在接受初级保健的患者中按性别划分的健康识别和干预率的社会驱动因素的比较。

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Leah A Holcomb, Elizabeth Crabtree Killen, Kelsey R Ryan, Aimee L McRae-Clark, Stacey Seipel, Rita Aidoo, Constance Guille
{"title":"在接受初级保健的患者中按性别划分的健康识别和干预率的社会驱动因素的比较。","authors":"Leah A Holcomb, Elizabeth Crabtree Killen, Kelsey R Ryan, Aimee L McRae-Clark, Stacey Seipel, Rita Aidoo, Constance Guille","doi":"10.1186/s13293-025-00738-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social drivers of health (SDOH) significantly influence health behaviors and outcomes, yet sex-based disparities in these domains remain underexplored. Identifying these differences is essential for guiding equitable, evidence-based interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed electronic health record (EHR) data from all patients with a documented male or female sex who had a primary care visit or inpatient stay at the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) between January 1, 2023, and December 31, 2024 (n = 493,920). SDOH screening responses were categorized as \"affirmative\" (at risk) or \"negative\" (not at risk) across 17 predefined domains using Epic's logic-based risk classification. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and z-tests for proportions were used to assess sex-based differences. Race and ethnicity were included as descriptive variables; no inferential tests by race/ethnicity were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Females were significantly more likely to report financial strain (7.96%), food insecurity (4.44%), housing instability (3.72%), intimate partner violence (2.03%), transportation barriers (2.20%), depression (3.93%), and stress (14.10%). Despite these risks, females also reported higher rates of protective behaviors such as physical activity (74.2%) and social connectedness (14.22%). In contrast, males had higher rates of alcohol use (4.67%), tobacco use (35.6%), and adolescent substance use (2.14%). Notably, White/Caucasian males reported the highest alcohol use (6.23%), and both White and Black males reported the highest tobacco use (42%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sex-based disparities in SDOH reflect broader structural and social inequities. Health systems should implement routine, EHR-integrated SDOH screening and use this data to inform tailored, gender-responsive interventions-such as increasing access to mental health support for women and addressing substance use among men-while also considering how intersecting factors like race, income, and caregiving burden compound these risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":8890,"journal":{"name":"Biology of Sex Differences","volume":"16 1","pages":"57"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12291404/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of social drivers of health identification and intervention rates by sex among patients receiving primary care.\",\"authors\":\"Leah A Holcomb, Elizabeth Crabtree Killen, Kelsey R Ryan, Aimee L McRae-Clark, Stacey Seipel, Rita Aidoo, Constance Guille\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13293-025-00738-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social drivers of health (SDOH) significantly influence health behaviors and outcomes, yet sex-based disparities in these domains remain underexplored. Identifying these differences is essential for guiding equitable, evidence-based interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed electronic health record (EHR) data from all patients with a documented male or female sex who had a primary care visit or inpatient stay at the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) between January 1, 2023, and December 31, 2024 (n = 493,920). SDOH screening responses were categorized as \\\"affirmative\\\" (at risk) or \\\"negative\\\" (not at risk) across 17 predefined domains using Epic's logic-based risk classification. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and z-tests for proportions were used to assess sex-based differences. Race and ethnicity were included as descriptive variables; no inferential tests by race/ethnicity were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Females were significantly more likely to report financial strain (7.96%), food insecurity (4.44%), housing instability (3.72%), intimate partner violence (2.03%), transportation barriers (2.20%), depression (3.93%), and stress (14.10%). Despite these risks, females also reported higher rates of protective behaviors such as physical activity (74.2%) and social connectedness (14.22%). In contrast, males had higher rates of alcohol use (4.67%), tobacco use (35.6%), and adolescent substance use (2.14%). Notably, White/Caucasian males reported the highest alcohol use (6.23%), and both White and Black males reported the highest tobacco use (42%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sex-based disparities in SDOH reflect broader structural and social inequities. Health systems should implement routine, EHR-integrated SDOH screening and use this data to inform tailored, gender-responsive interventions-such as increasing access to mental health support for women and addressing substance use among men-while also considering how intersecting factors like race, income, and caregiving burden compound these risks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biology of Sex Differences\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12291404/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biology of Sex Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13293-025-00738-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology of Sex Differences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13293-025-00738-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:健康的社会驱动因素(SDOH)显著影响健康行为和结果,但这些领域的性别差异仍未得到充分探讨。识别这些差异对于指导公平、以证据为基础的干预措施至关重要。方法:我们分析了2023年1月1日至2024年12月31日期间在南卡罗来纳医科大学(MUSC)进行初级保健访问或住院的所有有记录的男性或女性患者的电子健康记录(EHR)数据(n = 493,920)。根据Epic基于逻辑的风险分类,SDOH筛选反应在17个预定义领域被分为“肯定”(有风险)或“否定”(无风险)。计算描述性统计量,并使用比例的z检验来评估基于性别的差异。种族和民族被纳入描述变量;没有按种族/民族进行推论检验。结果:女性更倾向于报告经济紧张(7.96%)、食物不安全(4.44%)、住房不稳定(3.72%)、亲密伴侣暴力(2.03%)、交通障碍(2.20%)、抑郁(3.93%)和压力(14.10%)。尽管存在这些风险,女性也报告了更高的保护性行为,如体育活动(74.2%)和社会联系(14.22%)。相比之下,男性的酒精使用率(4.67%)、烟草使用率(35.6%)和青少年药物使用率(2.14%)较高。值得注意的是,白人/高加索男性报告的酒精使用量最高(6.23%),白人和黑人男性报告的烟草使用量最高(42%)。结论:SDOH中基于性别的差异反映了更广泛的结构和社会不平等。卫生系统应实施常规的、与ehr相结合的SDOH筛查,并利用这些数据为量身定制的、性别敏感的干预措施提供信息——例如增加妇女获得精神卫生支持的机会,解决男性药物使用问题——同时考虑种族、收入和护理负担等交叉因素如何加剧这些风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison of social drivers of health identification and intervention rates by sex among patients receiving primary care.

