从中国企业层面数据估算往返FDI

IF 0.5 4区 经济学 Q4 ECONOMICS
Zeyi Qian, Junfu Zhang, Qiangyuan Chen
{"title":"从中国企业层面数据估算往返FDI","authors":"Zeyi Qian,&nbsp;Junfu Zhang,&nbsp;Qiangyuan Chen","doi":"10.1002/ise3.102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>When capital leaves a country and then flows back as foreign direct investment (FDI), we call it round-tripping FDI. It is widely suspected that China's official FDI statistics contain a substantial amount of round-tripping FDI. However, it is difficult to quantify the round-tripping FDI due to the lack of data. In this paper, we propose two methods to identify round-tripping FDI. The first one tracks capital flows at the firm level. If a firm in China invests in a foreign firm and this foreign firm makes an investment back to China shortly after, then we consider this investment to China as round-tripping FDI. Our second measure of round-tripping FDI adds to the first measure by including investments in China made by Chinese investors registered in tax havens. The first estimate of round-tripping FDI accounts for up to 3% of China's total FDI from 1999 to 2015, whereas the second estimate accounts for up to 70% in the period. Our firm-level analysis shows that industrial firms facing higher tax burdens are more likely to make round-tripping FDI. We also show that at the city level, adjusted FDI statistics by subtracting the estimated round-tripping FDI are better predictors of imports and exports. Finally, we show that provinces receiving higher shares of round-tripping FDI are more likely to be punished for illegal financial activities. Taken together, these findings suggest that our measures of round-tripping FDI, although noisy, are indicative of real transactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":29662,"journal":{"name":"International Studies of Economics","volume":"20 2","pages":"138-152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ise3.102","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating Round-Tripping FDI from Firm-Level Data in China\",\"authors\":\"Zeyi Qian,&nbsp;Junfu Zhang,&nbsp;Qiangyuan Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ise3.102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>When capital leaves a country and then flows back as foreign direct investment (FDI), we call it round-tripping FDI. It is widely suspected that China's official FDI statistics contain a substantial amount of round-tripping FDI. However, it is difficult to quantify the round-tripping FDI due to the lack of data. In this paper, we propose two methods to identify round-tripping FDI. The first one tracks capital flows at the firm level. If a firm in China invests in a foreign firm and this foreign firm makes an investment back to China shortly after, then we consider this investment to China as round-tripping FDI. Our second measure of round-tripping FDI adds to the first measure by including investments in China made by Chinese investors registered in tax havens. The first estimate of round-tripping FDI accounts for up to 3% of China's total FDI from 1999 to 2015, whereas the second estimate accounts for up to 70% in the period. Our firm-level analysis shows that industrial firms facing higher tax burdens are more likely to make round-tripping FDI. We also show that at the city level, adjusted FDI statistics by subtracting the estimated round-tripping FDI are better predictors of imports and exports. Finally, we show that provinces receiving higher shares of round-tripping FDI are more likely to be punished for illegal financial activities. Taken together, these findings suggest that our measures of round-tripping FDI, although noisy, are indicative of real transactions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Studies of Economics\",\"volume\":\"20 2\",\"pages\":\"138-152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ise3.102\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Studies of Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ise3.102\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Studies of Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ise3.102","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当资本离开一个国家,然后以外国直接投资(FDI)的形式回流时,我们称之为往返FDI。人们普遍怀疑,中国的官方FDI统计数据中包含了大量的往返FDI。然而,由于缺乏数据,很难对往返外国直接投资进行量化。在本文中,我们提出了两种识别往返FDI的方法。第一个模型追踪公司层面的资本流动。如果中国的一家公司向一家外国公司投资,而这家外国公司不久之后又向中国投资,那么我们认为这种对中国的投资是往返FDI。我们对往返外国直接投资的第二个衡量标准是对第一个衡量标准的补充,它包括了在避税天堂注册的中国投资者在中国的投资。1999年至2015年期间,第一种估计的往返FDI占中国总FDI的3%,而第二种估计占同期总FDI的70%。我们的企业层面分析表明,面临较高税负的工业企业更有可能进行往返FDI。我们还表明,在城市层面,通过减去估计的往返FDI调整后的FDI统计数据可以更好地预测进出口。最后,我们的研究表明,获得较高往返FDI份额的省份更有可能因非法金融活动而受到惩罚。综上所述,这些发现表明,我们对往返外国直接投资(FDI)的衡量方法,尽管嘈杂,但却表明了真实的交易。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Estimating Round-Tripping FDI from Firm-Level Data in China

Estimating Round-Tripping FDI from Firm-Level Data in China

When capital leaves a country and then flows back as foreign direct investment (FDI), we call it round-tripping FDI. It is widely suspected that China's official FDI statistics contain a substantial amount of round-tripping FDI. However, it is difficult to quantify the round-tripping FDI due to the lack of data. In this paper, we propose two methods to identify round-tripping FDI. The first one tracks capital flows at the firm level. If a firm in China invests in a foreign firm and this foreign firm makes an investment back to China shortly after, then we consider this investment to China as round-tripping FDI. Our second measure of round-tripping FDI adds to the first measure by including investments in China made by Chinese investors registered in tax havens. The first estimate of round-tripping FDI accounts for up to 3% of China's total FDI from 1999 to 2015, whereas the second estimate accounts for up to 70% in the period. Our firm-level analysis shows that industrial firms facing higher tax burdens are more likely to make round-tripping FDI. We also show that at the city level, adjusted FDI statistics by subtracting the estimated round-tripping FDI are better predictors of imports and exports. Finally, we show that provinces receiving higher shares of round-tripping FDI are more likely to be punished for illegal financial activities. Taken together, these findings suggest that our measures of round-tripping FDI, although noisy, are indicative of real transactions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信