漂流鱼类聚集装置作为研究海洋海洋保护区的工具

IF 2.3 2区 农林科学 Q2 FISHERIES
Arthur Blanluet , Edward T. Game , Kydd Pollock , Nicholas H. Wolff , Jason D. Everett , Sandra Neubert , Daniel C. Dunn , Anthony J. Richardson
{"title":"漂流鱼类聚集装置作为研究海洋海洋保护区的工具","authors":"Arthur Blanluet ,&nbsp;Edward T. Game ,&nbsp;Kydd Pollock ,&nbsp;Nicholas H. Wolff ,&nbsp;Jason D. Everett ,&nbsp;Sandra Neubert ,&nbsp;Daniel C. Dunn ,&nbsp;Anthony J. Richardson","doi":"10.1016/j.fishres.2025.107474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To meet global conservation targets, there is a growing effort to establish oceanic (waters &gt;200 m depth) marine protected areas (oMPAs). However, despite substantial evidence for benefits of coastal MPAs to fish and fisheries, the effectiveness of oMPAs has been challenging to assess robustly. This is mainly because targeted data collection is expensive, so research often relies on catch data restricted to areas outside oMPA boundaries. Here we explore the use of drifting fish aggregating devices (dFADs) as a novel method to assess the effectiveness of oMPAs. We used acoustic data from 902 dFADs deployed by the fishing industry that drifted across the US Pacific Islands Heritage Marine National Monument around Palmyra Atoll – providing data both inside and outside the oMPA – to study spatial variation in tuna biomass density. Using a generalised additive mixed model with a suite of environmental covariates, we found the relationship between tuna biomass density and many environmental covariates made intuitive ecological sense with respect to known tuna behaviour, providing confidence in the model. We found no measurable increase in tuna biomass density inside the oMPA. This finding could have been influenced by the low fishing pressure around this particular oMPA, and regions with greater contrast in fishing pressure might show different results. This research highlights the utility of dFADs as a cost-effective tool for future studies to assess tuna biomass, especially in regions difficult or costly to sample as oMPAs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50443,"journal":{"name":"Fisheries Research","volume":"289 ","pages":"Article 107474"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drifting fish aggregation devices as a tool to study oceanic marine protected areas\",\"authors\":\"Arthur Blanluet ,&nbsp;Edward T. Game ,&nbsp;Kydd Pollock ,&nbsp;Nicholas H. Wolff ,&nbsp;Jason D. Everett ,&nbsp;Sandra Neubert ,&nbsp;Daniel C. Dunn ,&nbsp;Anthony J. Richardson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fishres.2025.107474\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>To meet global conservation targets, there is a growing effort to establish oceanic (waters &gt;200 m depth) marine protected areas (oMPAs). However, despite substantial evidence for benefits of coastal MPAs to fish and fisheries, the effectiveness of oMPAs has been challenging to assess robustly. This is mainly because targeted data collection is expensive, so research often relies on catch data restricted to areas outside oMPA boundaries. Here we explore the use of drifting fish aggregating devices (dFADs) as a novel method to assess the effectiveness of oMPAs. We used acoustic data from 902 dFADs deployed by the fishing industry that drifted across the US Pacific Islands Heritage Marine National Monument around Palmyra Atoll – providing data both inside and outside the oMPA – to study spatial variation in tuna biomass density. Using a generalised additive mixed model with a suite of environmental covariates, we found the relationship between tuna biomass density and many environmental covariates made intuitive ecological sense with respect to known tuna behaviour, providing confidence in the model. We found no measurable increase in tuna biomass density inside the oMPA. This finding could have been influenced by the low fishing pressure around this particular oMPA, and regions with greater contrast in fishing pressure might show different results. This research highlights the utility of dFADs as a cost-effective tool for future studies to assess tuna biomass, especially in regions difficult or costly to sample as oMPAs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fisheries Research\",\"volume\":\"289 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107474\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fisheries Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165783625002115\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fisheries Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165783625002115","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了实现全球保护目标,建立海洋(水深200 米)海洋保护区(ompa)的努力越来越大。然而,尽管有大量证据表明沿海海洋保护区对渔业和渔业有好处,但对海洋保护区的有效性进行有力评估一直具有挑战性。这主要是因为有针对性的数据收集是昂贵的,因此研究往往依赖于局限于oMPA边界以外区域的捕获数据。在这里,我们探讨了使用漂流鱼聚集装置(dFADs)作为评估ompa有效性的新方法。我们使用了渔业部署的902个dfad的声学数据,这些dfad漂浮在帕尔米拉环礁周围的美国太平洋岛屿遗产海洋国家纪念碑上,提供了oMPA内外的数据,研究了金枪鱼生物量密度的空间变化。使用一组环境协变量的广义加性混合模型,我们发现金枪鱼生物量密度与许多环境协变量之间的关系对于已知的金枪鱼行为具有直观的生态意义,为模型提供了信心。我们发现在oMPA内金枪鱼生物量密度没有可测量的增加。这一发现可能受到这个特殊的oMPA周围低捕捞压力的影响,而捕捞压力对比较大的地区可能会显示出不同的结果。这项研究突出了dFADs作为未来研究评估金枪鱼生物量的成本效益工具的效用,特别是在难以或昂贵的区域取样作为ompa。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Drifting fish aggregation devices as a tool to study oceanic marine protected areas
To meet global conservation targets, there is a growing effort to establish oceanic (waters >200 m depth) marine protected areas (oMPAs). However, despite substantial evidence for benefits of coastal MPAs to fish and fisheries, the effectiveness of oMPAs has been challenging to assess robustly. This is mainly because targeted data collection is expensive, so research often relies on catch data restricted to areas outside oMPA boundaries. Here we explore the use of drifting fish aggregating devices (dFADs) as a novel method to assess the effectiveness of oMPAs. We used acoustic data from 902 dFADs deployed by the fishing industry that drifted across the US Pacific Islands Heritage Marine National Monument around Palmyra Atoll – providing data both inside and outside the oMPA – to study spatial variation in tuna biomass density. Using a generalised additive mixed model with a suite of environmental covariates, we found the relationship between tuna biomass density and many environmental covariates made intuitive ecological sense with respect to known tuna behaviour, providing confidence in the model. We found no measurable increase in tuna biomass density inside the oMPA. This finding could have been influenced by the low fishing pressure around this particular oMPA, and regions with greater contrast in fishing pressure might show different results. This research highlights the utility of dFADs as a cost-effective tool for future studies to assess tuna biomass, especially in regions difficult or costly to sample as oMPAs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fisheries Research
Fisheries Research 农林科学-渔业
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
294
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal provides an international forum for the publication of papers in the areas of fisheries science, fishing technology, fisheries management and relevant socio-economics. The scope covers fisheries in salt, brackish and freshwater systems, and all aspects of associated ecology, environmental aspects of fisheries, and economics. Both theoretical and practical papers are acceptable, including laboratory and field experimental studies relevant to fisheries. Papers on the conservation of exploitable living resources are welcome. Review and Viewpoint articles are also published. As the specified areas inevitably impinge on and interrelate with each other, the approach of the journal is multidisciplinary, and authors are encouraged to emphasise the relevance of their own work to that of other disciplines. The journal is intended for fisheries scientists, biological oceanographers, gear technologists, economists, managers, administrators, policy makers and legislators.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信