Background: Social drivers of health (SDOH) significantly influence health behaviors and outcomes, yet sex-based disparities in these domains remain underexplored. Identifying these differences is essential for guiding equitable, evidence-based interventions.

Methods: We analyzed electronic health record (EHR) data from all patients with a documented male or female sex who had a primary care visit or inpatient stay at the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) between January 1, 2023, and December 31, 2024 (n = 493,920). SDOH screening responses were categorized as "affirmative" (at risk) or "negative" (not at risk) across 17 predefined domains using Epic's logic-based risk classification. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and z-tests for proportions were used to assess sex-based differences. Race and ethnicity were included as descriptive variables; no inferential tests by race/ethnicity were conducted.

Results: Females were significantly more likely to report financial strain (7.96%), food insecurity (4.44%), housing instability (3.72%), intimate partner violence (2.03%), transportation barriers (2.20%), depression (3.93%), and stress (14.10%). Despite these risks, females also reported higher rates of protective behaviors such as physical activity (74.2%) and social connectedness (14.22%). In contrast, males had higher rates of alcohol use (4.67%), tobacco use (35.6%), and adolescent substance use (2.14%). Notably, White/Caucasian males reported the highest alcohol use (6.23%), and both White and Black males reported the highest tobacco use (42%).

Conclusions: Sex-based disparities in SDOH reflect broader structural and social inequities. Health systems should implement routine, EHR-integrated SDOH screening and use this data to inform tailored, gender-responsive interventions-such as increasing access to mental health support for women and addressing substance use among men-while also considering how intersecting factors like race, income, and caregiving burden compound these risks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biology of Sex Differences
Biology of Sex Differences ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-GENETICS & HEREDITY
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
1.30%
发文量
69
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Biology of Sex Differences is a unique scientific journal focusing on sex differences in physiology, behavior, and disease from molecular to phenotypic levels, incorporating both basic and clinical research. The journal aims to enhance understanding of basic principles and facilitate the development of therapeutic and diagnostic tools specific to sex differences. As an open-access journal, it is the official publication of the Organization for the Study of Sex Differences and co-published by the Society for Women's Health Research. Topical areas include, but are not limited to sex differences in: genomics; the microbiome; epigenetics; molecular and cell biology; tissue biology; physiology; interaction of tissue systems, in any system including adipose, behavioral, cardiovascular, immune, muscular, neural, renal, and skeletal; clinical studies bearing on sex differences in disease or response to therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信