Elias C. Rodrigues , Roney L. Thompson , Dário A.B. Oliveira , Roberto F. Ausas
{"title":"利用通用微分方程和可微物理寻找粘弹性本构方程","authors":"Elias C. Rodrigues , Roney L. Thompson , Dário A.B. Oliveira , Roberto F. Ausas","doi":"10.1016/j.engappai.2025.111788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Determining the appropriate constitutive model to describe the behavior of a given material is a fundamental, yet challenging, aspect of rheology. While data-driven methods present a promising path for refining these models, a more in-depth investigation into the capabilities and limitations of emerging techniques is required. This research addresses this gap by employing Universal Differential Equations (UDEs) and differentiable physics to model viscoelastic fluids, merging conventional differential equations with neural networks to reconstruct missing terms in constitutive models. This study focuses on analyzing four viscoelastic models, Upper Convected Maxwell (UCM), Johnson–Segalman, Giesekus, and Exponential Phan–Thien–Tanner (ePTT) using synthetic datasets. The methodology was tested across different experimental conditions, including oscillatory and startup flows. Relative error analyses revealed that the UDEs framework maintains low and stable errors (below 0.3%) for the UCM, Johnson–Segalman, and Giesekus models under various conditions, while exhibiting higher but consistent errors (4%) for the ePTT model due to its strong nonlinearity. These findings highlight the potential of UDEs in fluid mechanics while also identifying critical areas for methodological improvement. Additionally, a model distillation approach was employed to extract simplified models from complex ones, emphasizing the versatility and robustness of UDEs in rheological modeling.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50523,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence","volume":"160 ","pages":"Article 111788"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finding the underlying viscoelastic constitutive equation via universal differential equations and differentiable physics\",\"authors\":\"Elias C. Rodrigues , Roney L. Thompson , Dário A.B. Oliveira , Roberto F. Ausas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.engappai.2025.111788\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Determining the appropriate constitutive model to describe the behavior of a given material is a fundamental, yet challenging, aspect of rheology. While data-driven methods present a promising path for refining these models, a more in-depth investigation into the capabilities and limitations of emerging techniques is required. This research addresses this gap by employing Universal Differential Equations (UDEs) and differentiable physics to model viscoelastic fluids, merging conventional differential equations with neural networks to reconstruct missing terms in constitutive models. This study focuses on analyzing four viscoelastic models, Upper Convected Maxwell (UCM), Johnson–Segalman, Giesekus, and Exponential Phan–Thien–Tanner (ePTT) using synthetic datasets. The methodology was tested across different experimental conditions, including oscillatory and startup flows. Relative error analyses revealed that the UDEs framework maintains low and stable errors (below 0.3%) for the UCM, Johnson–Segalman, and Giesekus models under various conditions, while exhibiting higher but consistent errors (4%) for the ePTT model due to its strong nonlinearity. These findings highlight the potential of UDEs in fluid mechanics while also identifying critical areas for methodological improvement. Additionally, a model distillation approach was employed to extract simplified models from complex ones, emphasizing the versatility and robustness of UDEs in rheological modeling.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"160 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111788\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952197625017907\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952197625017907","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Finding the underlying viscoelastic constitutive equation via universal differential equations and differentiable physics
Determining the appropriate constitutive model to describe the behavior of a given material is a fundamental, yet challenging, aspect of rheology. While data-driven methods present a promising path for refining these models, a more in-depth investigation into the capabilities and limitations of emerging techniques is required. This research addresses this gap by employing Universal Differential Equations (UDEs) and differentiable physics to model viscoelastic fluids, merging conventional differential equations with neural networks to reconstruct missing terms in constitutive models. This study focuses on analyzing four viscoelastic models, Upper Convected Maxwell (UCM), Johnson–Segalman, Giesekus, and Exponential Phan–Thien–Tanner (ePTT) using synthetic datasets. The methodology was tested across different experimental conditions, including oscillatory and startup flows. Relative error analyses revealed that the UDEs framework maintains low and stable errors (below 0.3%) for the UCM, Johnson–Segalman, and Giesekus models under various conditions, while exhibiting higher but consistent errors (4%) for the ePTT model due to its strong nonlinearity. These findings highlight the potential of UDEs in fluid mechanics while also identifying critical areas for methodological improvement. Additionally, a model distillation approach was employed to extract simplified models from complex ones, emphasizing the versatility and robustness of UDEs in rheological modeling.
期刊介绍:
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is pivotal in driving the fourth industrial revolution, witnessing remarkable advancements across various machine learning methodologies. AI techniques have become indispensable tools for practicing engineers, enabling them to tackle previously insurmountable challenges. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence serves as a global platform for the swift dissemination of research elucidating the practical application of AI methods across all engineering disciplines. Submitted papers are expected to present novel aspects of AI utilized in real-world engineering applications, validated using publicly available datasets to ensure the replicability of research outcomes. Join us in exploring the transformative potential of AI in engineering.