评估人工智能辅助图像解释对临床医生在胸部x线平片上识别气管插管位置的诊断性能的影响:一项多病例多阅读器研究

IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Alex Novak, Sarim Ather, Abdala T. Espinosa Morgado, Giles Maskell, Gordon W. Cowell, Douglas Black, Akshay Shah, James S. Bowness, Amied Shadmaan, Claire Bloomfield, Jason L. Oke, Hilal Johnson, Mark Beggs, Fergus Gleeson, Peter Aylward, Aqib Hafeez, Moustafa Elramlawy, Kin Lam, Benjamin Griffiths, Mirae Harford, Louise Aaron, Claire Seeley, Matthew Luney, James Kirkland, Louise Wing, Zahi Qamhawi, Indrajeet Mandal, Thomas Millard, Michelle Chimbani, Athirah Sharazi, Emma Bryant, Wendy Haithwaite, Aurora Medonica
{"title":"评估人工智能辅助图像解释对临床医生在胸部x线平片上识别气管插管位置的诊断性能的影响:一项多病例多阅读器研究","authors":"Alex Novak, Sarim Ather, Abdala T. Espinosa Morgado, Giles Maskell, Gordon W. Cowell, Douglas Black, Akshay Shah, James S. Bowness, Amied Shadmaan, Claire Bloomfield, Jason L. Oke, Hilal Johnson, Mark Beggs, Fergus Gleeson, Peter Aylward, Aqib Hafeez, Moustafa Elramlawy, Kin Lam, Benjamin Griffiths, Mirae Harford, Louise Aaron, Claire Seeley, Matthew Luney, James Kirkland, Louise Wing, Zahi Qamhawi, Indrajeet Mandal, Thomas Millard, Michelle Chimbani, Athirah Sharazi, Emma Bryant, Wendy Haithwaite, Aurora Medonica","doi":"10.1186/s13054-025-05566-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Incorrectly placed endotracheal tubes (ETTs) can lead to serious clinical harm. Studies have demonstrated the potential for artificial intelligence (AI)-led algorithms to detect ETT placement on chest X-Ray (CXR) images, however their effect on clinician accuracy remains unexplored. This study measured the impact of an AI-assisted ETT detection algorithm on the ability of clinical staff to correctly identify ETT misplacement on CXR images. Four hundred CXRs of intubated adult patients were retrospectively sourced from the John Radcliffe Hospital (Oxford) and two other UK NHS hospitals. Images were de-identified and selected from a range of clinical settings, including the intensive care unit (ICU) and emergency department (ED). Each image was independently reported by a panel of thoracic radiologists, whose consensus classification of ETT placement (correct, too low [distal], or too high [proximal]) served as the reference standard for the study. Correct ETT position was defined as the tip located 3–7 cm above the carina, in line with established guidelines. Eighteen clinical readers of varying seniority from six clinical specialties were recruited across four NHS hospitals. Readers viewed the dataset using an online platform and recorded a blinded classification of ETT position for each image. After a four-week washout period, this was repeated with assistance from an AI-assisted image interpretation tool. Reader accuracy, reported confidence, and timings were measured during each study phase. 14,400 image interpretations were undertaken. Pooled accuracy for tube placement classification improved from 73.6 to 77.4% (p = 0.002). Accuracy for identification of critically misplaced tubes increased from 79.3 to 89.0% (p = 0.001). Reader confidence improved with AI assistance, with no change in mean interpretation time at 36 s per image. Use of assistive AI technology improved accuracy and confidence in interpreting ETT placement on CXR, especially for identification of critically misplaced tubes. AI assistance may potentially provide a useful adjunct to support clinicians in identifying misplaced ETTs on CXR.","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the impact of artificial intelligence-assisted image interpretation on the diagnostic performance of clinicians in identifying endotracheal tube position on plain chest X-ray: a multi-case multi-reader study\",\"authors\":\"Alex Novak, Sarim Ather, Abdala T. Espinosa Morgado, Giles Maskell, Gordon W. Cowell, Douglas Black, Akshay Shah, James S. Bowness, Amied Shadmaan, Claire Bloomfield, Jason L. Oke, Hilal Johnson, Mark Beggs, Fergus Gleeson, Peter Aylward, Aqib Hafeez, Moustafa Elramlawy, Kin Lam, Benjamin Griffiths, Mirae Harford, Louise Aaron, Claire Seeley, Matthew Luney, James Kirkland, Louise Wing, Zahi Qamhawi, Indrajeet Mandal, Thomas Millard, Michelle Chimbani, Athirah Sharazi, Emma Bryant, Wendy Haithwaite, Aurora Medonica\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13054-025-05566-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Incorrectly placed endotracheal tubes (ETTs) can lead to serious clinical harm. Studies have demonstrated the potential for artificial intelligence (AI)-led algorithms to detect ETT placement on chest X-Ray (CXR) images, however their effect on clinician accuracy remains unexplored. This study measured the impact of an AI-assisted ETT detection algorithm on the ability of clinical staff to correctly identify ETT misplacement on CXR images. Four hundred CXRs of intubated adult patients were retrospectively sourced from the John Radcliffe Hospital (Oxford) and two other UK NHS hospitals. Images were de-identified and selected from a range of clinical settings, including the intensive care unit (ICU) and emergency department (ED). Each image was independently reported by a panel of thoracic radiologists, whose consensus classification of ETT placement (correct, too low [distal], or too high [proximal]) served as the reference standard for the study. Correct ETT position was defined as the tip located 3–7 cm above the carina, in line with established guidelines. Eighteen clinical readers of varying seniority from six clinical specialties were recruited across four NHS hospitals. Readers viewed the dataset using an online platform and recorded a blinded classification of ETT position for each image. After a four-week washout period, this was repeated with assistance from an AI-assisted image interpretation tool. Reader accuracy, reported confidence, and timings were measured during each study phase. 