Danielle K Manning, Guruprasad Ananda, Cheryl Eifert, Vanesa Rojas-Rudilla, William Swanton, Shawn Keefe, Elizabeth P Garcia, Michael D'Eletto, Erica Holdmore, Satyakam Mishra, Kirill Borziak, Pieter Lukasse, Phani Davineni, Monica Devi Manam, Priyanka Shivdasani, Arezou A Ghazani, Ai Ling Wang, Murat Bastepe, Himisha Beltran, Katherine A Janeway, Alanna Church, Alicia Pollaci, Anuradha B Chittenden, Diane R Koeller, Alison Schwartz Levine, Judy E Garber, Bruce E Johnson, Neal I Lindeman, Jonathan A Nowak, Lynette M Sholl, Laura E MacConaill
{"title":"匹配肿瘤/生殖系测序的临床实施提高了肿瘤基因组分析的准确性和治疗建议。","authors":"Danielle K Manning, Guruprasad Ananda, Cheryl Eifert, Vanesa Rojas-Rudilla, William Swanton, Shawn Keefe, Elizabeth P Garcia, Michael D'Eletto, Erica Holdmore, Satyakam Mishra, Kirill Borziak, Pieter Lukasse, Phani Davineni, Monica Devi Manam, Priyanka Shivdasani, Arezou A Ghazani, Ai Ling Wang, Murat Bastepe, Himisha Beltran, Katherine A Janeway, Alanna Church, Alicia Pollaci, Anuradha B Chittenden, Diane R Koeller, Alison Schwartz Levine, Judy E Garber, Bruce E Johnson, Neal I Lindeman, Jonathan A Nowak, Lynette M Sholl, Laura E MacConaill","doi":"10.1016/j.jmoldx.2025.06.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Genomic profiling of cancers informs diagnostic and prognostic classification and aids in selection of targeted therapeutics. Targeted, next-generation sequencing of cancer-specific genes is clinically feasible and enables comprehensive somatic reporting; without a matched germline specimen, germline alterations can confound analyses of the somatic profile and create uncertainty in interpretation. We report the validation and implementation of optional matched tumor/germline sequencing in our precision cancer medicine program. Sixty-three cases were selected for technical validation. DNA was analyzed using OncoPanel, a hybrid capture-based sequencing assay of 461 cancer genes. Three analytical pipelines were implemented: tumor-only, matched tumor/germline, and germline-only. For matched tumor/germline, we \"rescued\" germline alterations in 19 genes with actionable/therapeutic implications. We retrospectively analyzed the first 1600 matched cases to determine the potential clinical utility of this approach. Limit of detection for point mutations/indels was 3% allele fraction; reproducibility was >98%. Matched tumor/germline concordance across 938 somatic calls was 100%. The average TMB was ∼4 mutations/Mb lower than tumor-only sequencing. TMB-high patients were accurately reclassified as TMB-low in 14% of cases. 25% of validation cases (14% post-launch) had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variant conferring cancer susceptibility; 14% of validation cases (7% post-launch) harbored a germline variant of therapeutic significance. Matched tumor/germline sequencing is more accurate than tumor-only sequencing, while still encompassing all genomic findings that inform targeted therapy selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":50128,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Implementation of Matched Tumor/Germline Sequencing Improves Accuracy of Tumor Genomic Profiling and Therapeutic Recommendations.\",\"authors\":\"Danielle K Manning, Guruprasad Ananda, Cheryl Eifert, Vanesa Rojas-Rudilla, William Swanton, Shawn Keefe, Elizabeth P Garcia, Michael D'Eletto, Erica Holdmore, Satyakam Mishra, Kirill Borziak, Pieter Lukasse, Phani Davineni, Monica Devi Manam, Priyanka Shivdasani, Arezou A Ghazani, Ai Ling Wang, Murat Bastepe, Himisha Beltran, Katherine A Janeway, Alanna Church, Alicia Pollaci, Anuradha B Chittenden, Diane R Koeller, Alison Schwartz Levine, Judy E Garber, Bruce E Johnson, Neal I Lindeman, Jonathan A Nowak, Lynette M Sholl, Laura E MacConaill\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmoldx.2025.06.