匹配肿瘤/生殖系测序的临床实施提高了肿瘤基因组分析的准确性和治疗建议。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Danielle K Manning, Guruprasad Ananda, Cheryl Eifert, Vanesa Rojas-Rudilla, William Swanton, Shawn Keefe, Elizabeth P Garcia, Michael D'Eletto, Erica Holdmore, Satyakam Mishra, Kirill Borziak, Pieter Lukasse, Phani Davineni, Monica Devi Manam, Priyanka Shivdasani, Arezou A Ghazani, Ai Ling Wang, Murat Bastepe, Himisha Beltran, Katherine A Janeway, Alanna Church, Alicia Pollaci, Anuradha B Chittenden, Diane R Koeller, Alison Schwartz Levine, Judy E Garber, Bruce E Johnson, Neal I Lindeman, Jonathan A Nowak, Lynette M Sholl, Laura E MacConaill
{"title":"匹配肿瘤/生殖系测序的临床实施提高了肿瘤基因组分析的准确性和治疗建议。","authors":"Danielle K Manning, Guruprasad Ananda, Cheryl Eifert, Vanesa Rojas-Rudilla, William Swanton, Shawn Keefe, Elizabeth P Garcia, Michael D'Eletto, Erica Holdmore, Satyakam Mishra, Kirill Borziak, Pieter Lukasse, Phani Davineni, Monica Devi Manam, Priyanka Shivdasani, Arezou A Ghazani, Ai Ling Wang, Murat Bastepe, Himisha Beltran, Katherine A Janeway, Alanna Church, Alicia Pollaci, Anuradha B Chittenden, Diane R Koeller, Alison Schwartz Levine, Judy E Garber, Bruce E Johnson, Neal I Lindeman, Jonathan A Nowak, Lynette M Sholl, Laura E MacConaill","doi":"10.1016/j.jmoldx.2025.06.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Genomic profiling of cancers informs diagnostic and prognostic classification and aids in selection of targeted therapeutics. Targeted, next-generation sequencing of cancer-specific genes is clinically feasible and enables comprehensive somatic reporting; without a matched germline specimen, germline alterations can confound analyses of the somatic profile and create uncertainty in interpretation. We report the validation and implementation of optional matched tumor/germline sequencing in our precision cancer medicine program. Sixty-three cases were selected for technical validation. DNA was analyzed using OncoPanel, a hybrid capture-based sequencing assay of 461 cancer genes. Three analytical pipelines were implemented: tumor-only, matched tumor/germline, and germline-only. For matched tumor/germline, we \"rescued\" germline alterations in 19 genes with actionable/therapeutic implications. We retrospectively analyzed the first 1600 matched cases to determine the potential clinical utility of this approach. Limit of detection for point mutations/indels was 3% allele fraction; reproducibility was >98%. Matched tumor/germline concordance across 938 somatic calls was 100%. The average TMB was ∼4 mutations/Mb lower than tumor-only sequencing. TMB-high patients were accurately reclassified as TMB-low in 14% of cases. 25% of validation cases (14% post-launch) had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variant conferring cancer susceptibility; 14% of validation cases (7% post-launch) harbored a germline variant of therapeutic significance. Matched tumor/germline sequencing is more accurate than tumor-only sequencing, while still encompassing all genomic findings that inform targeted therapy selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":50128,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Implementation of Matched Tumor/Germline Sequencing Improves Accuracy of Tumor Genomic Profiling and Therapeutic Recommendations.\",\"authors\":\"Danielle K Manning, Guruprasad Ananda, Cheryl Eifert, Vanesa Rojas-Rudilla, William Swanton, Shawn Keefe, Elizabeth P Garcia, Michael D'Eletto, Erica Holdmore, Satyakam Mishra, Kirill Borziak, Pieter Lukasse, Phani Davineni, Monica Devi Manam, Priyanka Shivdasani, Arezou A Ghazani, Ai Ling Wang, Murat Bastepe, Himisha Beltran, Katherine A Janeway, Alanna Church, Alicia Pollaci, Anuradha B Chittenden, Diane R Koeller, Alison Schwartz Levine, Judy E Garber, Bruce E Johnson, Neal I Lindeman, Jonathan A Nowak, Lynette M Sholl, Laura E MacConaill\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmoldx.2025.06.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Genomic profiling of cancers informs diagnostic and prognostic classification and aids in selection of targeted therapeutics. Targeted, next-generation sequencing of cancer-specific genes is clinically feasible and enables comprehensive somatic reporting; without a matched germline specimen, germline alterations can confound analyses of the somatic profile and create uncertainty in interpretation. We report the validation and implementation of optional matched tumor/germline sequencing in our precision cancer medicine program. Sixty-three cases were selected for technical validation. DNA was analyzed using OncoPanel, a hybrid capture-based sequencing assay of 461 cancer genes. Three analytical pipelines were implemented: tumor-only, matched tumor/germline, and germline-only. For matched tumor/germline, we \\\"rescued\\\" germline alterations in 19 genes with actionable/therapeutic implications. We retrospectively analyzed the first 1600 matched cases to determine the potential clinical utility of this approach. Limit of detection for point mutations/indels was 3% allele fraction; reproducibility was >98%. Matched tumor/germline concordance across 938 somatic calls was 100%. The average TMB was ∼4 mutations/Mb lower than tumor-only sequencing. TMB-high patients were accurately reclassified as TMB-low in 14% of cases. 