用显色抗xa法和UHPLC-MS /MS法评估中国房颤患者利伐沙班血药浓度

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Xiao-qin Liu, Yi Gu, Yu-fei Zhang, Wei Shen, Zhi-chun Gu, Ming-kang Zhong, Hong-yan Ding, Chun-lai Ma
{"title":"用显色抗xa法和UHPLC-MS /MS法评估中国房颤患者利伐沙班血药浓度","authors":"Xiao-qin Liu,&nbsp;Yi Gu,&nbsp;Yu-fei Zhang,&nbsp;Wei Shen,&nbsp;Zhi-chun Gu,&nbsp;Ming-kang Zhong,&nbsp;Hong-yan Ding,&nbsp;Chun-lai Ma","doi":"10.1111/bcpt.70088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Accurate quantification of rivaroxaban concentration is essential in some specific clinical situations. A prospective study was conducted to compare the rivaroxaban concentration measured by Zhenyuan anti-Xa assay with that by reference methods (ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry [UHPLC–MS/MS] and Biophen DiXal) in 243 plasma samples from 182 patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Zhenyuan anti-Xa assays demonstrated less bias versus reference methods in samples with concentrations exceeding 50 μg/L compared to those in the &lt; 50 μg/L group. Strong correlations were observed between Zhenyuan anti-Xa assays and both reference methods (Pearson's correlation coefficient 0.976 and 0.988, respectively). However, Bland–Altman analysis revealed systematic underestimation by Zhenyuan anti-Xa assays, with mean biases of 41.87 μg/L (vs. UHPLC–MS/MS) and 26.76 μg/L (vs. Biophen DiXal), particularly pronounced at higher levels. Rivaroxaban concentration in patients from clinical settings was with greater variability compared to the expected ranges. Patients taking underdose of rivaroxaban are more likely to have a trough concentration falling below the targeted therapeutic range.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8733,"journal":{"name":"Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology","volume":"137 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Rivaroxaban Plasma Concentration Using Chromogenic Anti-Xa Assays and UHPLC–MS/MS in Chinese Patients With Atrial Fibrillation\",\"authors\":\"Xiao-qin Liu,&nbsp;Yi Gu,&nbsp;Yu-fei Zhang,&nbsp;Wei Shen,&nbsp;Zhi-chun Gu,&nbsp;Ming-kang Zhong,&nbsp;Hong-yan Ding,&nbsp;Chun-lai Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bcpt.70088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Accurate quantification of rivaroxaban concentration is essential in some specific clinical situations. A prospective study was conducted to compare the rivaroxaban concentration measured by Zhenyuan anti-Xa assay with that by reference methods (ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry [UHPLC–MS/MS] and Biophen DiXal) in 243 plasma samples from 182 patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Zhenyuan anti-Xa assays demonstrated less bias versus reference methods in samples with concentrations exceeding 50 μg/L compared to those in the &lt; 50 μg/L group. Strong correlations were observed between Zhenyuan anti-Xa assays and both reference methods (Pearson's correlation coefficient 0.976 and 0.988, respectively). However, Bland–Altman analysis revealed systematic underestimation by Zhenyuan anti-Xa assays, with mean biases of 41.87 μg/L (vs. UHPLC–MS/MS) and 26.76 μg/L (vs. Biophen DiXal), particularly pronounced at higher levels. Rivaroxaban concentration in patients from clinical settings was with greater variability compared to the expected ranges. Patients taking underdose of rivaroxaban are more likely to have a trough concentration falling below the targeted therapeutic range.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"137 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcpt.70088\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcpt.70088","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

准确定量利伐沙班浓度在一些特殊的临床情况是必不可少的。对182例非瓣膜性心房颤动患者243份血浆样品,采用镇源抗xa法与参比法(超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法[UHPLC-MS /MS]和Biophen DiXal)测定的利伐沙班浓度进行前瞻性比较研究。在浓度超过50 μg/L的样品中,与50 μg/L组相比,镇源抗xa测定法与参考方法的偏差较小。镇源抗xa测定法与两种参考方法均存在较强的相关性(Pearson相关系数分别为0.976和0.988)。然而,Bland-Altman分析显示,镇元抗xa测定法系统性低估,平均偏差为41.87 μg/L(与UHPLC-MS /MS相比),26.76 μg/L(与Biophen DiXal相比),在较高水平时尤为明显。与预期范围相比,临床环境中患者的利伐沙班浓度具有更大的变异性。服用利伐沙班剂量不足的患者更有可能出现谷浓度低于目标治疗范围的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of Rivaroxaban Plasma Concentration Using Chromogenic Anti-Xa Assays and UHPLC–MS/MS in Chinese Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Accurate quantification of rivaroxaban concentration is essential in some specific clinical situations. A prospective study was conducted to compare the rivaroxaban concentration measured by Zhenyuan anti-Xa assay with that by reference methods (ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry [UHPLC–MS/MS] and Biophen DiXal) in 243 plasma samples from 182 patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Zhenyuan anti-Xa assays demonstrated less bias versus reference methods in samples with concentrations exceeding 50 μg/L compared to those in the < 50 μg/L group. Strong correlations were observed between Zhenyuan anti-Xa assays and both reference methods (Pearson's correlation coefficient 0.976 and 0.988, respectively). However, Bland–Altman analysis revealed systematic underestimation by Zhenyuan anti-Xa assays, with mean biases of 41.87 μg/L (vs. UHPLC–MS/MS) and 26.76 μg/L (vs. Biophen DiXal), particularly pronounced at higher levels. Rivaroxaban concentration in patients from clinical settings was with greater variability compared to the expected ranges. Patients taking underdose of rivaroxaban are more likely to have a trough concentration falling below the targeted therapeutic range.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
126
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Basic & Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology is an independent journal, publishing original scientific research in all fields of toxicology, basic and clinical pharmacology. This includes experimental animal pharmacology and toxicology and molecular (-genetic), biochemical and cellular pharmacology and toxicology. It also includes all aspects of clinical pharmacology: pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, therapeutic drug monitoring, drug/drug interactions, pharmacogenetics/-genomics, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacovigilance, pharmacoeconomics, randomized controlled clinical trials and rational pharmacotherapy. For all compounds used in the studies, the chemical constitution and composition should be known, also for natural compounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信