使用SEIPS 101工具模拟手术计数过程。

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Julia Meilan, Connor Lusk, Elizabeth K Galinsky, Megan McCray, Matthew T Nare, William Shelton, Bruce Crookes, Ken Catchpole
{"title":"使用SEIPS 101工具模拟手术计数过程。","authors":"Julia Meilan, Connor Lusk, Elizabeth K Galinsky, Megan McCray, Matthew T Nare, William Shelton, Bruce Crookes, Ken Catchpole","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Retained foreign objects (RFOs) are a frequent sentinel event that may cause significant harm to patients. The surgical count is the primary prevention measure for RFOs, yet there has been limited research into the system factors that interact in this process. The objective of this study is to create SEIPS 101 tools that help to better understand the contributing systems factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Trained researchers directly observed the count process in 22 general and gynecological surgical cases and collected data including the people; tasks; tools; environmental; and organizational factors. Ad hoc in situ interviews were conducted as the tools were being iteratively constructed during observations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The journey map found 6 different phases of the counting process, conducted in 4 different environments, consisting of multiple tasks performed by 3 OR team members. The people map identified 8 people influencing the counting process, many requiring bidirectional communication. The tasks and tools matrix found 4 high-frequency use tools across key tasks, with medium to low ease of access and/or usability. The PETT scan revealed 56 individual barriers and 31 individual facilitators.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results reveal the variety of systems factors and their complex interactions during the count process, challenge current thinking in RFO avoidance, and reveal new ways to intervene. They demonstrate the hidden contribution that resilience plays in prevention and how not only adhering to count policies and best practice guidelines can prevent RFOs, which by necessity challenges the value of deviations, adaptations, and descriptions of error as a reasonable explanation to why RFOs occur.</p>","PeriodicalId":48901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12515489/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using SEIPS 101 Tools to Model Surgical Count Processes.\",\"authors\":\"Julia Meilan, Connor Lusk, Elizabeth K Galinsky, Megan McCray, Matthew T Nare, William Shelton, Bruce Crookes, Ken Catchpole\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001386\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Retained foreign objects (RFOs) are a frequent sentinel event that may cause significant harm to patients. The surgical count is the primary prevention measure for RFOs, yet there has been limited research into the system factors that interact in this process. The objective of this study is to create SEIPS 101 tools that help to better understand the contributing systems factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Trained researchers directly observed the count process in 22 general and gynecological surgical cases and collected data including the people; tasks; tools; environmental; and organizational factors. Ad hoc in situ interviews were conducted as the tools were being iteratively constructed during observations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The journey map found 6 different phases of the counting process, conducted in 4 different environments, consisting of multiple tasks performed by 3 OR team members. The people map identified 8 people influencing the counting process, many requiring bidirectional communication. The tasks and tools matrix found 4 high-frequency use tools across key tasks, with medium to low ease of access and/or usability. The PETT scan revealed 56 individual barriers and 31 individual facilitators.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results reveal the variety of systems factors and their complex interactions during the count process, challenge current thinking in RFO avoidance, and reveal new ways to intervene. They demonstrate the hidden contribution that resilience plays in prevention and how not only adhering to count policies and best practice guidelines can prevent RFOs, which by necessity challenges the value of deviations, adaptations, and descriptions of error as a reasonable explanation to why RFOs occur.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Patient Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12515489/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Patient Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001386\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001386","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:残留异物(RFOs)是一种常见的前哨事件,可能对患者造成重大伤害。手术计数是rfo的主要预防措施,但对这一过程中相互作用的系统因素的研究有限。本研究的目的是创建有助于更好地理解系统因素的SEIPS 101工具。方法:训练有素的研究人员直接观察22例普科及妇科手术病例的计数过程,收集包括人群在内的数据;任务;工具;环境;还有组织因素。在观察期间反复构建工具时,进行了临时现场访谈。结果:旅程图发现了计数过程的6个不同阶段,在4种不同的环境中进行,由3名OR团队成员执行的多项任务组成。人员图确定了8个影响计数过程的人,其中许多人需要双向沟通。任务和工具矩阵发现了4个跨关键任务的高频使用工具,它们具有中低的易用性和/或可用性。pet扫描显示56个个体障碍和31个个体促进者。结论:我们的研究结果揭示了计数过程中各种系统因素及其复杂的相互作用,挑战了目前对RFO规避的看法,并揭示了新的干预方法。它们展示了复原力在预防中发挥的隐性贡献,以及如何不仅坚持计数政策和最佳实践指南可以预防rfo,这必然会挑战偏差、适应和错误描述作为rfo发生原因的合理解释的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using SEIPS 101 Tools to Model Surgical Count Processes.

Objectives: Retained foreign objects (RFOs) are a frequent sentinel event that may cause significant harm to patients. The surgical count is the primary prevention measure for RFOs, yet there has been limited research into the system factors that interact in this process. The objective of this study is to create SEIPS 101 tools that help to better understand the contributing systems factors.

Methods: Trained researchers directly observed the count process in 22 general and gynecological surgical cases and collected data including the people; tasks; tools; environmental; and organizational factors. Ad hoc in situ interviews were conducted as the tools were being iteratively constructed during observations.

Results: The journey map found 6 different phases of the counting process, conducted in 4 different environments, consisting of multiple tasks performed by 3 OR team members. The people map identified 8 people influencing the counting process, many requiring bidirectional communication. The tasks and tools matrix found 4 high-frequency use tools across key tasks, with medium to low ease of access and/or usability. The PETT scan revealed 56 individual barriers and 31 individual facilitators.

Conclusions: Our results reveal the variety of systems factors and their complex interactions during the count process, challenge current thinking in RFO avoidance, and reveal new ways to intervene. They demonstrate the hidden contribution that resilience plays in prevention and how not only adhering to count policies and best practice guidelines can prevent RFOs, which by necessity challenges the value of deviations, adaptations, and descriptions of error as a reasonable explanation to why RFOs occur.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Safety
Journal of Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Journal of Patient Safety (ISSN 1549-8417; online ISSN 1549-8425) is dedicated to presenting research advances and field applications in every area of patient safety. While Journal of Patient Safety has a research emphasis, it also publishes articles describing near-miss opportunities, system modifications that are barriers to error, and the impact of regulatory changes on healthcare delivery. This mix of research and real-world findings makes Journal of Patient Safety a valuable resource across the breadth of health professions and from bench to bedside.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信