14,400 image interpretations were undertaken. Pooled accuracy for tube placement classification improved from 73.6 to 77.4% (p = 0.002). Accuracy for identification of critically misplaced tubes increased from 79.3 to 89.0% (p = 0.001). Reader confidence improved with AI assistance, with no change in mean interpretation time at 36 s per image. Use of assistive AI technology improved accuracy and confidence in interpreting ETT placement on CXR, especially for identification of critically misplaced tubes. AI assistance may potentially provide a useful adjunct to support clinicians in identifying misplaced ETTs on CXR.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05566-6\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05566-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

气管内管放置不正确会导致严重的临床伤害。研究表明,人工智能(AI)主导的算法有潜力在胸部x射线(CXR)图像上检测ETT的位置,但它们对临床医生准确性的影响仍未探索。本研究测量了人工智能辅助ETT检测算法对临床工作人员正确识别CXR图像上ETT错位的能力的影响。400例插管成人患者的cxr回顾性地来自约翰拉德克利夫医院(牛津)和另外两家英国NHS医院。图像被去识别并从一系列临床环境中选择,包括重症监护病房(ICU)和急诊科(ED)。每张图像由一组胸科放射科医生独立报告,他们对ETT放置的共识分类(正确、过低[远端]或过高[近端])作为研究的参考标准。正确的ETT位置定义为针尖位于隆突上方3-7厘米,符合既定的指导方针。来自6个临床专业的18名不同资历的临床读者被招募到4家NHS医院。读者使用在线平台查看数据集,并记录每张图像的ETT位置的盲法分类。经过四周的冲洗期后,在人工智能辅助图像解释工具的帮助下重复了这一过程。在每个研究阶段测量读者的准确性、报告的置信度和时间。进行了14,400次图像解译。导管放置分类的汇总准确率从73.6%提高到77.4% (p = 0.002)。鉴别严重错位管的准确率从79.3%提高到89.0% (p = 0.001)。在人工智能的帮助下,读者的信心得到了提高,每张图像的平均解释时间为36秒,没有变化。辅助人工智能技术的使用提高了在CXR上解释ETT放置的准确性和信心,特别是在识别严重错位的管时。人工智能辅助可能会提供一个有用的辅助手段,以支持临床医生在CXR中识别错位的ett。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the impact of artificial intelligence-assisted image interpretation on the diagnostic performance of clinicians in identifying endotracheal tube position on plain chest X-ray: a multi-case multi-reader study
Incorrectly placed endotracheal tubes (ETTs) can lead to serious clinical harm. Studies have demonstrated the potential for artificial intelligence (AI)-led algorithms to detect ETT placement on chest X-Ray (CXR) images, however their effect on clinician accuracy remains unexplored. This study measured the impact of an AI-assisted ETT detection algorithm on the ability of clinical staff to correctly identify ETT misplacement on CXR images. Four hundred CXRs of intubated adult patients were retrospectively sourced from the John Radcliffe Hospital (Oxford) and two other UK NHS hospitals. Images were de-identified and selected from a range of clinical settings, including the intensive care unit (ICU) and emergency department (ED). Each image was independently reported by a panel of thoracic radiologists, whose consensus classification of ETT placement (correct, too low [distal], or too high [proximal]) served as the reference standard for the study. Correct ETT position was defined as the tip located 3–7 cm above the carina, in line with established guidelines. Eighteen clinical readers of varying seniority from six clinical specialties were recruited across four NHS hospitals. Readers viewed the dataset using an online platform and recorded a blinded classification of ETT position for each image. After a four-week washout period, this was repeated with assistance from an AI-assisted image interpretation tool. Reader accuracy, reported confidence, and timings were measured during each study phase. 14,400 image interpretations were undertaken. Pooled accuracy for tube placement classification improved from 73.6 to 77.4% (p = 0.002). Accuracy for identification of critically misplaced tubes increased from 79.3 to 89.0% (p = 0.001). Reader confidence improved with AI assistance, with no change in mean interpretation time at 36 s per image. Use of assistive AI technology improved accuracy and confidence in interpreting ETT placement on CXR, especially for identification of critically misplaced tubes. AI assistance may potentially provide a useful adjunct to support clinicians in identifying misplaced ETTs on CXR.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care
Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
20.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
348
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care is an esteemed international medical journal that undergoes a rigorous peer-review process to maintain its high quality standards. Its primary objective is to enhance the healthcare services offered to critically ill patients. To achieve this, the journal focuses on gathering, exchanging, disseminating, and endorsing evidence-based information that is highly relevant to intensivists. By doing so, Critical Care seeks to provide a thorough and inclusive examination of the intensive care field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信