辅助卡吡嗪处方限制对重度抑郁症的影响。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Nadia Nabulsi, François Laliberté, Enrico Zanardo, Sean D MacKnight, Sophie Ma, Sally W Wade, Mousam Parikh
{"title":"辅助卡吡嗪处方限制对重度抑郁症的影响。","authors":"Nadia Nabulsi, François Laliberté, Enrico Zanardo, Sean D MacKnight, Sophie Ma, Sally W Wade, Mousam Parikh","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2025.89770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effects of formulary-related rejections of initial adjunctive cariprazine (Vraylar) claims on health care resource utilization (HCRU) among patients with major depressive disorder (MDD).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective claims-based analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from Symphony Health Integrated Dataverse from March 2015 through October 2020, we identified adults with MDD who were being treated with antidepressants and had an initial cariprazine claim that was either rejected for a formulary-related reason (eg, noncoverage, prior authorization requirement, step therapy requirement) or approved; rejected patients were required to receive a subsequent atypical antipsychotic (which helps balance the health status across cohorts but may induce bias and affect generalizability). Rejected and approved cohorts were matched (1:2) using propensity scores. Outcomes included all-cause and mental health (MH)-related HCRU (hospitalizations, emergency department [ED] visits, outpatient visits) and treatment patterns. HCRU was compared between cohorts using rate ratios (RRs), with 95% CIs and P values. Treatment patterns were analyzed using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rejected cohort comprised 566 patients, with 1132 matched patients in the approved cohort. All-cause and MH-related hospitalization rates were 61% and 89% higher, respectively, for the rejected vs approved cohort (all-cause: RR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.15-2.32; P = .012; MH related: RR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.18-2.89; P = .016). ED and outpatient visit rates were similar. Patients in the rejected cohort often never received cariprazine (68.4%), and those who did received it after a 6-month delay on average.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with MDD who had an initial adjunctive cariprazine claim rejected for a formulary-related reason and subsequently received an atypical antipsychotic experienced significantly higher hospitalization rates than those with approved initial cariprazine claims, suggesting that formulary restrictions on adjunctive cariprazine may be associated with negative downstream effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":"31 7","pages":"e191-e200"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of adjunctive cariprazine formulary restrictions in major depressive disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Nadia Nabulsi, François Laliberté, Enrico Zanardo, Sean D MacKnight, Sophie Ma, Sally W Wade, Mousam Parikh\",\"doi\":\"10.37765/ajmc.2025.89770\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effects of formulary-related rejections of initial adjunctive cariprazine (Vraylar) claims on health care resource utilization (HCRU) among patients with major depressive disorder (MDD).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective claims-based analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from Symphony Health Integrated Dataverse from March 2015 through October 2020, we identified adults with MDD who were being treated with antidepressants and had an initial cariprazine claim that was either rejected for a formulary-related reason (eg, noncoverage, prior authorization requirement, step therapy requirement) or approved; rejected patients were required to receive a subsequent atypical antipsychotic (which helps balance the health status across cohorts but may induce bias and affect generalizability). Rejected and approved cohorts were matched (1:2) using propensity scores. Outcomes included all-cause and mental health (MH)-related HCRU (hospitalizations, emergency department [ED] visits, outpatient visits) and treatment patterns. HCRU was compared between cohorts using rate ratios (RRs), with 95% CIs and P values. Treatment patterns were analyzed using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rejected cohort comprised 566 patients, with 1132 matched patients in the approved cohort. All-cause and MH-related hospitalization rates were 61% and 89% higher, respectively, for the rejected vs approved cohort (all-cause: RR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.15-2.32; P = .012; MH related: RR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.18-2.89; P = .016). ED and outpatient visit rates were similar. Patients in the rejected cohort often never received cariprazine (68.4%), and those who did received it after a 6-month delay on average.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with MDD who had an initial adjunctive cariprazine claim rejected for a formulary-related reason and subsequently received an atypical antipsychotic experienced significantly higher hospitalization rates than those with approved initial cariprazine claims, suggesting that formulary restrictions on adjunctive cariprazine may be associated with negative downstream effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Managed Care\",\"volume\":\"31 7\",\"pages\":\"e191-e200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Managed Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2025.89770\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2025.89770","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨重度抑郁障碍(MDD)患者初始辅助卡吡嗪(Vraylar)处方相关排斥对医疗资源利用(HCRU)的影响。研究设计:回顾性索赔分析。方法:使用2015年3月至2020年10月来自Symphony Health Integrated Dataverse的数据,我们确定了正在接受抗抑郁药物治疗的成年MDD患者,他们最初的卡吡嗪申请要么因处方相关原因(例如,未覆盖、事先授权要求、分步治疗要求)被拒绝,要么被批准;被拒绝的患者被要求接受随后的非典型抗精神病药(这有助于平衡各组的健康状况,但可能导致偏见并影响普遍性)。拒绝和批准的队列使用倾向评分进行匹配(1:2)。结果包括全因和精神健康(MH)相关的HCRU(住院、急诊科[ED]就诊、门诊就诊)和治疗模式。使用比率比(rr)比较各组间的HCRU, ci和P值均为95%。采用描述性统计分析治疗模式。结果:拒绝队列包括566例患者,批准队列中有1132例匹配患者。拒绝队列与批准队列的全因住院率和mh相关住院率分别高出61%和89%(全因:RR, 1.61;95% ci, 1.15-2.32;P = 0.012;MH相关:RR, 1.89;95% ci, 1.18-2.89;P = .016)。急诊科和门诊就诊率相似。在被拒绝的队列中,患者通常从未接受卡吡嗪治疗(68.4%),而接受治疗的患者平均延迟6个月。结论:最初因处方相关原因申请辅助卡吡嗪被拒绝并随后接受非典型抗精神病药物治疗的重度抑郁症患者的住院率明显高于最初申请卡吡嗪获批的患者,这表明处方限制辅助卡吡嗪可能与负面的下游效应有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of adjunctive cariprazine formulary restrictions in major depressive disorder.

