Maksim Belitski, Yelena Kalyuzhnova, Rifat Kamasak, Benjamin Laker
{"title":"制度、资源依赖与企业国际化中腐败的两重性","authors":"Maksim Belitski, Yelena Kalyuzhnova, Rifat Kamasak, Benjamin Laker","doi":"10.1177/00187267251355390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite extensive research on institutions and firm internationalisation, the joint firm and macro-level effects of informal relationships, that is, corruption, on firm internationalisation, particularly within specific industrial contexts (resource-based vs. non-resource industries), remain underexplored. To investigate how firms internationalise under 2 boundary conditions – resource dependency and variations in institutional quality – we apply the Heckman-type selection bias and use 186,027 firms spread across 137 countries, with data collected through multiple firm surveys conducted by the World Bank Enterprise Surveys between 2006 and 2024. Our empirical findings demonstrate the double-edged sword of corruption. While it positively affects firm exports by mitigating bureaucratic procedures at the managerial level, the effect on exports turns negative as it increases uncertainty and operational costs at the macro-level. The effects are accelerated for firms in resource-based sectors. We highlight the interplay between corruption, resource dependencies and internationalisation and provide targeted policy and practical implications.","PeriodicalId":48433,"journal":{"name":"Human Relations","volume":"286 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Institutions, resource dependence and the dual nature of corruption in firm internationalisation\",\"authors\":\"Maksim Belitski, Yelena Kalyuzhnova, Rifat Kamasak, Benjamin Laker\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00187267251355390\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite extensive research on institutions and firm internationalisation, the joint firm and macro-level effects of informal relationships, that is, corruption, on firm internationalisation, particularly within specific industrial contexts (resource-based vs. non-resource industries), remain underexplored. To investigate how firms internationalise under 2 boundary conditions – resource dependency and variations in institutional quality – we apply the Heckman-type selection bias and use 186,027 firms spread across 137 countries, with data collected through multiple firm surveys conducted by the World Bank Enterprise Surveys between 2006 and 2024. Our empirical findings demonstrate the double-edged sword of corruption. While it positively affects firm exports by mitigating bureaucratic procedures at the managerial level, the effect on exports turns negative as it increases uncertainty and operational costs at the macro-level. The effects are accelerated for firms in resource-based sectors. We highlight the interplay between corruption, resource dependencies and internationalisation and provide targeted policy and practical implications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48433,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Relations\",\"volume\":\"286 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267251355390\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Relations","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267251355390","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
Institutions, resource dependence and the dual nature of corruption in firm internationalisation
Despite extensive research on institutions and firm internationalisation, the joint firm and macro-level effects of informal relationships, that is, corruption, on firm internationalisation, particularly within specific industrial contexts (resource-based vs. non-resource industries), remain underexplored. To investigate how firms internationalise under 2 boundary conditions – resource dependency and variations in institutional quality – we apply the Heckman-type selection bias and use 186,027 firms spread across 137 countries, with data collected through multiple firm surveys conducted by the World Bank Enterprise Surveys between 2006 and 2024. Our empirical findings demonstrate the double-edged sword of corruption. While it positively affects firm exports by mitigating bureaucratic procedures at the managerial level, the effect on exports turns negative as it increases uncertainty and operational costs at the macro-level. The effects are accelerated for firms in resource-based sectors. We highlight the interplay between corruption, resource dependencies and internationalisation and provide targeted policy and practical implications.
期刊介绍:
Human Relations is an international peer reviewed journal, which publishes the highest quality original research to advance our understanding of social relationships at and around work through theoretical development and empirical investigation. Scope Human Relations seeks high quality research papers that extend our knowledge of social relationships at work and organizational forms, practices and processes that affect the nature, structure and conditions of work and work organizations. Human Relations welcomes manuscripts that seek to cross disciplinary boundaries in order to develop new perspectives and insights into social relationships and relationships between people and organizations. Human Relations encourages strong empirical contributions that develop and extend theory as well as more conceptual papers that integrate, critique and expand existing theory. Human Relations welcomes critical reviews and essays: - Critical reviews advance a field through new theory, new methods, a novel synthesis of extant evidence, or a combination of two or three of these elements. Reviews that identify new research questions and that make links between management and organizations and the wider social sciences are particularly welcome. Surveys or overviews of a field are unlikely to meet these criteria. - Critical essays address contemporary scholarly issues and debates within the journal''s scope. They are more controversial than conventional papers or reviews, and can be shorter. They argue a point of view, but must meet standards of academic rigour. Anyone with an idea for a critical essay is particularly encouraged to discuss it at an early stage with the Editor-in-Chief. Human Relations encourages research that relates social theory to social practice and translates knowledge about human relations into prospects for social action and policy-making that aims to improve working lives.