中央银行干预和银行流动性:来自薪水保护计划的证据

IF 3.8 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Parush Arora , Derek Tran
{"title":"中央银行干预和银行流动性:来自薪水保护计划的证据","authors":"Parush Arora ,&nbsp;Derek Tran","doi":"10.1016/j.jbankfin.2025.107522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper explores the role of monetary systems when fiscal policy is implemented through the financial sector during a liquidity shock. We use loan-level transactions from the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) to understand how a bank’s decision to borrow funds from the discount window (DW) affected its lending behavior during the COVID-19 crisis. Using an instrumental variable approach, we find a causal relationship between DW access/borrowing and the number of PPP loans extended by large banks, indicating that access to DW increased the effectiveness of the PPP. Although both large and small banks accessed the DW in the absence of a long-term funding source, accessing the DW almost doubled the PPP lending for large banks, but did not have a statistically significant effect for smaller banks. However, during the period without long-term funding, the DW played an important role in relaxing liquidity constraints for large banks and increasing the overall efficiency of the PPP. Beyond PPP loans, we find that DW access led banks to increase their non-PPP lending by 70 % relative to their reserves, suggesting broader benefits to credit provision. The DW effect on PPP lending disappeared after the introduction of PPP Lending Facility as the banks substituted towards the long-term funding, however its impact on non-PPP lending remained significant in both phases.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48460,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Banking & Finance","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 107522"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Central bank intervention and bank liquidity: Evidence from the paycheck protection program\",\"authors\":\"Parush Arora ,&nbsp;Derek Tran\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbankfin.2025.107522\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper explores the role of monetary systems when fiscal policy is implemented through the financial sector during a liquidity shock. We use loan-level transactions from the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) to understand how a bank’s decision to borrow funds from the discount window (DW) affected its lending behavior during the COVID-19 crisis. Using an instrumental variable approach, we find a causal relationship between DW access/borrowing and the number of PPP loans extended by large banks, indicating that access to DW increased the effectiveness of the PPP. Although both large and small banks accessed the DW in the absence of a long-term funding source, accessing the DW almost doubled the PPP lending for large banks, but did not have a statistically significant effect for smaller banks. However, during the period without long-term funding, the DW played an important role in relaxing liquidity constraints for large banks and increasing the overall efficiency of the PPP. Beyond PPP loans, we find that DW access led banks to increase their non-PPP lending by 70 % relative to their reserves, suggesting broader benefits to credit provision. The DW effect on PPP lending disappeared after the introduction of PPP Lending Facility as the banks substituted towards the long-term funding, however its impact on non-PPP lending remained significant in both phases.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Banking & Finance\",\"volume\":\"178 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107522\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Banking & Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378426625001426\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Banking & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378426625001426","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了在流动性冲击期间通过金融部门实施财政政策时货币体系的作用。我们利用工资保障计划(PPP)的贷款级交易,了解银行从贴现窗口(DW)借款的决定如何影响其在COVID-19危机期间的贷款行为。使用工具变量方法,我们发现DW获取/借贷与大型银行提供的PPP贷款数量之间存在因果关系,表明获取DW提高了PPP的有效性。尽管在缺乏长期资金来源的情况下,大银行和小银行都使用了DW,但使用DW几乎使大银行的PPP贷款增加了一倍,但对小银行没有统计学上的显著影响。然而,在没有长期融资的时期,DW在放松大型银行的流动性限制和提高PPP的整体效率方面发挥了重要作用。除了PPP贷款外,我们发现DW准入导致银行的非PPP贷款相对于其储备增加了70%,这表明信贷提供的好处更广泛。在引入PPP贷款便利后,随着银行转向长期融资,DW对PPP贷款的影响消失,但其对非PPP贷款的影响在两个阶段都很显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Central bank intervention and bank liquidity: Evidence from the paycheck protection program
This paper explores the role of monetary systems when fiscal policy is implemented through the financial sector during a liquidity shock. We use loan-level transactions from the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) to understand how a bank’s decision to borrow funds from the discount window (DW) affected its lending behavior during the COVID-19 crisis. Using an instrumental variable approach, we find a causal relationship between DW access/borrowing and the number of PPP loans extended by large banks, indicating that access to DW increased the effectiveness of the PPP. Although both large and small banks accessed the DW in the absence of a long-term funding source, accessing the DW almost doubled the PPP lending for large banks, but did not have a statistically significant effect for smaller banks. However, during the period without long-term funding, the DW played an important role in relaxing liquidity constraints for large banks and increasing the overall efficiency of the PPP. Beyond PPP loans, we find that DW access led banks to increase their non-PPP lending by 70 % relative to their reserves, suggesting broader benefits to credit provision. The DW effect on PPP lending disappeared after the introduction of PPP Lending Facility as the banks substituted towards the long-term funding, however its impact on non-PPP lending remained significant in both phases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.40%
发文量
262
期刊介绍: The Journal of Banking and Finance (JBF) publishes theoretical and empirical research papers spanning all the major research fields in finance and banking. The aim of the Journal of Banking and Finance is to provide an outlet for the increasing flow of scholarly research concerning financial institutions and the money and capital markets within which they function. The Journal''s emphasis is on theoretical developments and their implementation, empirical, applied, and policy-oriented research in banking and other domestic and international financial institutions and markets. The Journal''s purpose is to improve communications between, and within, the academic and other research communities and policymakers and operational decision makers at financial institutions - private and public, national and international, and their regulators. The Journal is one of the largest Finance journals, with approximately 1500 new submissions per year, mainly in the following areas: Asset Management; Asset Pricing; Banking (Efficiency, Regulation, Risk Management, Solvency); Behavioural Finance; Capital Structure; Corporate Finance; Corporate Governance; Derivative Pricing and Hedging; Distribution Forecasting with Financial Applications; Entrepreneurial Finance; Empirical Finance; Financial Economics; Financial Markets (Alternative, Bonds, Currency, Commodity, Derivatives, Equity, Energy, Real Estate); FinTech; Fund Management; General Equilibrium Models; High-Frequency Trading; Intermediation; International Finance; Hedge Funds; Investments; Liquidity; Market Efficiency; Market Microstructure; Mergers and Acquisitions; Networks; Performance Analysis; Political Risk; Portfolio Optimization; Regulation of Financial Markets and Institutions; Risk Management and Analysis; Systemic Risk; Term Structure Models; Venture Capital.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信