外伤性硬膜下血肿的神经外科手术:创伤中心变异与患者预后的关系。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Vikas N Vattipally, Kathleen R Ran, Debraj Mukherjee, Jose I Suarez, Judy Huang, Chetan Bettegowda, Elliott R Haut, Joseph V Sakran, Christopher Witiw, David Gomez, Tej D Azad, James P Byrne
{"title":"外伤性硬膜下血肿的神经外科手术:创伤中心变异与患者预后的关系。","authors":"Vikas N Vattipally, Kathleen R Ran, Debraj Mukherjee, Jose I Suarez, Judy Huang, Chetan Bettegowda, Elliott R Haut, Joseph V Sakran, Christopher Witiw, David Gomez, Tej D Azad, James P Byrne","doi":"10.3171/2025.3.JNS242811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Traumatic subdural hematoma (SDH) is a common form of traumatic brain injury (TBI) that often represents a neurosurgical emergency. Surgical evacuation is recommended for SDH with midline shift (MLS) > 5 mm, regardless of the presenting Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score; however, real-world practice is unknown. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that significant variation exists in the tendency for operative neurosurgical intervention for traumatic SDH among trauma centers (TCs) and that this variation is associated with patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors performed a retrospective cohort study of adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) treated for blunt severe TBI (GCS score ≤ 8) and SDH with MLS > 5 mm at level I and II TCs participating in the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2017-2019). Patients with nonsurvivable injuries (Abbreviated Injury Scale score 6), advance directives, or emergency department death were excluded. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to estimate each TC's unique odds of performing operative neurosurgery for traumatic SDH. Risk adjustment accounted for patient baseline and injury characteristics. TCs were grouped into quartiles of increasing tendency for neurosurgery. The risk-adjusted association between TC tendency for operative neurosurgery and outcomes was then measured. The primary outcome was inpatient mortality. The secondary outcome was favorable discharge, defined as discharge to home or rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The authors identified 13,087 patients with traumatic SDH treated at 454 level I and II TCs. Significant variation in TC tendency for operative neurosurgery was observed. Specifically, TCs with the greatest tendency for neurosurgical intervention (quartile 4) performed surgery on 60% of patients, whereas TCs with the lowest tendency (quartile 1) performed surgery on only 26%, even though there were no differences in GCS scores or pupillary examination findings. After risk adjustment, a greater hospital tendency for neurosurgical intervention was associated with lower inpatient mortality and higher odds of favorable discharge. Patients with traumatic SDH treated at TCs with the highest versus the lowest tendency for neurosurgery were 30% less likely to die (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.7, 95% CI 0.6-0.8) and more likely to have a favorable discharge (aOR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.6). These effects were most pronounced among patients with abnormal pupillary examination findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant variation exists between trauma centers in performing operative neurosurgery for traumatic SDH. The TCs more likely to perform surgery were associated with lower odds of inpatient mortality and higher odds of a favorable discharge. Consensus-based guidelines are needed to improve standardization in the care of patients with traumatic SDH.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Operative neurosurgery for traumatic subdural hematoma: association between trauma center variation and patient outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Vikas N Vattipally, Kathleen R Ran, Debraj Mukherjee, Jose I Suarez, Judy Huang, Chetan Bettegowda, Elliott R Haut, Joseph V Sakran, Christopher Witiw, David Gomez, Tej D Azad, James P Byrne\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2025.3.JNS242811\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Traumatic subdural hematoma (SDH) is a common form of traumatic brain injury (TBI) that often represents a neurosurgical emergency. Surgical evacuation is recommended for SDH with midline shift (MLS) > 5 mm, regardless of the presenting Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score; however, real-world practice is unknown. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that significant variation exists in the tendency for operative neurosurgical intervention for traumatic SDH among trauma centers (TCs) and that this variation is associated with patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors performed a retrospective cohort study of adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) treated for blunt severe TBI (GCS score ≤ 8) and SDH with MLS > 5 mm at level I and II TCs participating in the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2017-2019). Patients with nonsurvivable injuries (Abbreviated Injury Scale score 6), advance directives, or emergency department death were excluded. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to estimate each TC's unique odds of performing operative neurosurgery for traumatic SDH. Risk adjustment accounted for patient baseline and injury characteristics. TCs were grouped into quartiles of increasing tendency for neurosurgery. The risk-adjusted association between TC tendency for operative neurosurgery and outcomes was then measured. The primary outcome was inpatient mortality. The secondary outcome was favorable discharge, defined as discharge to home or rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The authors identified 13,087 patients with traumatic SDH treated at 454 level I and II TCs. Significant variation in TC tendency for operative neurosurgery was observed. Specifically, TCs with the greatest tendency for neurosurgical intervention (quartile 4) performed surgery on 60% of patients, whereas TCs with the lowest tendency (quartile 1) performed surgery on only 26%, even though there were no differences in GCS scores or pupillary examination findings. After risk adjustment, a greater hospital tendency for neurosurgical intervention was associated with lower inpatient mortality and higher odds of favorable discharge. Patients with traumatic SDH treated at TCs with the highest versus the lowest tendency for neurosurgery were 30% less likely to die (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.7, 95% CI 0.6-0.8) and more likely to have a favorable discharge (aOR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.6). These effects were most pronounced among patients with abnormal pupillary examination findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant variation exists between trauma centers in performing operative neurosurgery for traumatic SDH. The TCs more likely to perform surgery were associated with lower odds of inpatient mortality and higher odds of a favorable discharge. Consensus-based guidelines are needed to improve standardization in the care of patients with traumatic SDH.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.3.JNS242811\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.3.JNS242811","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:外伤性硬膜下血肿(SDH)是一种常见的外伤性脑损伤(TBI),通常是神经外科的急症。对于中线移位(MLS)为0.5 mm的SDH,无论目前的格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)如何,都建议进行手术切除;然而,现实世界的实践是未知的。本研究的目的是验证创伤中心(tc)对外伤性SDH的手术神经外科干预倾向存在显著差异的假设,并且这种差异与患者预后相关。方法:作者对参加美国外科医师学会创伤质量改善计划(2017-2019)的钝性重度TBI (GCS评分≤8)和SDH治疗的成人患者(年龄≥18岁)进行了回顾性队列研究,这些患者在I级和II级TCs中MLS > 5 mm。无法存活的损伤(简易损伤量表评分6)、预先指示或急诊科死亡的患者被排除在外。使用分层逻辑回归来估计每个TC对外伤性SDH进行手术神经外科手术的独特几率。风险调整考虑了患者基线和损伤特征。TCs被分为神经外科倾向增加的四分位数。然后测量经风险调整的神经外科手术TC倾向与预后之间的关联。主要终点是住院病人死亡率。次要结局是良好的出院,定义为出院回家或康复。结果:作者确定了13087例外伤性SDH患者,454例I级和II级tc治疗。神经外科手术中TC倾向有显著差异。具体来说,即使GCS评分或瞳孔检查结果没有差异,神经外科干预倾向最大的tc(四分位数4)对60%的患者进行了手术,而倾向最低的tc(四分位数1)仅对26%的患者进行了手术。风险调整后,更大的医院倾向于神经外科干预与更低的住院死亡率和更高的出院几率相关。外伤性SDH患者在神经外科倾向最高和最低的TCs治疗时,死亡的可能性降低30%(调整优势比[aOR] 0.7, 95% CI 0.6-0.8),出院的可能性更大(aOR为1.3,95% CI为1.1-1.6)。这些影响在瞳孔检查结果异常的患者中最为明显。结论:不同创伤中心对外伤性SDH的神经外科手术治疗存在显著差异。更有可能进行手术的tc与住院死亡率较低的几率和良好出院的几率较高有关。需要基于共识的指南来提高创伤性SDH患者护理的标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Operative neurosurgery for traumatic subdural hematoma: association between trauma center variation and patient outcomes.

