扩展了CT剂量学中多次扫描平均剂量测量的适用性。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Ákos Sudár, Tamás Pócza, Richárd Elek, Tibor Major, Ádám Domonkos Tárnoki, Dávid László Tárnoki, Csilla Pesznyák
{"title":"扩展了CT剂量学中多次扫描平均剂量测量的适用性。","authors":"Ákos Sudár, Tamás Pócza, Richárd Elek, Tibor Major, Ádám Domonkos Tárnoki, Dávid László Tárnoki, Csilla Pesznyák","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/adf40d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>The CT dose index (CTDI) can be directly measured only for axial scan protocols; however, these days, helical protocols are applied in most cases, and sometimes axial protocols are not even available. The multiple scan average dose (MSAD) method can address this issue, but it is not widely adopted. This article aims to support the appropriateness of the MSAD method first by showing that it is measurable with the CTDI tools, and second by presenting a simple rule for scan pitch to avoid the main uncertainty of the measurement.<i>Approach.</i>Monte Carlo simulation was combined with its analytical postprocessing to accurately calculate scattering and speed up calculations to investigate several imaging and beam parameter combinations. The calculations were validated by measurements, and the model was used to examine the uncertainty of MSAD caused by an uncontrolled parameter.<i>Main results.</i>The widespread 150 mm long CTDI phantom and the 100 mm long ionization chamber are applicable for the MSAD method and reach80.8±0.2% efficiency in the estimation of CTDI<sub>vol</sub>, in contrast to78.0±0.3% efficiency of the CTDI<sub>100</sub>method. By utilizing the periodicity of the MSAD measurement, the uncertainty can be reduced to1.38±0.02% in contrast to26.85±0.16% in the worst case.<i>Significance.</i>The MSAD measurement with the CTDI setup is slightly more efficient than the CTDI<sub>100</sub>measurement protocol, so there is no need for a long phantom or farmer chamber to use MSAD in quality assurance (QA) measurements. The MSAD applies to both helical and axial scans; therefore, we recommend using direct MSAD measurement for QA in the clinical environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expansion of applicability of multiple scan average dose measurements for CT dosimetry.\",\"authors\":\"Ákos Sudár, Tamás Pócza, Richárd Elek, Tibor Major, Ádám Domonkos Tárnoki, Dávid László Tárnoki, Csilla Pesznyák\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-6560/adf40d\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>The CT dose index (CTDI) can be directly measured only for axial scan protocols; however, these days, helical protocols are applied in most cases, and sometimes axial protocols are not even available. The multiple scan average dose (MSAD) method can address this issue, but it is not widely adopted. This article aims to support the appropriateness of the MSAD method first by showing that it is measurable with the CTDI tools, and second by presenting a simple rule for scan pitch to avoid the main uncertainty of the measurement.<i>Approach.</i>Monte Carlo simulation was combined with its analytical postprocessing to accurately calculate scattering and speed up calculations to investigate several imaging and beam parameter combinations. The calculations were validated by measurements, and the model was used to examine the uncertainty of MSAD caused by an uncontrolled parameter.<i>Main results.</i>The widespread 150 mm long CTDI phantom and the 100 mm long ionization chamber are applicable for the MSAD method and reach80.8±0.2% efficiency in the estimation of CTDI<sub>vol</sub>, in contrast to78.0±0.3% efficiency of the CTDI<sub>100</sub>method. By utilizing the periodicity of the MSAD measurement, the uncertainty can be reduced to1.38±0.02% in contrast to26.85±0.16% in the worst case.<i>Significance.</i>The MSAD measurement with the CTDI setup is slightly more efficient than the CTDI<sub>100</sub>measurement protocol, so there is no need for a long phantom or farmer chamber to use MSAD in quality assurance (QA) measurements. The MSAD applies to both helical and axial scans; therefore, we recommend using direct MSAD measurement for QA in the clinical environment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics in medicine and biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics in medicine and biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/adf40d\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/adf40d","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:为了保证质量,必须应用轴向扫描几何来验证显示的CT剂量指数(CTDI)值。这在较新的机器上通常不可用。多次扫描平均剂量(MSAD)方法早前被提出以规避这一问题,但尚未成为普遍的方法。将蒙特卡罗模拟与分析后处理相结合,精确计算散射并加快计算速度,研究了几种成像和光束参数组合。通过实测验证了计算结果的正确性,并利用该模型对某一非受控参数引起的MSAD不确定度进行了检验。通过利用MSAD测量的周期性,不确定度可以降低到0.2%,而在最坏的情况下为26.4%。广泛的150mm长的CTDI幻体和100mm长的电离室适用于MSAD方法,在CTDIvol的估计效率达到81%,而CTDI100方法的效率为78% . ;使用CTDI设置的MSAD测量比CTDI100测量协议稍微有效一些。此外,它适用于螺旋和轴向扫描,因此我们建议在临床环境中使用直接MSAD测量来保证质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Expansion of applicability of multiple scan average dose measurements for CT dosimetry.

Objective.The CT dose index (CTDI) can be directly measured only for axial scan protocols; however, these days, helical protocols are applied in most cases, and sometimes axial protocols are not even available. The multiple scan average dose (MSAD) method can address this issue, but it is not widely adopted. This article aims to support the appropriateness of the MSAD method first by showing that it is measurable with the CTDI tools, and second by presenting a simple rule for scan pitch to avoid the main uncertainty of the measurement.Approach.Monte Carlo simulation was combined with its analytical postprocessing to accurately calculate scattering and speed up calculations to investigate several imaging and beam parameter combinations. The calculations were validated by measurements, and the model was used to examine the uncertainty of MSAD caused by an uncontrolled parameter.Main results.The widespread 150 mm long CTDI phantom and the 100 mm long ionization chamber are applicable for the MSAD method and reach80.8±0.2% efficiency in the estimation of CTDIvol, in contrast to78.0±0.3% efficiency of the CTDI100method. By utilizing the periodicity of the MSAD measurement, the uncertainty can be reduced to1.38±0.02% in contrast to26.85±0.16% in the worst case.Significance.The MSAD measurement with the CTDI setup is slightly more efficient than the CTDI100measurement protocol, so there is no need for a long phantom or farmer chamber to use MSAD in quality assurance (QA) measurements. The MSAD applies to both helical and axial scans; therefore, we recommend using direct MSAD measurement for QA in the clinical environment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physics in medicine and biology
Physics in medicine and biology 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
409
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信