25% of validation cases (14% post-launch) had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variant conferring cancer susceptibility; 14% of validation cases (7% post-launch) harbored a germline variant of therapeutic significance. Matched tumor/germline sequencing is more accurate than tumor-only sequencing, while still encompassing all genomic findings that inform targeted therapy selection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2025.06.005\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2025.06.005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

癌症的基因组图谱为诊断和预后分类提供信息,并有助于选择靶向治疗方法。针对癌症特异性基因的下一代测序在临床上是可行的,并且可以进行全面的体细胞报告;如果没有匹配的种系标本,种系的改变会混淆对体细胞剖面的分析,并在解释中产生不确定性。我们报告了在我们的精确癌症医学项目中可选匹配肿瘤/生殖系测序的验证和实施。选择63例进行技术验证。使用OncoPanel分析DNA,这是一种基于混合捕获的461种癌症基因测序方法。实施了三种分析管道:仅肿瘤,匹配肿瘤/生殖系和仅生殖系。对于匹配的肿瘤/生殖系,我们“挽救”了19个具有可操作/治疗意义的基因的生殖系改变。我们回顾性分析了最初的1600例匹配病例,以确定该方法的潜在临床应用。点突变/索引的检出限为3%;重现性为98%。938个体细胞呼叫的肿瘤/种系一致性为100%。平均TMB比仅肿瘤测序低约4个突变/Mb。14%的tmb -高患者被准确地重新分类为tmb -低。25%的验证病例(发射后14%)具有致病性或可能致病性种系变异,具有癌症易感性;14%的验证病例(发射后7%)携带治疗意义的种系变异。匹配的肿瘤/种系测序比仅肿瘤测序更准确,同时仍然包含所有的基因组发现,为靶向治疗选择提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Implementation of Matched Tumor/Germline Sequencing Improves Accuracy of Tumor Genomic Profiling and Therapeutic Recommendations.

Genomic profiling of cancers informs diagnostic and prognostic classification and aids in selection of targeted therapeutics. Targeted, next-generation sequencing of cancer-specific genes is clinically feasible and enables comprehensive somatic reporting; without a matched germline specimen, germline alterations can confound analyses of the somatic profile and create uncertainty in interpretation. We report the validation and implementation of optional matched tumor/germline sequencing in our precision cancer medicine program. Sixty-three cases were selected for technical validation. DNA was analyzed using OncoPanel, a hybrid capture-based sequencing assay of 461 cancer genes. Three analytical pipelines were implemented: tumor-only, matched tumor/germline, and germline-only. For matched tumor/germline, we "rescued" germline alterations in 19 genes with actionable/therapeutic implications. We retrospectively analyzed the first 1600 matched cases to determine the potential clinical utility of this approach. Limit of detection for point mutations/indels was 3% allele fraction; reproducibility was >98%. Matched tumor/germline concordance across 938 somatic calls was 100%. The average TMB was ∼4 mutations/Mb lower than tumor-only sequencing. TMB-high patients were accurately reclassified as TMB-low in 14% of cases. 25% of validation cases (14% post-launch) had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variant conferring cancer susceptibility; 14% of validation cases (7% post-launch) harbored a germline variant of therapeutic significance. Matched tumor/germline sequencing is more accurate than tumor-only sequencing, while still encompassing all genomic findings that inform targeted therapy selection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
2.40%
发文量
143
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, the official publication of the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP), co-owned by the American Society for Investigative Pathology (ASIP), seeks to publish high quality original papers on scientific advances in the translation and validation of molecular discoveries in medicine into the clinical diagnostic setting, and the description and application of technological advances in the field of molecular diagnostic medicine. The editors welcome for review articles that contain: novel discoveries or clinicopathologic correlations including studies in oncology, infectious diseases, inherited diseases, predisposition to disease, clinical informatics, or the description of polymorphisms linked to disease states or normal variations; the application of diagnostic methodologies in clinical trials; or the development of new or improved molecular methods which may be applied to diagnosis or monitoring of disease or disease predisposition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信