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Genomic profiling of cancers informs diagnostic and prognostic classification and aids in selection of targeted therapeutics. Targeted, next-generation sequencing of cancer-specific genes is clinically feasible and enables comprehensive somatic reporting; without a matched germline specimen, germline alterations can confound analyses of the somatic profile and create uncertainty in interpretation. We report the validation and implementation of optional matched tumor/germline sequencing in our precision cancer medicine program. Sixty-three cases were selected for technical validation. DNA was analyzed using OncoPanel, a hybrid capture-based sequencing assay of 461 cancer genes. Three analytical pipelines were implemented: tumor-only, matched tumor/germline, and germline-only. For matched tumor/germline, we \\\"rescued\\\" germline alterations in 19 genes with actionable/therapeutic implications. We retrospectively analyzed the first 1600 matched cases to determine the potential clinical utility of this approach. Limit of detection for point mutations/indels was 3% allele fraction; reproducibility was >98%. Matched tumor/germline concordance across 938 somatic calls was 100%. The average TMB was ∼4 mutations/Mb lower than tumor-only sequencing. TMB-high patients were accurately reclassified as TMB-low in 14% of cases. 25% of validation cases (14% post-launch) had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variant conferring cancer susceptibility; 14% of validation cases (7% post-launch) harbored a germline variant of therapeutic significance. Matched tumor/germline sequencing is more accurate than tumor-only sequencing, while still encompassing all genomic findings that inform targeted therapy selection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2025.06.005\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2025.06.005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical Implementation of Matched Tumor/Germline Sequencing Improves Accuracy of Tumor Genomic Profiling and Therapeutic Recommendations.
Genomic profiling of cancers informs diagnostic and prognostic classification and aids in selection of targeted therapeutics. Targeted, next-generation sequencing of cancer-specific genes is clinically feasible and enables comprehensive somatic reporting; without a matched germline specimen, germline alterations can confound analyses of the somatic profile and create uncertainty in interpretation. We report the validation and implementation of optional matched tumor/germline sequencing in our precision cancer medicine program. Sixty-three cases were selected for technical validation. DNA was analyzed using OncoPanel, a hybrid capture-based sequencing assay of 461 cancer genes. Three analytical pipelines were implemented: tumor-only, matched tumor/germline, and germline-only. For matched tumor/germline, we "rescued" germline alterations in 19 genes with actionable/therapeutic implications. We retrospectively analyzed the first 1600 matched cases to determine the potential clinical utility of this approach. Limit of detection for point mutations/indels was 3% allele fraction; reproducibility was >98%. Matched tumor/germline concordance across 938 somatic calls was 100%. The average TMB was ∼4 mutations/Mb lower than tumor-only sequencing. TMB-high patients were accurately reclassified as TMB-low in 14% of cases. 25% of validation cases (14% post-launch) had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variant conferring cancer susceptibility; 14% of validation cases (7% post-launch) harbored a germline variant of therapeutic significance. Matched tumor/germline sequencing is more accurate than tumor-only sequencing, while still encompassing all genomic findings that inform targeted therapy selection.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, the official publication of the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP), co-owned by the American Society for Investigative Pathology (ASIP), seeks to publish high quality original papers on scientific advances in the translation and validation of molecular discoveries in medicine into the clinical diagnostic setting, and the description and application of technological advances in the field of molecular diagnostic medicine. The editors welcome for review articles that contain: novel discoveries or clinicopathologic correlations including studies in oncology, infectious diseases, inherited diseases, predisposition to disease, clinical informatics, or the description of polymorphisms linked to disease states or normal variations; the application of diagnostic methodologies in clinical trials; or the development of new or improved molecular methods which may be applied to diagnosis or monitoring of disease or disease predisposition.