/L compared to those in the < 50 μg/L group. Strong correlations were observed between Zhenyuan anti-Xa assays and both reference methods (Pearson's correlation coefficient 0.976 and 0.988, respectively). However, Bland–Altman analysis revealed systematic underestimation by Zhenyuan anti-Xa assays, with mean biases of 41.87 μg/L (vs. UHPLC–MS/MS) and 26.76 μg/L (vs. Biophen DiXal), particularly pronounced at higher levels. Rivaroxaban concentration in patients from clinical settings was with greater variability compared to the expected ranges. Patients taking underdose of rivaroxaban are more likely to have a trough concentration falling below the targeted therapeutic range.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"137 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcpt.70088\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcpt.70088","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessment of Rivaroxaban Plasma Concentration Using Chromogenic Anti-Xa Assays and UHPLC–MS/MS in Chinese Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
Accurate quantification of rivaroxaban concentration is essential in some specific clinical situations. A prospective study was conducted to compare the rivaroxaban concentration measured by Zhenyuan anti-Xa assay with that by reference methods (ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry [UHPLC–MS/MS] and Biophen DiXal) in 243 plasma samples from 182 patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Zhenyuan anti-Xa assays demonstrated less bias versus reference methods in samples with concentrations exceeding 50 μg/L compared to those in the < 50 μg/L group. Strong correlations were observed between Zhenyuan anti-Xa assays and both reference methods (Pearson's correlation coefficient 0.976 and 0.988, respectively). However, Bland–Altman analysis revealed systematic underestimation by Zhenyuan anti-Xa assays, with mean biases of 41.87 μg/L (vs. UHPLC–MS/MS) and 26.76 μg/L (vs. Biophen DiXal), particularly pronounced at higher levels. Rivaroxaban concentration in patients from clinical settings was with greater variability compared to the expected ranges. Patients taking underdose of rivaroxaban are more likely to have a trough concentration falling below the targeted therapeutic range.
期刊介绍:
Basic & Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology is an independent journal, publishing original scientific research in all fields of toxicology, basic and clinical pharmacology. This includes experimental animal pharmacology and toxicology and molecular (-genetic), biochemical and cellular pharmacology and toxicology. It also includes all aspects of clinical pharmacology: pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, therapeutic drug monitoring, drug/drug interactions, pharmacogenetics/-genomics, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacovigilance, pharmacoeconomics, randomized controlled clinical trials and rational pharmacotherapy. For all compounds used in the studies, the chemical constitution and composition should be known, also for natural compounds.