儿童癌症研究中LexisNexis居住史可用性和登记数据一致性的预测因素。

IF 4.1 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Natalie R Binczewski, Libby M Morimoto, Joseph L Wiemels, Xiaomei Ma, Catherine Metayer, Verónica M Vieira
{"title":"儿童癌症研究中LexisNexis居住史可用性和登记数据一致性的预测因素。","authors":"Natalie R Binczewski, Libby M Morimoto, Joseph L Wiemels, Xiaomei Ma, Catherine Metayer, Verónica M Vieira","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkaf075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Use of a commercial database to obtain residential history information in environmental epidemiologic studies of cancer can lead to information bias if data availability varies by individual sociodemographic factors or case status. Residential data that are not missing at random and data that are discordant with cancer registry or birth record address data can impact subsequent exposure assessments. In our study of childhood cancers, we aimed to determine if the availability of residential history information differs by case status or other potential confounders and if there was agreement with cancer registry and birth records address data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We worked with LexisNexis to retrieve residential histories for mothers of 3573 childhood cancer cases and 7160 controls born 2000-2015 in Los Angeles and Orange Counties in Southern California. We used linear regression to determine independent predictors of having residential history returned by LexisNexis. We assessed concordance between maternal address at birth and child's address at diagnosis available from registry data and the LexisNexis residential history by comparing street addresses and geocoded coordinates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Maternal characteristics (birthplace, race and ethnicity, education, insurance provider) and child's case status were associated with the mother having any address returned by LexisNexis. When comparing geocoded coordinates of cases, less than 10% of LexisNexis addresses during the diagnosis year matched cancer registry addresses. Birth record addresses matched LexisNexis-provided addresses for 47% of mothers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion(s): </strong>This study elucidates potential implications of using commercial databases such as LexisNexis to reconstruct residential histories and derive exposure measures in cancer case-control studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12448388/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of LexisNexis residential history availability and registry data concordance for childhood cancer research.\",\"authors\":\"Natalie R Binczewski, Libby M Morimoto, Joseph L Wiemels, Xiaomei Ma, Catherine Metayer, Verónica M Vieira\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jncics/pkaf075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Use of a commercial database to obtain residential history information in environmental epidemiologic studies of cancer can lead to information bias if data availability varies by individual sociodemographic factors or case status. Residential data that are not missing at random and data that are discordant with cancer registry or birth record address data can impact subsequent exposure assessments. In our study of childhood cancers, we aimed to determine if the availability of residential history information differs by case status or other potential confounders and if there was agreement with cancer registry and birth records address data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We worked with LexisNexis to retrieve residential histories for mothers of 3573 childhood cancer cases and 7160 controls born 2000-2015 in Los Angeles and Orange Counties in Southern California. We used linear regression to determine independent predictors of having residential history returned by LexisNexis. We assessed concordance between maternal address at birth and child's address at diagnosis available from registry data and the LexisNexis residential history by comparing street addresses and geocoded coordinates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Maternal characteristics (birthplace, race and ethnicity, education, insurance provider) and child's case status were associated with the mother having any address returned by LexisNexis. When comparing geocoded coordinates of cases, less than 10% of LexisNexis addresses during the diagnosis year matched cancer registry addresses. Birth record addresses matched LexisNexis-provided addresses for 47% of mothers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion(s): </strong>This study elucidates potential implications of using commercial databases such as LexisNexis to reconstruct residential histories and derive exposure measures in cancer case-control studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JNCI Cancer Spectrum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12448388/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JNCI Cancer Spectrum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaf075\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaf075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在癌症环境流行病学研究中,如果数据可得性因个体社会人口因素或病例状况而异,使用商业数据库获取居住史信息可能导致信息偏差。非随机缺失的居住数据以及与癌症登记或出生记录地址数据不一致的数据可能会影响随后的暴露评估。在我们的儿童癌症研究中,我们旨在确定居住史信息的可用性是否因病例状态或其他潜在混杂因素而不同,以及是否与癌症登记和出生记录地址数据一致。方法:我们与LexisNexis合作,检索了南加州洛杉矶和奥兰治县2000-2015年出生的3,573例儿童癌症病例和7,160例对照的母亲的居住历史。我们使用线性回归来确定LexisNexis返回的居住历史的独立预测因子。通过比较街道地址和地理编码坐标,我们评估了从登记数据和LexisNexis居住历史中获得的母亲出生地址和儿童诊断地址之间的一致性。结果:母亲的特征(出生地、种族和民族、教育程度、保险提供者)和儿童的病例状况与母亲有LexisNexis返回的地址有关。当比较病例的地理编码坐标时,诊断年份的LexisNexis地址中小于10%与癌症登记地址匹配。47%的母亲的出生记录地址与lexisnexis提供的地址相匹配。结论:本研究阐明了使用LexisNexis等商业数据库重建居住历史并在癌症病例对照研究中得出暴露措施的潜在意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictors of LexisNexis residential history availability and registry data concordance for childhood cancer research.

Background: Use of a commercial database to obtain residential history information in environmental epidemiologic studies of cancer can lead to information bias if data availability varies by individual sociodemographic factors or case status. Residential data that are not missing at random and data that are discordant with cancer registry or birth record address data can impact subsequent exposure assessments. In our study of childhood cancers, we aimed to determine if the availability of residential history information differs by case status or other potential confounders and if there was agreement with cancer registry and birth records address data.

Methods: We worked with LexisNexis to retrieve residential histories for mothers of 3573 childhood cancer cases and 7160 controls born 2000-2015 in Los Angeles and Orange Counties in Southern California. We used linear regression to determine independent predictors of having residential history returned by LexisNexis. We assessed concordance between maternal address at birth and child's address at diagnosis available from registry data and the LexisNexis residential history by comparing street addresses and geocoded coordinates.

Results: Maternal characteristics (birthplace, race and ethnicity, education, insurance provider) and child's case status were associated with the mother having any address returned by LexisNexis. When comparing geocoded coordinates of cases, less than 10% of LexisNexis addresses during the diagnosis year matched cancer registry addresses. Birth record addresses matched LexisNexis-provided addresses for 47% of mothers.

Conclusion(s): This study elucidates potential implications of using commercial databases such as LexisNexis to reconstruct residential histories and derive exposure measures in cancer case-control studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
JNCI Cancer Spectrum Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信