用二元决策图求二次型背包问题的紧上界和下界

IF 4.3 2区 工程技术 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
M. Eliass Fennich , Leandro C. Coelho , Franklin Djeumou Fomeni
{"title":"用二元决策图求二次型背包问题的紧上界和下界","authors":"M. Eliass Fennich ,&nbsp;Leandro C. Coelho ,&nbsp;Franklin Djeumou Fomeni","doi":"10.1016/j.cor.2025.107197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Quadratic Knapsack Problem (QKP) is a challenging combinatorial optimization problem that has attracted significant attention due to its complexity and practical applications. In recent years, Binary Decision Diagrams (BDDs) have emerged as a powerful tool in combinatorial optimization, providing efficient bounds. In the literature of the QKP, all the exact methods are based on computing tight bounds before applying branch-and-bound (B&amp;B) schemes. We advance this literature in this work by leveraging BDDs to compute bounds more effectively. We propose a novel integration of dual-bound tightening within a BDD-based B&amp;B framework, employing a Breadth-First Search (BFS) strategy. Our approach addresses the critical limitation of existing BDD-based B&amp;B methods, which often lack robust dual-bound tightening mechanisms. Furthermore, we propose several efficient compilation techniques of BDDs for the QKP. Through extensive experimentation on several categories of QKP instances, we demonstrate that our method competes and often surpasses the bounding stages of the leading exact algorithms. Notably, our approach reduces the average duality gap by up to 10% for the class of Hidden Clique QKP instances, showcasing its potential. Furthermore, our findings indicate that the BFS B&amp;B method outperforms state-of-the-art BDD B&amp;B approaches across all tested QKP instances, highlighting its effectiveness and potential for broader application.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10542,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Operations Research","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 107197"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tight upper and lower bounds for the quadratic knapsack problem through binary decision diagrams\",\"authors\":\"M. Eliass Fennich ,&nbsp;Leandro C. Coelho ,&nbsp;Franklin Djeumou Fomeni\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cor.2025.107197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Quadratic Knapsack Problem (QKP) is a challenging combinatorial optimization problem that has attracted significant attention due to its complexity and practical applications. In recent years, Binary Decision Diagrams (BDDs) have emerged as a powerful tool in combinatorial optimization, providing efficient bounds. In the literature of the QKP, all the exact methods are based on computing tight bounds before applying branch-and-bound (B&amp;B) schemes. We advance this literature in this work by leveraging BDDs to compute bounds more effectively. We propose a novel integration of dual-bound tightening within a BDD-based B&amp;B framework, employing a Breadth-First Search (BFS) strategy. Our approach addresses the critical limitation of existing BDD-based B&amp;B methods, which often lack robust dual-bound tightening mechanisms. Furthermore, we propose several efficient compilation techniques of BDDs for the QKP. Through extensive experimentation on several categories of QKP instances, we demonstrate that our method competes and often surpasses the bounding stages of the leading exact algorithms. Notably, our approach reduces the average duality gap by up to 10% for the class of Hidden Clique QKP instances, showcasing its potential. Furthermore, our findings indicate that the BFS B&amp;B method outperforms state-of-the-art BDD B&amp;B approaches across all tested QKP instances, highlighting its effectiveness and potential for broader application.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers & Operations Research\",\"volume\":\"184 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107197\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers & Operations Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305054825002254\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Operations Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305054825002254","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

二次背包问题(Quadratic backpack Problem, QKP)是一个极具挑战性的组合优化问题,因其复杂性和实际应用而备受关注。近年来,二元决策图(bdd)作为组合优化的有力工具,提供了有效的边界。在QKP的文献中,所有的精确方法都是基于在应用分支定界(B&;B)格式之前计算紧界。在这项工作中,我们通过利用bdd更有效地计算边界来推进这一文献。我们在基于bdd的B&;B框架中提出了一种新的双界收紧集成,采用广度优先搜索(BFS)策略。我们的方法解决了现有基于bdd的B&;B方法的关键限制,这些方法通常缺乏健壮的双界紧固机制。此外,我们还提出了几种有效的QKP bdd编译技术。通过对几个类别的QKP实例进行广泛的实验,我们证明了我们的方法与领先的精确算法的边界阶段相竞争,并且经常超过这些算法。值得注意的是,我们的方法将Hidden Clique QKP实例类的平均对偶性差距减少了10%,显示了它的潜力。此外,我们的研究结果表明,在所有测试的QKP实例中,BFS B&;B方法优于最先进的BDD B&;B方法,突出了其有效性和更广泛应用的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tight upper and lower bounds for the quadratic knapsack problem through binary decision diagrams
The Quadratic Knapsack Problem (QKP) is a challenging combinatorial optimization problem that has attracted significant attention due to its complexity and practical applications. In recent years, Binary Decision Diagrams (BDDs) have emerged as a powerful tool in combinatorial optimization, providing efficient bounds. In the literature of the QKP, all the exact methods are based on computing tight bounds before applying branch-and-bound (B&B) schemes. We advance this literature in this work by leveraging BDDs to compute bounds more effectively. We propose a novel integration of dual-bound tightening within a BDD-based B&B framework, employing a Breadth-First Search (BFS) strategy. Our approach addresses the critical limitation of existing BDD-based B&B methods, which often lack robust dual-bound tightening mechanisms. Furthermore, we propose several efficient compilation techniques of BDDs for the QKP. Through extensive experimentation on several categories of QKP instances, we demonstrate that our method competes and often surpasses the bounding stages of the leading exact algorithms. Notably, our approach reduces the average duality gap by up to 10% for the class of Hidden Clique QKP instances, showcasing its potential. Furthermore, our findings indicate that the BFS B&B method outperforms state-of-the-art BDD B&B approaches across all tested QKP instances, highlighting its effectiveness and potential for broader application.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Operations Research
Computers & Operations Research 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
292
审稿时长
8.5 months
期刊介绍: Operations research and computers meet in a large number of scientific fields, many of which are of vital current concern to our troubled society. These include, among others, ecology, transportation, safety, reliability, urban planning, economics, inventory control, investment strategy and logistics (including reverse logistics). Computers & Operations Research provides an international forum for the application of computers and operations research techniques to problems in these and related fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信