理性目标追求理论:避免一次性塑料包装领域的经验检验

IF 7 1区 心理学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Bamberg Sebastian , Schmidt Peter , Diehl Yannick , Hamilton Kyra , Ajzen Icek
{"title":"理性目标追求理论:避免一次性塑料包装领域的经验检验","authors":"Bamberg Sebastian ,&nbsp;Schmidt Peter ,&nbsp;Diehl Yannick ,&nbsp;Hamilton Kyra ,&nbsp;Ajzen Icek","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research on the role of goals in shaping pro-environmental behavior remains relatively underdeveloped. By integrating active procurement goals and approval goals into the theory of planned behavior (TPB), the theory of reasoned goal pursuit (TRGP), proposed by Ajzen and Kruglanski (2019), offers a comprehensive framework for conceptualizing the social cognition processes that mediate the effect of goals on behavior. The TRGP highlights the importance of goals by positing not only direct effects of goals on behavioral and normative beliefs, but also their moderating influence on the relationship between these beliefs and the constructs of attitude and subjective norm. Furthermore, the TRGP introduces motivation as a key mediating variable in the relationship between attitude, subjective norm, and behavioral intention, with the effect of attitude and subjective norm on motivation also expected to be moderated by activated goals. This paper presents the methodology and results of a pilot study (N = 49) aimed at identifying active procurement and approval goals, followed by a main study (N = 402) testing key assumptions of the TRGP in the context of avoiding purchasing products packaged in single-use plastic. Structural equation modelling was employed to assess the model, which accounted for 59 % of the variance in attitude, 44 % in subjective norm, 51 % in perceived behavioral control, 69 % in motivation, 83 % in intention, and 14 % in behavior. The results confirm most of the main effects postulated by the TRGP, though no empirical support was found for the proposed moderating effects of activated goals. The article concludes with a discussion of the theoretical and practical implications of the TRGP and offers recommendations for enhancing its empirical implications through improved methodological approaches.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 102698"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The theory of reasoned goal pursuit: An empirical test in the domain of avoiding single-use plastic packaging\",\"authors\":\"Bamberg Sebastian ,&nbsp;Schmidt Peter ,&nbsp;Diehl Yannick ,&nbsp;Hamilton Kyra ,&nbsp;Ajzen Icek\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102698\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Research on the role of goals in shaping pro-environmental behavior remains relatively underdeveloped. By integrating active procurement goals and approval goals into the theory of planned behavior (TPB), the theory of reasoned goal pursuit (TRGP), proposed by Ajzen and Kruglanski (2019), offers a comprehensive framework for conceptualizing the social cognition processes that mediate the effect of goals on behavior. The TRGP highlights the importance of goals by positing not only direct effects of goals on behavioral and normative beliefs, but also their moderating influence on the relationship between these beliefs and the constructs of attitude and subjective norm. Furthermore, the TRGP introduces motivation as a key mediating variable in the relationship between attitude, subjective norm, and behavioral intention, with the effect of attitude and subjective norm on motivation also expected to be moderated by activated goals. This paper presents the methodology and results of a pilot study (N = 49) aimed at identifying active procurement and approval goals, followed by a main study (N = 402) testing key assumptions of the TRGP in the context of avoiding purchasing products packaged in single-use plastic. Structural equation modelling was employed to assess the model, which accounted for 59 % of the variance in attitude, 44 % in subjective norm, 51 % in perceived behavioral control, 69 % in motivation, 83 % in intention, and 14 % in behavior. The results confirm most of the main effects postulated by the TRGP, though no empirical support was found for the proposed moderating effects of activated goals. The article concludes with a discussion of the theoretical and practical implications of the TRGP and offers recommendations for enhancing its empirical implications through improved methodological approaches.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"volume\":\"106 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102698\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425001811\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425001811","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于目标在形成亲环境行为中的作用的研究仍然相对不发达。Ajzen和Kruglanski(2019)提出的理性目标追求理论(TRGP)通过将主动采购目标和批准目标整合到计划行为理论(TPB)中,为概念化目标对行为影响的社会认知过程提供了一个全面的框架。TRGP通过假设目标不仅对行为和规范性信念有直接影响,而且对这些信念与态度和主观规范构建之间的关系有调节作用,强调了目标的重要性。此外,TRGP还将动机作为态度、主观规范和行为意图之间关系的关键中介变量,而态度和主观规范对动机的影响也会被激活的目标所调节。本文介绍了一项旨在确定积极采购和批准目标的试点研究(N = 49)的方法和结果,随后是一项主要研究(N = 402),在避免购买用一次性塑料包装的产品的背景下测试TRGP的关键假设。采用结构方程模型对模型进行评估,其中态度方差占59%,主观规范方差占44%,感知行为控制方差占51%,动机方差占69%,意图方差占83%,行为方差占14%。结果证实了TRGP假设的大部分主要效应,但没有发现激活目标的调节效应的实证支持。文章最后讨论了TRGP的理论和实践意义,并提出了通过改进方法方法来增强其实证意义的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The theory of reasoned goal pursuit: An empirical test in the domain of avoiding single-use plastic packaging
Research on the role of goals in shaping pro-environmental behavior remains relatively underdeveloped. By integrating active procurement goals and approval goals into the theory of planned behavior (TPB), the theory of reasoned goal pursuit (TRGP), proposed by Ajzen and Kruglanski (2019), offers a comprehensive framework for conceptualizing the social cognition processes that mediate the effect of goals on behavior. The TRGP highlights the importance of goals by positing not only direct effects of goals on behavioral and normative beliefs, but also their moderating influence on the relationship between these beliefs and the constructs of attitude and subjective norm. Furthermore, the TRGP introduces motivation as a key mediating variable in the relationship between attitude, subjective norm, and behavioral intention, with the effect of attitude and subjective norm on motivation also expected to be moderated by activated goals. This paper presents the methodology and results of a pilot study (N = 49) aimed at identifying active procurement and approval goals, followed by a main study (N = 402) testing key assumptions of the TRGP in the context of avoiding purchasing products packaged in single-use plastic. Structural equation modelling was employed to assess the model, which accounted for 59 % of the variance in attitude, 44 % in subjective norm, 51 % in perceived behavioral control, 69 % in motivation, 83 % in intention, and 14 % in behavior. The results confirm most of the main effects postulated by the TRGP, though no empirical support was found for the proposed moderating effects of activated goals. The article concludes with a discussion of the theoretical and practical implications of the TRGP and offers recommendations for enhancing its empirical implications through improved methodological approaches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
140
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信