在为社区卫生工作者开展工作培训项目后,获得了最显著的变化

IF 2 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Sylvia Hoens , Suzannah D’Hooghe , Octavia Kint , Bert Quintiens , Dorien Brosens , Liesbeth De Donder , An-Sofie Smetcoren
{"title":"在为社区卫生工作者开展工作培训项目后,获得了最显著的变化","authors":"Sylvia Hoens ,&nbsp;Suzannah D’Hooghe ,&nbsp;Octavia Kint ,&nbsp;Bert Quintiens ,&nbsp;Dorien Brosens ,&nbsp;Liesbeth De Donder ,&nbsp;An-Sofie Smetcoren","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines the changes community health workers experienced after following a nine-month work-training program and the enabling/disabling factors leading to these changes. Using the Most Significant Change technique, stories from community health workers were collected through individual interviews (N = 9), after which other community health works discussed these stories in a focus group (N = 7). Results showed that Most Significant Changes were: increased knowledge, social skills and attitudes, career discovery and facilitated employability, expanded social networks and support systems, and gained social recognition. Mentoring, peer learning and peer support, and experience-based learning were indispensable in realizing those changes. Participants selected stories as significant when they were recognizable, inspirable, or admirable. Finally, our experience suggests that the Most Significant Change technique mostly identifies positive changes, which has the potential to move programs forward. In future evaluation research using the Most Significant Change, we suggest not only a horizontal (with peers) but also vertical story selection process (with coordinators) to have a deeper understanding of different perspectives and their reasoning behind selecting stories.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48046,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation and Program Planning","volume":"112 ","pages":"Article 102667"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Capturing the most significant change after a work-training program for community health workers\",\"authors\":\"Sylvia Hoens ,&nbsp;Suzannah D’Hooghe ,&nbsp;Octavia Kint ,&nbsp;Bert Quintiens ,&nbsp;Dorien Brosens ,&nbsp;Liesbeth De Donder ,&nbsp;An-Sofie Smetcoren\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102667\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper examines the changes community health workers experienced after following a nine-month work-training program and the enabling/disabling factors leading to these changes. Using the Most Significant Change technique, stories from community health workers were collected through individual interviews (N = 9), after which other community health works discussed these stories in a focus group (N = 7). Results showed that Most Significant Changes were: increased knowledge, social skills and attitudes, career discovery and facilitated employability, expanded social networks and support systems, and gained social recognition. Mentoring, peer learning and peer support, and experience-based learning were indispensable in realizing those changes. Participants selected stories as significant when they were recognizable, inspirable, or admirable. Finally, our experience suggests that the Most Significant Change technique mostly identifies positive changes, which has the potential to move programs forward. In future evaluation research using the Most Significant Change, we suggest not only a horizontal (with peers) but also vertical story selection process (with coordinators) to have a deeper understanding of different perspectives and their reasoning behind selecting stories.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evaluation and Program Planning\",\"volume\":\"112 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102667\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evaluation and Program Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014971892500134X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation and Program Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014971892500134X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了社区卫生工作者在经过9个月的工作培训计划后所经历的变化以及导致这些变化的有利/不利因素。使用最显著变化技术,通过个人访谈收集社区卫生工作者的故事(N = 9),之后其他社区卫生工作人员在焦点小组中讨论这些故事(N = 7)。结果显示,最显著的变化是:知识、社会技能和态度的增加,职业发现和就业能力的促进,社会网络和支持系统的扩大,以及获得社会认可。在实现这些变化的过程中,指导、同伴学习和同伴支持以及基于经验的学习是不可或缺的。参与者选择的故事是可识别的、鼓舞人心的或令人钦佩的。最后,我们的经验表明,Most Significant Change技术主要识别积极的变化,这些变化具有推动项目向前发展的潜力。在未来使用“最显著变化”的评估研究中,我们建议不仅要进行横向(与同伴),还要进行纵向(与协调员)的故事选择过程,以更深入地了解不同的视角及其选择故事背后的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Capturing the most significant change after a work-training program for community health workers
This paper examines the changes community health workers experienced after following a nine-month work-training program and the enabling/disabling factors leading to these changes. Using the Most Significant Change technique, stories from community health workers were collected through individual interviews (N = 9), after which other community health works discussed these stories in a focus group (N = 7). Results showed that Most Significant Changes were: increased knowledge, social skills and attitudes, career discovery and facilitated employability, expanded social networks and support systems, and gained social recognition. Mentoring, peer learning and peer support, and experience-based learning were indispensable in realizing those changes. Participants selected stories as significant when they were recognizable, inspirable, or admirable. Finally, our experience suggests that the Most Significant Change technique mostly identifies positive changes, which has the potential to move programs forward. In future evaluation research using the Most Significant Change, we suggest not only a horizontal (with peers) but also vertical story selection process (with coordinators) to have a deeper understanding of different perspectives and their reasoning behind selecting stories.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evaluation and Program Planning
Evaluation and Program Planning SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Evaluation and Program Planning is based on the principle that the techniques and methods of evaluation and planning transcend the boundaries of specific fields and that relevant contributions to these areas come from people representing many different positions, intellectual traditions, and interests. In order to further the development of evaluation and planning, we publish articles from the private and public sectors in a wide range of areas: organizational development and behavior, training, planning, human resource development, health and mental, social services, mental retardation, corrections, substance abuse, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信