数据迁移,验证和实施一个新的实验室信息系统(LIS)在一个学术病理部门,使用Ellkay数据档案,和Epic Beaker解剖和临床病理模块

Q2 Medicine
Jeffrey Benitez , Adam An , Alec B. Santos , Amelia Flaus , Matt Wawrzyszko , Beverley Young , Eleanor Latta , Catherine J. Streutker , Ju-Yoon Yoon
{"title":"数据迁移,验证和实施一个新的实验室信息系统(LIS)在一个学术病理部门,使用Ellkay数据档案,和Epic Beaker解剖和临床病理模块","authors":"Jeffrey Benitez ,&nbsp;Adam An ,&nbsp;Alec B. Santos ,&nbsp;Amelia Flaus ,&nbsp;Matt Wawrzyszko ,&nbsp;Beverley Young ,&nbsp;Eleanor Latta ,&nbsp;Catherine J. Streutker ,&nbsp;Ju-Yoon Yoon","doi":"10.1016/j.jpi.2025.100459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Implementation of a new laboratory information system (LIS) poses a significant challenge, amplified when synchronous with launch of a new electronic medical record (EMR) system. Our institution made an executive decision to switch to Epic EMR and Epic Beaker LIS from Cerner Soarian/Altera Sunrise EMR and Cemer CoPath Plus LIS in anatomic pathology and molecular genetic pathology, with a simultaneous go-live date. This synchronous migration required a complete overhaul in our department of laboratory medicine, impacting all standard operating procedures (SOPs). In our efforts to minimize potential risks, we pursued a phased approach to comprehensive validation, starting with iterative rounds of optimization, ending with the final round of validation assessing 45 consecutive pathology cases, simulating the entire workflow in a dry-lab setting, from ordering to reporting, including addenda, with additional cases tested for specific workflow steps. In addition, we pursued validation of result component migration, in form of legacy pathology results to the Epic EMR, and the Ellkay archiving system. We found that our SOP adaptations for Epic Beaker reproduced &gt;99% of the workflows previously established using CoPath Plus. The validation performed was limited to Epic Beaker LIS functionality, and, post-go-live, deficiencies were uncovered largely upstream of the LIS. Based on our experience, we formed a framework for systematic validation of LIS workflows, and share our comprehensive handbook, detailing all workflows built before go-live.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37769,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathology Informatics","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100459"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Data migration, validation and implementation of a new laboratory information system (LIS) in an academic pathology department, using Ellkay data archive, and Epic Beaker anatomic and clinical pathology modules\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey Benitez ,&nbsp;Adam An ,&nbsp;Alec B. Santos ,&nbsp;Amelia Flaus ,&nbsp;Matt Wawrzyszko ,&nbsp;Beverley Young ,&nbsp;Eleanor Latta ,&nbsp;Catherine J. Streutker ,&nbsp;Ju-Yoon Yoon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpi.2025.100459\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Implementation of a new laboratory information system (LIS) poses a significant challenge, amplified when synchronous with launch of a new electronic medical record (EMR) system. Our institution made an executive decision to switch to Epic EMR and Epic Beaker LIS from Cerner Soarian/Altera Sunrise EMR and Cemer CoPath Plus LIS in anatomic pathology and molecular genetic pathology, with a simultaneous go-live date. This synchronous migration required a complete overhaul in our department of laboratory medicine, impacting all standard operating procedures (SOPs). In our efforts to minimize potential risks, we pursued a phased approach to comprehensive validation, starting with iterative rounds of optimization, ending with the final round of validation assessing 45 consecutive pathology cases, simulating the entire workflow in a dry-lab setting, from ordering to reporting, including addenda, with additional cases tested for specific workflow steps. In addition, we pursued validation of result component migration, in form of legacy pathology results to the Epic EMR, and the Ellkay archiving system. We found that our SOP adaptations for Epic Beaker reproduced &gt;99% of the workflows previously established using CoPath Plus. The validation performed was limited to Epic Beaker LIS functionality, and, post-go-live, deficiencies were uncovered largely upstream of the LIS. Based on our experience, we formed a framework for systematic validation of LIS workflows, and share our comprehensive handbook, detailing all workflows built before go-live.