Objective: Traumatic subdural hematoma (SDH) is a common form of traumatic brain injury (TBI) that often represents a neurosurgical emergency. Surgical evacuation is recommended for SDH with midline shift (MLS) > 5 mm, regardless of the presenting Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score; however, real-world practice is unknown. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that significant variation exists in the tendency for operative neurosurgical intervention for traumatic SDH among trauma centers (TCs) and that this variation is associated with patient outcomes.

Methods: The authors performed a retrospective cohort study of adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) treated for blunt severe TBI (GCS score ≤ 8) and SDH with MLS > 5 mm at level I and II TCs participating in the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2017-2019). Patients with nonsurvivable injuries (Abbreviated Injury Scale score 6), advance directives, or emergency department death were excluded. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to estimate each TC's unique odds of performing operative neurosurgery for traumatic SDH. Risk adjustment accounted for patient baseline and injury characteristics. TCs were grouped into quartiles of increasing tendency for neurosurgery. The risk-adjusted association between TC tendency for operative neurosurgery and outcomes was then measured. The primary outcome was inpatient mortality. The secondary outcome was favorable discharge, defined as discharge to home or rehabilitation.

Results: The authors identified 13,087 patients with traumatic SDH treated at 454 level I and II TCs. Significant variation in TC tendency for operative neurosurgery was observed. Specifically, TCs with the greatest tendency for neurosurgical intervention (quartile 4) performed surgery on 60% of patients, whereas TCs with the lowest tendency (quartile 1) performed surgery on only 26%, even though there were no differences in GCS scores or pupillary examination findings. After risk adjustment, a greater hospital tendency for neurosurgical intervention was associated with lower inpatient mortality and higher odds of favorable discharge. Patients with traumatic SDH treated at TCs with the highest versus the lowest tendency for neurosurgery were 30% less likely to die (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.7, 95% CI 0.6-0.8) and more likely to have a favorable discharge (aOR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.6). These effects were most pronounced among patients with abnormal pupillary examination findings.

Conclusions: Significant variation exists between trauma centers in performing operative neurosurgery for traumatic SDH. The TCs more likely to perform surgery were associated with lower odds of inpatient mortality and higher odds of a favorable discharge. Consensus-based guidelines are needed to improve standardization in the care of patients with traumatic SDH.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信