针对目标教育、过程改进和系统集成(STEPS)的模拟:一种使用原位模拟来改善医疗保健质量的新方法。

IF 2.4 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jessica C Schoen, Janee M Klipfel, Shelley M Wolfe, Valerie D Willis, Vanessa E Torbenson, Jason J DeWitt, Jennifer L Fang, Regan N Theiler
{"title":"针对目标教育、过程改进和系统集成(STEPS)的模拟:一种使用原位模拟来改善医疗保健质量的新方法。","authors":"Jessica C Schoen, Janee M Klipfel, Shelley M Wolfe, Valerie D Willis, Vanessa E Torbenson, Jason J DeWitt, Jennifer L Fang, Regan N Theiler","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2025.06.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To meet Joint Commission maternal safety standards and facilitate the implementation of acute care obstetrics telemedicine (TeleOB) consultation services throughout one health system, the authors developed a novel in situ simulation framework called STEPS: Simulation for Targeted Education, Process improvement, and Systems integration. STEPS addresses education, process improvement, and systems integration objectives within each simulation scenario, a three-in-one approach to in situ simulation that has not been previously described.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The STEPS framework was used to design and implement multidisciplinary in situ simulations in six emergency departments and four labor and delivery units in two states. Simulations and debriefs were facilitated by simulation education-trained faculty. Opportunities for improvement (OFIs) were addressed by appropriate leadership teams. Participants provided feedback via a voluntary survey after each simulation session.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 136 OFIs were identified. Many OFIs were observed in more than one simulation session or across multiple sites, but 33 were distinct (9 distinct educational OFIs, 16 distinct process improvement OFIs, and 8 distinct systems integration OFIs). OFIs were assigned to appropriate personnel to design and implement mitigation strategies. Simulation faculty followed up with site leadership about two weeks after each simulation session to provide feedback and review the status of mitigation efforts. Of 162 participants, 91 (56.2%) completed the post-session survey. Of those who responded, 96.7% reported increased confidence in managing similar cases in their own practice. Many also noted improved familiarity with telemedicine resources and workflows.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The STEPS approach is a novel and effective way to simultaneously meet education, process improvement, and systems integration objectives in each simulation scenario and across a large health system.</p>","PeriodicalId":14835,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simulation for Targeted Education, Process Improvement, and Systems Integration (STEPS): A Novel Approach to Health Care Quality Improvement Using In Situ Simulation.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica C Schoen, Janee M Klipfel, Shelley M Wolfe, Valerie D Willis, Vanessa E Torbenson, Jason J DeWitt, Jennifer L Fang, Regan N Theiler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcjq.2025.06.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To meet Joint Commission maternal safety standards and facilitate the implementation of acute care obstetrics telemedicine (TeleOB) consultation services throughout one health system, the authors developed a novel in situ simulation framework called STEPS: Simulation for Targeted Education, Process improvement, and Systems integration. STEPS addresses education, process improvement, and systems integration objectives within each simulation scenario, a three-in-one approach to in situ simulation that has not been previously described.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The STEPS framework was used to design and implement multidisciplinary in situ simulations in six emergency departments and four labor and delivery units in two states. Simulations and debriefs were facilitated by simulation education-trained faculty. Opportunities for improvement (OFIs) were addressed by appropriate leadership teams. Participants provided feedback via a voluntary survey after each simulation session.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 136 OFIs were identified. Many OFIs were observed in more than one simulation session or across multiple sites, but 33 were distinct (9 distinct educational OFIs, 16 distinct process improvement OFIs, and 8 distinct systems integration OFIs). OFIs were assigned to appropriate personnel to design and implement mitigation strategies. Simulation faculty followed up with site leadership about two weeks after each simulation session to provide feedback and review the status of mitigation efforts. Of 162 participants, 91 (56.2%) completed the post-session survey. Of those who responded, 96.7% reported increased confidence in managing similar cases in their own practice. Many also noted improved familiarity with telemedicine resources and workflows.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The STEPS approach is a novel and effective way to simultaneously meet education, process improvement, and systems integration objectives in each simulation scenario and across a large health system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2025.06.005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2025.06.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:为了满足联合委员会产妇安全标准,促进急性护理产科远程医疗(TeleOB)咨询服务在一个卫生系统中的实施,作者开发了一种新的原位模拟框架,称为STEPS:目标教育、过程改进和系统集成的模拟。STEPS解决了每个模拟场景中的教育、过程改进和系统集成目标,这是一种三合一的原位模拟方法,以前没有描述过。方法:采用STEPS框架在两个州的6个急诊科和4个产房设计并实施多学科现场模拟。模拟和汇报由受过模拟教育训练的教员进行。由适当的领导团队处理改进机会(ofi)。参与者在每次模拟会议后通过自愿调查提供反馈。结果:共鉴定出136例ofi。许多ofi在多个模拟会议或多个地点被观察到,但33个是不同的(9个不同的教育ofi, 16个不同的过程改进ofi, 8个不同的系统集成ofi)。办事处被指派适当人员设计和执行缓解战略。模拟学院在每次模拟会议后约两周与现场领导进行跟踪,以提供反馈并审查缓解工作的状况。在162名参与者中,91人(56.2%)完成了会后调查。在这些回应者中,96.7%的人表示在自己的实践中管理类似病例的信心增加了。许多人还指出,远程医疗资源和工作流程的熟悉程度有所提高。结论:STEPS方法是一种新颖有效的方法,可以同时满足每个模拟场景和整个大型卫生系统中的教育、流程改进和系统集成目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Simulation for Targeted Education, Process Improvement, and Systems Integration (STEPS): A Novel Approach to Health Care Quality Improvement Using In Situ Simulation.

Background: To meet Joint Commission maternal safety standards and facilitate the implementation of acute care obstetrics telemedicine (TeleOB) consultation services throughout one health system, the authors developed a novel in situ simulation framework called STEPS: Simulation for Targeted Education, Process improvement, and Systems integration. STEPS addresses education, process improvement, and systems integration objectives within each simulation scenario, a three-in-one approach to in situ simulation that has not been previously described.

Methods: The STEPS framework was used to design and implement multidisciplinary in situ simulations in six emergency departments and four labor and delivery units in two states. Simulations and debriefs were facilitated by simulation education-trained faculty. Opportunities for improvement (OFIs) were addressed by appropriate leadership teams. Participants provided feedback via a voluntary survey after each simulation session.

Results: A total of 136 OFIs were identified. Many OFIs were observed in more than one simulation session or across multiple sites, but 33 were distinct (9 distinct educational OFIs, 16 distinct process improvement OFIs, and 8 distinct systems integration OFIs). OFIs were assigned to appropriate personnel to design and implement mitigation strategies. Simulation faculty followed up with site leadership about two weeks after each simulation session to provide feedback and review the status of mitigation efforts. Of 162 participants, 91 (56.2%) completed the post-session survey. Of those who responded, 96.7% reported increased confidence in managing similar cases in their own practice. Many also noted improved familiarity with telemedicine resources and workflows.

Conclusion: The STEPS approach is a novel and effective way to simultaneously meet education, process improvement, and systems integration objectives in each simulation scenario and across a large health system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
49 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信