{"title":"中央银行干预和银行流动性:来自薪水保护计划的证据","authors":"Parush Arora , Derek Tran","doi":"10.1016/j.jbankfin.2025.107522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper explores the role of monetary systems when fiscal policy is implemented through the financial sector during a liquidity shock. We use loan-level transactions from the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) to understand how a bank’s decision to borrow funds from the discount window (DW) affected its lending behavior during the COVID-19 crisis. Using an instrumental variable approach, we find a causal relationship between DW access/borrowing and the number of PPP loans extended by large banks, indicating that access to DW increased the effectiveness of the PPP. Although both large and small banks accessed the DW in the absence of a long-term funding source, accessing the DW almost doubled the PPP lending for large banks, but did not have a statistically significant effect for smaller banks. However, during the period without long-term funding, the DW played an important role in relaxing liquidity constraints for large banks and increasing the overall efficiency of the PPP. Beyond PPP loans, we find that DW access led banks to increase their non-PPP lending by 70 % relative to their reserves, suggesting broader benefits to credit provision. The DW effect on PPP lending disappeared after the introduction of PPP Lending Facility as the banks substituted towards the long-term funding, however its impact on non-PPP lending remained significant in both phases.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48460,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Banking & Finance","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 107522"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Central bank intervention and bank liquidity: Evidence from the paycheck protection program\",\"authors\":\"Parush Arora , Derek Tran\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbankfin.2025.107522\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper explores the role of monetary systems when fiscal policy is implemented through the financial sector during a liquidity shock. We use loan-level transactions from the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) to understand how a bank’s decision to borrow funds from the discount window (DW) affected its lending behavior during the COVID-19 crisis. Using an instrumental variable approach, we find a causal relationship between DW access/borrowing and the number of PPP loans extended by large banks, indicating that access to DW increased the effectiveness of the PPP. Although both large and small banks accessed the DW in the absence of a long-term funding source, accessing the DW almost doubled the PPP lending for large banks, but did not have a statistically significant effect for smaller banks. However, during the period without long-term funding, the DW played an important role in relaxing liquidity constraints for large banks and increasing the overall efficiency of the PPP. Beyond PPP loans, we find that DW access led banks to increase their non-PPP lending by 70 % relative to their reserves, suggesting broader benefits to credit provision. The DW effect on PPP lending disappeared after the introduction of PPP Lending Facility as the banks substituted towards the long-term funding, however its impact on non-PPP lending remained significant in both phases.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Banking & Finance\",\"volume\":\"178 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107522\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Banking & Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378426625001426\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Banking & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378426625001426","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Central bank intervention and bank liquidity: Evidence from the paycheck protection program
This paper explores the role of monetary systems when fiscal policy is implemented through the financial sector during a liquidity shock. We use loan-level transactions from the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) to understand how a bank’s decision to borrow funds from the discount window (DW) affected its lending behavior during the COVID-19 crisis. Using an instrumental variable approach, we find a causal relationship between DW access/borrowing and the number of PPP loans extended by large banks, indicating that access to DW increased the effectiveness of the PPP. Although both large and small banks accessed the DW in the absence of a long-term funding source, accessing the DW almost doubled the PPP lending for large banks, but did not have a statistically significant effect for smaller banks. However, during the period without long-term funding, the DW played an important role in relaxing liquidity constraints for large banks and increasing the overall efficiency of the PPP. Beyond PPP loans, we find that DW access led banks to increase their non-PPP lending by 70 % relative to their reserves, suggesting broader benefits to credit provision. The DW effect on PPP lending disappeared after the introduction of PPP Lending Facility as the banks substituted towards the long-term funding, however its impact on non-PPP lending remained significant in both phases.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Banking and Finance (JBF) publishes theoretical and empirical research papers spanning all the major research fields in finance and banking. The aim of the Journal of Banking and Finance is to provide an outlet for the increasing flow of scholarly research concerning financial institutions and the money and capital markets within which they function. The Journal''s emphasis is on theoretical developments and their implementation, empirical, applied, and policy-oriented research in banking and other domestic and international financial institutions and markets. The Journal''s purpose is to improve communications between, and within, the academic and other research communities and policymakers and operational decision makers at financial institutions - private and public, national and international, and their regulators. The Journal is one of the largest Finance journals, with approximately 1500 new submissions per year, mainly in the following areas: Asset Management; Asset Pricing; Banking (Efficiency, Regulation, Risk Management, Solvency); Behavioural Finance; Capital Structure; Corporate Finance; Corporate Governance; Derivative Pricing and Hedging; Distribution Forecasting with Financial Applications; Entrepreneurial Finance; Empirical Finance; Financial Economics; Financial Markets (Alternative, Bonds, Currency, Commodity, Derivatives, Equity, Energy, Real Estate); FinTech; Fund Management; General Equilibrium Models; High-Frequency Trading; Intermediation; International Finance; Hedge Funds; Investments; Liquidity; Market Efficiency; Market Microstructure; Mergers and Acquisitions; Networks; Performance Analysis; Political Risk; Portfolio Optimization; Regulation of Financial Markets and Institutions; Risk Management and Analysis; Systemic Risk; Term Structure Models; Venture Capital.