英夫利昔单抗的皮质类固醇预用药仍然是不必要的常见。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Shirley Cohen-Mekelburg, Jeffrey Gibbs, Beth Wallace, Brooke Kenney, Akbar K Waljee
{"title":"英夫利昔单抗的皮质类固醇预用药仍然是不必要的常见。","authors":"Shirley Cohen-Mekelburg, Jeffrey Gibbs, Beth Wallace, Brooke Kenney, Akbar K Waljee","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2025.89765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Corticosteroid use can lead to serious adverse events even with short-term use. Data suggest that corticosteroid premedication prior to infliximab (IFX) administration is ineffective at preventing infusion reactions. Therefore, we examined corticosteroid premedication practices in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which represent an opportunity for reducing corticosteroid overuse.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>National cohort study of patients with IBD receiving IFX using 2015-2021 Truven (now Merative) MarketScan data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined corticosteroid premedication as an outcome of interest using descriptive statistics and identified associated patient-level factors using bivariate analyses. We also explored differences in corticosteroid premedication for first IFX infusions (ie, no opportunity for a prior reaction) and subsequent IFX infusions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 19,637 patients with IBD who received IFX and met the inclusion criteria. Corticosteroid premedication use declined from 27.4% in 2015 to 20.4% in 2020. During this time, 38.7% of the 4639 patients who received IFX premedication were premedicated for more than 90% of their infusions. Overall, those who received corticosteroid premedication were younger (median age, 30 vs 33 years), more often female (51.6% vs 47.7%), and more likely to have 1 or more comorbidities (21.7% vs 18.8%) than patients who were not premedicated, but the groups had similar rates of diabetes (4.1% vs 4.2%), cataracts (1.4% vs 1.3%), and osteoporosis (1.4% for both). Among patients receiving corticosteroid premedication, 62.5% received it with their first IFX infusion, suggesting routine practice rather than a strategy for those who had a prior infusion reaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Corticosteroid premedication for IFX remains unnecessarily common. Corticosteroid premedicating is a common low-value practice that could be targeted to reduce corticosteroid overuse in IBD.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":"31 7","pages":"323-327"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corticosteroid premedication for infliximab remains unnecessarily common.\",\"authors\":\"Shirley Cohen-Mekelburg, Jeffrey Gibbs, Beth Wallace, Brooke Kenney, Akbar K Waljee\",\"doi\":\"10.37765/ajmc.2025.89765\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Corticosteroid use can lead to serious adverse events even with short-term use. Data suggest that corticosteroid premedication prior to infliximab (IFX) administration is ineffective at preventing infusion reactions. Therefore, we examined corticosteroid premedication practices in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which represent an opportunity for reducing corticosteroid overuse.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>National cohort study of patients with IBD receiving IFX using 2015-2021 Truven (now Merative) MarketScan data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined corticosteroid premedication as an outcome of interest using descriptive statistics and identified associated patient-level factors using bivariate analyses. We also explored differences in corticosteroid premedication for first IFX infusions (ie, no opportunity for a prior reaction) and subsequent IFX infusions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 19,637 patients with IBD who received IFX and met the inclusion criteria. Corticosteroid premedication use declined from 27.4% in 2015 to 20.4% in 2020. During this time, 38.7% of the 4639 patients who received IFX premedication were premedicated for more than 90% of their infusions. Overall, those who received corticosteroid premedication were younger (median age, 30 vs 33 years), more often female (51.6% vs 47.7%), and more likely to have 1 or more comorbidities (21.7% vs 18.8%) than patients who were not premedicated, but the groups had similar rates of diabetes (4.1% vs 4.2%), cataracts (1.4% vs 1.3%), and osteoporosis (1.4% for both). Among patients receiving corticosteroid premedication, 62.5% received it with their first IFX infusion, suggesting routine practice rather than a strategy for those who had a prior infusion reaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Corticosteroid premedication for IFX remains unnecessarily common. Corticosteroid premedicating is a common low-value practice that could be targeted to reduce corticosteroid overuse in IBD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Managed Care\",\"volume\":\"31 7\",\"pages\":\"323-327\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Managed Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2025.89765\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2025.89765","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:皮质类固醇的使用即使短期使用也会导致严重的不良事件。数据表明,在英夫利昔单抗(IFX)给药前使用皮质类固醇对预防输液反应无效。因此,我们检查了炎症性肠病(IBD)的皮质类固醇药物前实践,这代表了减少皮质类固醇过度使用的机会。研究设计:使用2015-2021年Truven(现为Merative) MarketScan数据对接受IFX治疗的IBD患者进行全国性队列研究。方法:我们使用描述性统计检查皮质类固醇药物前治疗作为感兴趣的结果,并使用双变量分析确定相关的患者水平因素。我们还探讨了首次IFX输注(即没有发生既往反应的机会)和随后IFX输注皮质类固醇预用药的差异。结果:我们确定了19637例接受IFX治疗并符合纳入标准的IBD患者。皮质类固醇药物前使用率从2015年的27.4%下降到2020年的20.4%。在此期间,接受IFX预用药的4639名患者中,有38.7%的患者在90%以上的输注中进行了预用药。总体而言,接受皮质类固醇预用药的患者比未接受预用药的患者更年轻(中位年龄,30岁对33岁),更常见的是女性(51.6%对47.7%),更可能有一种或多种合并症(21.7%对18.8%),但两组糖尿病(4.1%对4.2%)、白内障(1.4%对1.3%)和骨质疏松症(两者均为1.4%)的发生率相似。在接受皮质类固醇药物前治疗的患者中,62.5%的患者在首次IFX输注时接受了皮质类固醇,这表明对于那些先前输注有反应的患者来说,这是常规做法,而不是策略。结论:皮质类固醇预用药对于IFX仍然是不必要的普遍。皮质类固醇预用药是一种常见的低价值做法,可以有针对性地减少IBD中皮质类固醇的过度使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Corticosteroid premedication for infliximab remains unnecessarily common.

Objectives: Corticosteroid use can lead to serious adverse events even with short-term use. Data suggest that corticosteroid premedication prior to infliximab (IFX) administration is ineffective at preventing infusion reactions. Therefore, we examined corticosteroid premedication practices in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which represent an opportunity for reducing corticosteroid overuse.

Study design: National cohort study of patients with IBD receiving IFX using 2015-2021 Truven (now Merative) MarketScan data.

Methods: We examined corticosteroid premedication as an outcome of interest using descriptive statistics and identified associated patient-level factors using bivariate analyses. We also explored differences in corticosteroid premedication for first IFX infusions (ie, no opportunity for a prior reaction) and subsequent IFX infusions.

Results: We identified 19,637 patients with IBD who received IFX and met the inclusion criteria. Corticosteroid premedication use declined from 27.4% in 2015 to 20.4% in 2020. During this time, 38.7% of the 4639 patients who received IFX premedication were premedicated for more than 90% of their infusions. Overall, those who received corticosteroid premedication were younger (median age, 30 vs 33 years), more often female (51.6% vs 47.7%), and more likely to have 1 or more comorbidities (21.7% vs 18.8%) than patients who were not premedicated, but the groups had similar rates of diabetes (4.1% vs 4.2%), cataracts (1.4% vs 1.3%), and osteoporosis (1.4% for both). Among patients receiving corticosteroid premedication, 62.5% received it with their first IFX infusion, suggesting routine practice rather than a strategy for those who had a prior infusion reaction.

Conclusions: Corticosteroid premedication for IFX remains unnecessarily common. Corticosteroid premedicating is a common low-value practice that could be targeted to reduce corticosteroid overuse in IBD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Managed Care
American Journal of Managed Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信