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pathology Informatics\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100459\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pathology Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2153353925000458\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathology Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2153353925000458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新的实验室信息系统(LIS)的实施带来了重大挑战,当与新的电子病历(EMR)系统同步启动时,这一挑战就会被放大。我们的机构做出了一项行政决定,在解剖病理学和分子遗传病理学方面,从Cerner Soarian/Altera Sunrise EMR和Cemer CoPath Plus LIS切换到Epic EMR和Epic Beaker LIS,并同时投入使用。这种同步迁移需要我们实验室医学部门的全面检查,影响所有标准操作程序(sop)。为了最大限度地降低潜在风险,我们采用了分阶段的方法进行全面验证,从迭代优化开始,以最后一轮验证结束,评估45个连续的病理病例,模拟干实验室环境下的整个工作流程,从订购到报告,包括附录,以及针对特定工作流程步骤测试的其他病例。此外,我们以遗留病理结果的形式对Epic EMR和Ellkay存档系统进行了结果组件迁移的验证。我们发现,Epic Beaker的SOP改编重现了以前使用CoPath Plus建立的99%的工作流程。所执行的验证仅限于Epic Beaker LIS的功能,并且在上线后,发现了大部分LIS上游的缺陷。根据我们的经验,我们形成了一个系统验证LIS工作流的框架,并分享了我们全面的手册,详细说明了在上线之前构建的所有工作流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Data migration, validation and implementation of a new laboratory information system (LIS) in an academic pathology department, using Ellkay data archive, and Epic Beaker anatomic and clinical pathology modules
Implementation of a new laboratory information system (LIS) poses a significant challenge, amplified when synchronous with launch of a new electronic medical record (EMR) system. Our institution made an executive decision to switch to Epic EMR and Epic Beaker LIS from Cerner Soarian/Altera Sunrise EMR and Cemer CoPath Plus LIS in anatomic pathology and molecular genetic pathology, with a simultaneous go-live date. This synchronous migration required a complete overhaul in our department of laboratory medicine, impacting all standard operating procedures (SOPs). In our efforts to minimize potential risks, we pursued a phased approach to comprehensive validation, starting with iterative rounds of optimization, ending with the final round of validation assessing 45 consecutive pathology cases, simulating the entire workflow in a dry-lab setting, from ordering to reporting, including addenda, with additional cases tested for specific workflow steps. In addition, we pursued validation of result component migration, in form of legacy pathology results to the Epic EMR, and the Ellkay archiving system. We found that our SOP adaptations for Epic Beaker reproduced >99% of the workflows previously established using CoPath Plus. The validation performed was limited to Epic Beaker LIS functionality, and, post-go-live, deficiencies were uncovered largely upstream of the LIS. Based on our experience, we formed a framework for systematic validation of LIS workflows, and share our comprehensive handbook, detailing all workflows built before go-live.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pathology Informatics
Journal of Pathology Informatics Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pathology Informatics (JPI) is an open access peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the advancement of pathology informatics. This is the official journal of the Association for Pathology Informatics (API). The journal aims to publish broadly about pathology informatics and freely disseminate all articles worldwide. This journal is of interest to pathologists, informaticians, academics, researchers, health IT specialists, information officers, IT staff, vendors, and anyone with an interest in informatics. We encourage submissions from anyone with an interest in the field of pathology informatics. We publish all types of papers related to pathology informatics including original research articles, technical notes, reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, editorials, symposia, meeting abstracts, book reviews, and correspondence to the editors. All submissions are subject to rigorous peer review by the well-regarded editorial board and by expert referees in appropriate specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信