过度依赖人工智能代码助手对科学软件的威胁。

IF 18.3 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Gabrielle O’Brien
{"title":"过度依赖人工智能代码助手对科学软件的威胁。","authors":"Gabrielle O’Brien","doi":"10.1038/s43588-025-00845-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The adoption of generative artificial intelligence (AI) code assistants in scientific software development is promising, but user studies across an array of programming contexts suggest that programmers are at risk of over-reliance on these tools, leading them to accept undetected errors in generated code. Scientific software may be particularly vulnerable to such errors because most research code is untested and scientists are undertrained in software development skills. This Comment outlines the factors that place scientific code at risk and suggests directions for research groups, educators, publishers and funders to counter these liabilities.","PeriodicalId":74246,"journal":{"name":"Nature computational science","volume":"5 9","pages":"701-703"},"PeriodicalIF":18.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Threats to scientific software from over-reliance on AI code assistants\",\"authors\":\"Gabrielle O’Brien\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s43588-025-00845-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The adoption of generative artificial intelligence (AI) code assistants in scientific software development is promising, but user studies across an array of programming contexts suggest that programmers are at risk of over-reliance on these tools, leading them to accept undetected errors in generated code. Scientific software may be particularly vulnerable to such errors because most research code is untested and scientists are undertrained in software development skills. This Comment outlines the factors that place scientific code at risk and suggests directions for research groups, educators, publishers and funders to counter these liabilities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature computational science\",\"volume\":\"5 9\",\"pages\":\"701-703\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":18.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature computational science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43588-025-00845-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature computational science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43588-025-00845-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在科学软件开发中采用生成式人工智能(AI)代码助手是有前途的,但对一系列编程环境的用户研究表明,程序员有过度依赖这些工具的风险,导致他们接受生成代码中未被发现的错误。科学软件可能特别容易受到这类错误的影响,因为大多数研究代码未经测试,科学家在软件开发技能方面训练不足。本评论概述了使科学代码面临风险的因素,并为研究团体、教育工作者、出版商和资助者提出了应对这些责任的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Threats to scientific software from over-reliance on AI code assistants
The adoption of generative artificial intelligence (AI) code assistants in scientific software development is promising, but user studies across an array of programming contexts suggest that programmers are at risk of over-reliance on these tools, leading them to accept undetected errors in generated code. Scientific software may be particularly vulnerable to such errors because most research code is untested and scientists are undertrained in software development skills. This Comment outlines the factors that place scientific code at risk and suggests directions for research groups, educators, publishers and funders to counter these liabilities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信