在欧洲儿科软组织肉瘤研究组(EpSSG) RMS2005研究中,膀胱和/或前列腺横纹肌肉瘤的局部治疗无淋巴结或转移性扩散

Naima Smeulders , Florent Guerin , Mark N. Gaze , Timothy Rogers , Sheila Terwisscha van Scheltinga , Federica De Corti , Julia Chisholm , Olga Slater , Veronique Minard-Colin , Beatrice Coppadoro , Ilaria Zanetti , Ross Craigie , Gabriela Guillen Burrieza , Patrizia Dall'Igna , Raquel Davila Fajardo , Pei S. Lim , Cyrus Chargari , Sophie Espenel , Ana L. Luis Huertas , Alexander Cho , Helene Martelli
{"title":"在欧洲儿科软组织肉瘤研究组(EpSSG) RMS2005研究中,膀胱和/或前列腺横纹肌肉瘤的局部治疗无淋巴结或转移性扩散","authors":"Naima Smeulders ,&nbsp;Florent Guerin ,&nbsp;Mark N. Gaze ,&nbsp;Timothy Rogers ,&nbsp;Sheila Terwisscha van Scheltinga ,&nbsp;Federica De Corti ,&nbsp;Julia Chisholm ,&nbsp;Olga Slater ,&nbsp;Veronique Minard-Colin ,&nbsp;Beatrice Coppadoro ,&nbsp;Ilaria Zanetti ,&nbsp;Ross Craigie ,&nbsp;Gabriela Guillen Burrieza ,&nbsp;Patrizia Dall'Igna ,&nbsp;Raquel Davila Fajardo ,&nbsp;Pei S. Lim ,&nbsp;Cyrus Chargari ,&nbsp;Sophie Espenel ,&nbsp;Ana L. Luis Huertas ,&nbsp;Alexander Cho ,&nbsp;Helene Martelli","doi":"10.1016/j.ejcped.2025.100313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>During the EpSSG RMS2005 trial, organ-sparing surgery (OSS) with brachytherapy (BT) became the local therapy (LT) of choice for selected patients with bladder-prostate rhabdomyosarcoma (BP-RMS). We compare this LT technique with surgical resection and/or external-beam radiotherapy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with BP-RMS without nodal or metastatic spread enrolled in RMS2005 were categorized by their LT, differentiating OSS from organ-depleting surgery (ODS) and BT from external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Progressive disease, relapse or death were considered events for progression-free survival (PFS) and all deaths for overall survival (OS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The cohort comprised 176 patients, aged 10days-21.8years (median 2.5years). Median follow-up was 6.5years (22months-12.5years): 5year-PFS was 80.3 % (95 %CI:73.6–85.5 %); 5year-OS was 90.7 % (95 %CI:85.3–94.2 %).</div><div>Patients selected for surgery alone or BT with/without OSS (BT+/-OSS) differed significantly in age, tumour size and location from those offered EBRT alone or any other surgery and radiotherapy. Nevertheless, 5year-PFS was similar for the LT groups. However, 5year-OS differed significantly, being highest in patients suitable for surgery alone (100 %; by ODS in 55 %) or BT+ /-OSS (98.1 %; 95 %CI:87.4–99.7 %). Patients with local tumour progression/relapse after EBRT failed salvage: 5year-OS was 81.8 % (95 %CI:58.5–92.8 %) for EBRT alone and 85.3 % (95 %CI:71.6–92.7 %) for surgery and radiotherapy.</div><div>Postponing LT until after chemotherapy cycle 7 did not significantly impact 5year-PFS or OS.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The risk of events was similar for different LT modalities; poor salvage after EBRT significantly reduced 5year-OS. Although not feasible for all, BT+ /-OSS offers an excellent prospect of cure, the best chance of organ retention while avoiding EBRT, and may be delayed for chemotherapy responsive tumours.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94314,"journal":{"name":"EJC paediatric oncology","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100313"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Local therapy for rhabdomyosarcoma of the bladder and/or prostate without nodal or metastatic spread during the European paediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG) RMS2005 study\",\"authors\":\"Naima Smeulders ,&nbsp;Florent Guerin ,&nbsp;Mark N. Gaze ,&nbsp;Timothy Rogers ,&nbsp;Sheila Terwisscha van Scheltinga ,&nbsp;Federica De Corti ,&nbsp;Julia Chisholm ,&nbsp;Olga Slater ,&nbsp;Veronique Minard-Colin ,&nbsp;Beatrice Coppadoro ,&nbsp;Ilaria Zanetti ,&nbsp;Ross Craigie ,&nbsp;Gabriela Guillen Burrieza ,&nbsp;Patrizia Dall'Igna ,&nbsp;Raquel Davila Fajardo ,&nbsp;Pei S. Lim ,&nbsp;Cyrus Chargari ,&nbsp;Sophie Espenel ,&nbsp;Ana L. Luis Huertas ,&nbsp;Alexander Cho ,&nbsp;Helene Martelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejcped.2025.100313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>During the EpSSG RMS2005 trial, organ-sparing surgery (OSS) with brachytherapy (BT) became the local therapy (LT) of choice for selected patients with bladder-prostate rhabdomyosarcoma (BP-RMS). We compare this LT technique with surgical resection and/or external-beam radiotherapy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with BP-RMS without nodal or metastatic spread enrolled in RMS2005 were categorized by their LT, differentiating OSS from organ-depleting surgery (ODS) and BT from external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Progressive disease, relapse or death were considered events for progression-free survival (PFS) and all deaths for overall survival (OS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The cohort comprised 176 patients, aged 10days-21.8years (median 2.5years). Median follow-up was 6.5years (22months-12.5years): 5year-PFS was 80.3 % (95 %CI:73.6–85.5 %); 5year-OS was 90.7 % (95 %CI:85.3–94.2 %).</div><div>Patients selected for surgery alone or BT with/without OSS (BT+/-OSS) differed significantly in age, tumour size and location from those offered EBRT alone or any other surgery and radiotherapy. Nevertheless, 5year-PFS was similar for the LT groups. However, 5year-OS differed significantly, being highest in patients suitable for surgery alone (100 %; by ODS in 55 %) or BT+ /-OSS (98.1 %; 95 %CI:87.4–99.7 %). Patients with local tumour progression/relapse after EBRT failed salvage: 5year-OS was 81.8 % (95 %CI:58.5–92.8 %) for EBRT alone and 85.3 % (95 %CI:71.6–92.7 %) for surgery and radiotherapy.</div><div>Postponing LT until after chemotherapy cycle 7 did not significantly impact 5year-PFS or OS.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The risk of events was similar for different LT modalities; poor salvage after EBRT significantly reduced 5year-OS. Although not feasible for all, BT+ /-OSS offers an excellent prospect of cure, the best chance of organ retention while avoiding EBRT, and may be delayed for chemotherapy responsive tumours.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94314,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EJC paediatric oncology\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100313\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EJC paediatric oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772610X25001023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJC paediatric oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772610X25001023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在EpSSG RMS2005试验中,器官保留手术(OSS)与近距离治疗(BT)成为膀胱-前列腺横纹肌肉瘤(BP-RMS)患者的局部治疗(LT)选择。我们将这种LT技术与手术切除和/或外束放疗进行比较。方法纳入RMS2005的无淋巴结或转移性扩散BP-RMS患者根据其LT进行分类,将OSS与器官消耗手术(ODS)区分开来,将BT与外束放疗(EBRT)区分开来。疾病进展、复发或死亡被认为是无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)的所有死亡事件。结果该队列包括176例患者,年龄10天-21.8岁(中位2.5岁)。中位随访时间为6.5年(22个月-12.5年):5年pfs为80.3 %(95 %CI: 73.6-85.5 %);5年os为90.7 %(95 %CI: 85.3-94.2 %)。选择单独手术或BT合并/不合并OSS (BT+/-OSS)的患者与单独接受EBRT或任何其他手术和放疗的患者在年龄、肿瘤大小和位置上有显著差异。然而,LT组的5年pfs相似。然而,5年os差异显著,适合单独手术的患者最高(100% %;通过ODS(55% %)或BT+ /-OSS(98.1% %;95 %置信区间:87.4—-99.7 %)。EBRT挽救失败后局部肿瘤进展/复发的患者:单独EBRT的5年os为81.8 %(95 %CI: 58.5-92.8 %),手术和放疗的5年os为85.3 %(95 %CI: 71.6-92.7 %)。将LT推迟到化疗周期7之后,对5年pfs或OS没有显著影响。结论:不同肝移植方式的事件风险相似;EBRT后抢救不良显著降低了5年生存率。虽然并非对所有人都可行,但BT+ /-OSS提供了极好的治疗前景,在避免EBRT的同时保留器官的最佳机会,并且可能延迟化疗反应性肿瘤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Local therapy for rhabdomyosarcoma of the bladder and/or prostate without nodal or metastatic spread during the European paediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG) RMS2005 study