Objectives: To evaluate the effects of formulary-related rejections of initial adjunctive cariprazine (Vraylar) claims on health care resource utilization (HCRU) among patients with major depressive disorder (MDD).

Study design: Retrospective claims-based analysis.

Methods: Using data from Symphony Health Integrated Dataverse from March 2015 through October 2020, we identified adults with MDD who were being treated with antidepressants and had an initial cariprazine claim that was either rejected for a formulary-related reason (eg, noncoverage, prior authorization requirement, step therapy requirement) or approved; rejected patients were required to receive a subsequent atypical antipsychotic (which helps balance the health status across cohorts but may induce bias and affect generalizability). Rejected and approved cohorts were matched (1:2) using propensity scores. Outcomes included all-cause and mental health (MH)-related HCRU (hospitalizations, emergency department [ED] visits, outpatient visits) and treatment patterns. HCRU was compared between cohorts using rate ratios (RRs), with 95% CIs and P values. Treatment patterns were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results: The rejected cohort comprised 566 patients, with 1132 matched patients in the approved cohort. All-cause and MH-related hospitalization rates were 61% and 89% higher, respectively, for the rejected vs approved cohort (all-cause: RR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.15-2.32; P = .012; MH related: RR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.18-2.89; P = .016). ED and outpatient visit rates were similar. Patients in the rejected cohort often never received cariprazine (68.4%), and those who did received it after a 6-month delay on average.

Conclusions: Patients with MDD who had an initial adjunctive cariprazine claim rejected for a formulary-related reason and subsequently received an atypical antipsychotic experienced significantly higher hospitalization rates than those with approved initial cariprazine claims, suggesting that formulary restrictions on adjunctive cariprazine may be associated with negative downstream effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Managed Care
American Journal of Managed Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信