呼吸治疗师在美国的贡献:范围审查。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Marco Zaccagnini, Fred Liang, Clement Tse, Ashley Bucknall, Mika L Nonoyama, Lee Wisdom, Natalie Napolitano, Brian K Walsh, Shirley Quach
{"title":"呼吸治疗师在美国的贡献:范围审查。","authors":"Marco Zaccagnini, Fred Liang, Clement Tse, Ashley Bucknall, Mika L Nonoyama, Lee Wisdom, Natalie Napolitano, Brian K Walsh, Shirley Quach","doi":"10.1089/respcare.13044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Respiratory therapists (RTs) provide essential care across the United States of America (USA) in various health care settings, with a prominent role in critical care. RTs specialize in managing mechanical ventilation, maintaining patent airways, and assisting with specialized procedures. While RTs in the USA have a broad scope of practice, it varies based on multiple factors; as a result, limited evidence exists detailing their specific roles and responsibilities. This review aims to map the breadth and depth of the available literature on RT practice in critical care within the USA. This review included three aims: (1) describe the practices and roles of RTs in adult critical care settings (including value-efficiency scores), (2) summarize the different RT models of care in critical care teams in the USA, and (3) investigate regional variations in RT practices in critical care across the USA. This scoping review was guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. Studies that described the RT role in adult critical care within the USA were included. Data extraction was informed by the Respiratory Therapy Practice-Based Outcome Initiative (RT-PBOI) model and value-efficiency metrics. Eighty peer-reviewed articles and 45 pieces of grey literature met the inclusion criteria (total 125). RTs' roles and responsibilities were categorized per the RT-PBOI model as follows: Technical Skills (131), Approach to Practice (90), Leveraging Capacity (45), Strategic Expertise (73), and Growing Value for the Future (16). The grey literature (45) provided brief descriptions of the RT scope from various state regulatory/licensing bodies or state respiratory societies, guidelines, reports, and/or position statements. While RTs are crucial to critical care, gaps remain in quantifying their impact and clearly defining their evolving scope of practice. Further research is essential to optimize their integration into care teams, quantify impact, and improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Contributions of Respiratory Therapists in the United States of America: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Marco Zaccagnini, Fred Liang, Clement Tse, Ashley Bucknall, Mika L Nonoyama, Lee Wisdom, Natalie Napolitano, Brian K Walsh, Shirley Quach\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/respcare.13044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Respiratory therapists (RTs) provide essential care across the United States of America (USA) in various health care settings, with a prominent role in critical care. RTs specialize in managing mechanical ventilation, maintaining patent airways, and assisting with specialized procedures. While RTs in the USA have a broad scope of practice, it varies based on multiple factors; as a result, limited evidence exists detailing their specific roles and responsibilities. This review aims to map the breadth and depth of the available literature on RT practice in critical care within the USA. This review included three aims: (1) describe the practices and roles of RTs in adult critical care settings (including value-efficiency scores), (2) summarize the different RT models of care in critical care teams in the USA, and (3) investigate regional variations in RT practices in critical care across the USA. This scoping review was guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. Studies that described the RT role in adult critical care within the USA were included. Data extraction was informed by the Respiratory Therapy Practice-Based Outcome Initiative (RT-PBOI) model and value-efficiency metrics. Eighty peer-reviewed articles and 45 pieces of grey literature met the inclusion criteria (total 125). RTs' roles and responsibilities were categorized per the RT-PBOI model as follows: Technical Skills (131), Approach to Practice (90), Leveraging Capacity (45), Strategic Expertise (73), and Growing Value for the Future (16). The grey literature (45) provided brief descriptions of the RT scope from various state regulatory/licensing bodies or state respiratory societies, guidelines, reports, and/or position statements. While RTs are crucial to critical care, gaps remain in quantifying their impact and clearly defining their evolving scope of practice. Further research is essential to optimize their integration into care teams, quantify impact, and improve patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/respcare.13044\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/respcare.13044","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

呼吸治疗师(RTs)在美国各地的各种卫生保健机构提供基本护理,在重症监护中发挥着突出作用。rt专门管理机械通气,维持气道通畅,并协助专门的程序。虽然美国的RTs具有广泛的实践范围,但它基于多种因素而有所不同;因此,详细说明其具体作用和责任的证据有限。本综述的目的是绘制的广度和深度的现有文献RT实践在美国的重症监护。本综述包括三个目的:(1)描述急诊治疗在成人重症监护环境中的实践和作用(包括价值效率评分);(2)总结美国重症监护团队中不同的急诊治疗模式;(3)调查美国重症监护中急诊治疗实践的地区差异。这个范围审查是由乔安娜布里格斯研究所的范围审查方法指导的。包括了描述RT在美国成人重症监护中的作用的研究。数据提取由呼吸治疗基于实践的结果倡议(RT-PBOI)模型和价值-效率指标提供信息。80篇同行评议文章和45篇灰色文献符合纳入标准(共125篇)。根据RT-PBOI模型,RTs的角色和职责被分类如下:技术技能(131),实践方法(90),利用能力(45),战略专业知识(73)和未来增长价值(16)。灰色文献(45)提供了来自各个州监管/许可机构或州呼吸学会、指南、报告和/或立场声明的RT范围的简要描述。虽然RTs对重症监护至关重要,但在量化其影响和明确定义其不断发展的实践范围方面仍然存在差距。进一步的研究对于优化其与护理团队的整合、量化影响和改善患者预后至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Contributions of Respiratory Therapists in the United States of America: A Scoping Review.

Respiratory therapists (RTs) provide essential care across the United States of America (USA) in various health care settings, with a prominent role in critical care. RTs specialize in managing mechanical ventilation, maintaining patent airways, and assisting with specialized procedures. While RTs in the USA have a broad scope of practice, it varies based on multiple factors; as a result, limited evidence exists detailing their specific roles and responsibilities. This review aims to map the breadth and depth of the available literature on RT practice in critical care within the USA. This review included three aims: (1) describe the practices and roles of RTs in adult critical care settings (including value-efficiency scores), (2) summarize the different RT models of care in critical care teams in the USA, and (3) investigate regional variations in RT practices in critical care across the USA. This scoping review was guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. Studies that described the RT role in adult critical care within the USA were included. Data extraction was informed by the Respiratory Therapy Practice-Based Outcome Initiative (RT-PBOI) model and value-efficiency metrics. Eighty peer-reviewed articles and 45 pieces of grey literature met the inclusion criteria (total 125). RTs' roles and responsibilities were categorized per the RT-PBOI model as follows: Technical Skills (131), Approach to Practice (90), Leveraging Capacity (45), Strategic Expertise (73), and Growing Value for the Future (16). The grey literature (45) provided brief descriptions of the RT scope from various state regulatory/licensing bodies or state respiratory societies, guidelines, reports, and/or position statements. While RTs are crucial to critical care, gaps remain in quantifying their impact and clearly defining their evolving scope of practice. Further research is essential to optimize their integration into care teams, quantify impact, and improve patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory care
Respiratory care 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
16.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信