Background

During the EpSSG RMS2005 trial, organ-sparing surgery (OSS) with brachytherapy (BT) became the local therapy (LT) of choice for selected patients with bladder-prostate rhabdomyosarcoma (BP-RMS). We compare this LT technique with surgical resection and/or external-beam radiotherapy.

Methods

Patients with BP-RMS without nodal or metastatic spread enrolled in RMS2005 were categorized by their LT, differentiating OSS from organ-depleting surgery (ODS) and BT from external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Progressive disease, relapse or death were considered events for progression-free survival (PFS) and all deaths for overall survival (OS).

Results

The cohort comprised 176 patients, aged 10days-21.8years (median 2.5years). Median follow-up was 6.5years (22months-12.5years): 5year-PFS was 80.3 % (95 %CI:73.6–85.5 %); 5year-OS was 90.7 % (95 %CI:85.3–94.2 %).
Patients selected for surgery alone or BT with/without OSS (BT+/-OSS) differed significantly in age, tumour size and location from those offered EBRT alone or any other surgery and radiotherapy. Nevertheless, 5year-PFS was similar for the LT groups. However, 5year-OS differed significantly, being highest in patients suitable for surgery alone (100 %; by ODS in 55 %) or BT+ /-OSS (98.1 %; 95 %CI:87.4–99.7 %). Patients with local tumour progression/relapse after EBRT failed salvage: 5year-OS was 81.8 % (95 %CI:58.5–92.8 %) for EBRT alone and 85.3 % (95 %CI:71.6–92.7 %) for surgery and radiotherapy.
Postponing LT until after chemotherapy cycle 7 did not significantly impact 5year-PFS or OS.

Conclusions

The risk of events was similar for different LT modalities; poor salvage after EBRT significantly reduced 5year-OS. Although not feasible for all, BT+ /-OSS offers an excellent prospect of cure, the best chance of organ retention while avoiding EBRT, and may be delayed for chemotherapy responsive tumours.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信