Qingming Wang , Chao Xu , Geye Li , Panpan Shen , Chongxi Zhao
{"title":"土工合成加筋土(GRS)桥台不同配筋间距和抗拉刚度组合的离心模拟","authors":"Qingming Wang , Chao Xu , Geye Li , Panpan Shen , Chongxi Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.geotexmem.2025.07.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Three centrifuge model tests were conducted to investigate the performance of geosynthetic reinforced soil (GRS) abutments with modular block facing under localized vertical loads. This study examined the effects of different combinations of reinforcement spacing <em>S</em><sub><em>v</em></sub> and tensile stiffness <em>J</em> on the behavior of GRS abutments. In this study, river sand and woven geotextiles were used as the backfill soil and reinforcement material, respectively. Test results show that under the same ratio of <em>J</em>/<em>S</em><sub><em>v</em></sub> = 3.7, using the combination of smaller <em>S</em><sub><em>v</em></sub> and lower <em>J</em> was more effective in minimizing the beam seat settlements and the lateral facing displacements induced by localized vertical loads than the combination of larger <em>S</em><sub><em>v</em></sub> and higher <em>J</em>. Meanwhile, smaller additional vertical stresses transferred from the applied loads within the GRS abutment and smaller reinforcement tensile forces were also observed for the combination of smaller <em>S</em><sub><em>v</em></sub> and lower <em>J</em>. Furthermore, the maximum tensile forces in each layer occurred under the beam seat for the upper reinforcement layers and near the facing for the lower layers for all three tests. A more uniform distribution of the reinforcement tensile force was found for the combination of smaller <em>S</em><sub><em>v</em></sub> and lower <em>J</em>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55096,"journal":{"name":"Geotextiles and Geomembranes","volume":"53 6","pages":"Pages 1473-1482"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Centrifuge modeling on the geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) abutments with different combinations of reinforcement spacing and tensile stiffness\",\"authors\":\"Qingming Wang , Chao Xu , Geye Li , Panpan Shen , Chongxi Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geotexmem.2025.07.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Three centrifuge model tests were conducted to investigate the performance of geosynthetic reinforced soil (GRS) abutments with modular block facing under localized vertical loads. This study examined the effects of different combinations of reinforcement spacing <em>S</em><sub><em>v</em></sub> and tensile stiffness <em>J</em> on the behavior of GRS abutments. In this study, river sand and woven geotextiles were used as the backfill soil and reinforcement material, respectively. Test results show that under the same ratio of <em>J</em>/<em>S</em><sub><em>v</em></sub> = 3.7, using the combination of smaller <em>S</em><sub><em>v</em></sub> and lower <em>J</em> was more effective in minimizing the beam seat settlements and the lateral facing displacements induced by localized vertical loads than the combination of larger <em>S</em><sub><em>v</em></sub> and higher <em>J</em>. Meanwhile, smaller additional vertical stresses transferred from the applied loads within the GRS abutment and smaller reinforcement tensile forces were also observed for the combination of smaller <em>S</em><sub><em>v</em></sub> and lower <em>J</em>. Furthermore, the maximum tensile forces in each layer occurred under the beam seat for the upper reinforcement layers and near the facing for the lower layers for all three tests. A more uniform distribution of the reinforcement tensile force was found for the combination of smaller <em>S</em><sub><em>v</em></sub> and lower <em>J</em>.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geotextiles and Geomembranes\",\"volume\":\"53 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1473-1482\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geotextiles and Geomembranes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266114425000925\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geotextiles and Geomembranes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266114425000925","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Centrifuge modeling on the geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) abutments with different combinations of reinforcement spacing and tensile stiffness
Three centrifuge model tests were conducted to investigate the performance of geosynthetic reinforced soil (GRS) abutments with modular block facing under localized vertical loads. This study examined the effects of different combinations of reinforcement spacing Sv and tensile stiffness J on the behavior of GRS abutments. In this study, river sand and woven geotextiles were used as the backfill soil and reinforcement material, respectively. Test results show that under the same ratio of J/Sv = 3.7, using the combination of smaller Sv and lower J was more effective in minimizing the beam seat settlements and the lateral facing displacements induced by localized vertical loads than the combination of larger Sv and higher J. Meanwhile, smaller additional vertical stresses transferred from the applied loads within the GRS abutment and smaller reinforcement tensile forces were also observed for the combination of smaller Sv and lower J. Furthermore, the maximum tensile forces in each layer occurred under the beam seat for the upper reinforcement layers and near the facing for the lower layers for all three tests. A more uniform distribution of the reinforcement tensile force was found for the combination of smaller Sv and lower J.
期刊介绍:
The range of products and their applications has expanded rapidly over the last decade with geotextiles and geomembranes being specified world wide. This rapid growth is paralleled by a virtual explosion of technology. Current reference books and even manufacturers' sponsored publications tend to date very quickly and the need for a vehicle to bring together and discuss the growing body of technology now available has become evident.
Geotextiles and Geomembranes fills this need and provides a forum for the dissemination of information amongst research workers, designers, users and manufacturers. By providing a growing fund of information the journal increases general awareness, prompts further research and assists in the establishment of international codes and regulations.