粘弹性护理点测试(ClotPro®)指导急性缺血性卒中患者DOACs静脉溶栓:在一项概念验证研究中用止血取代病史

IF 3 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jessica Seetge, Balázs Cséke, Zsófia Nozomi Karádi, Edit Bosnyák, Eszter Johanna Jozifek, László Szapáry
{"title":"粘弹性护理点测试(ClotPro®)指导急性缺血性卒中患者DOACs静脉溶栓:在一项概念验证研究中用止血取代病史","authors":"Jessica Seetge, Balázs Cséke, Zsófia Nozomi Karádi, Edit Bosnyák, Eszter Johanna Jozifek, László Szapáry","doi":"10.3390/neurolint17070103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Administering intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) remains a clinical challenge. Current guidelines restrict IVT within 48 h of DOAC intake unless anticoagulant activity can be confidently excluded. However, reliable medication histories are often unavailable, and conventional coagulation tests inadequately detect DOAC activity. This study evaluated whether viscoelastic point-of-care testing (ClotPro<sup>®</sup>) could identify the absence of anticoagulant effect in AIS patients on DOACs, thus enabling IVT administration and potentially improving clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of 40 AIS patients with documented DOAC use, admitted between February 2023 and May 2025. ClotPro<sup>®</sup> was performed at admission using the Russell's viper venom (RVV) assay for factor Xa inhibitors and the ecarin clotting time (ECT) assay for dabigatran. Subtherapeutic anticoagulation was defined as a clotting time (CT) of <100 s for RVV and <180 s for ECT, respectively. Patients identified as being subtherapeutic were assessed for IVT eligibility. To evaluate IVT effects, we performed propensity score-matched bootstrap resampling (1000 iterations), matching patients by age, admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), and pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Primary endpoints were NIHSS-shift (change from admission to 72 h) and mRS-shift (change from pre-stroke mRS to 90-day mRS). Predictors of outcomes were analyzed using multivariate regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ClotPro<sup>®</sup> identified 15/40 patients (37.5%) as subtherapeutic, all on factor Xa inhibitors. Of these, seven received IVT. In matched analyses, IVT-treated patients showed a numerically greater neurological improvement than untreated patients (mean NIHSS-shift: -2.83 vs. 3.94; mean difference: -6.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -24.00 to 7.55; <i>p</i> = 0.495). Functional outcome by mRS-shift showed only minor differences between groups (2.74 vs. 2.10 mean difference: 0.64; 95% CI: -2.00 to 2.50; <i>p</i> = 0.510). IVT showed a favorable trend for early neurological recovery (<i>p</i> = 0.081) but was not independently associated with functional outcome (<i>p</i> = 0.380).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ClotPro<sup>®</sup> identified a substantial subset of AIS patients on DOAC therapy without measurable anticoagulant activity, enabling IVT in cases that would otherwise have been excluded based on medication history. These findings support the feasibility of ClotPro<sup>®</sup>-guided decision-making in acute stroke care and highlight its potential to improve IVT selection by enabling real-time assessment of coagulation status at the bedside.</p>","PeriodicalId":19130,"journal":{"name":"Neurology International","volume":"17 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12299928/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Viscoelastic Point-of-Care Testing (ClotPro<sup>®</sup>) to Guide Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients on DOACs: Replacing History with Hemostasis in a Proof-of-Concept Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Seetge, Balázs Cséke, Zsófia Nozomi Karádi, Edit Bosnyák, Eszter Johanna Jozifek, László Szapáry\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/neurolint17070103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Administering intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) remains a clinical challenge. Current guidelines restrict IVT within 48 h of DOAC intake unless anticoagulant activity can be confidently excluded. However, reliable medication histories are often unavailable, and conventional coagulation tests inadequately detect DOAC activity. This study evaluated whether viscoelastic point-of-care testing (ClotPro<sup>®</sup>) could identify the absence of anticoagulant effect in AIS patients on DOACs, thus enabling IVT administration and potentially improving clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of 40 AIS patients with documented DOAC use, admitted between February 2023 and May 2025. ClotPro<sup>®</sup> was performed at admission using the Russell's viper venom (RVV) assay for factor Xa inhibitors and the ecarin clotting time (ECT) assay for dabigatran. Subtherapeutic anticoagulation was defined as a clotting time (CT) of <100 s for RVV and <180 s for ECT, respectively. Patients identified as being subtherapeutic were assessed for IVT eligibility. To evaluate IVT effects, we performed propensity score-matched bootstrap resampling (1000 iterations), matching patients by age, admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), and pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Primary endpoints were NIHSS-shift (change from admission to 72 h) and mRS-shift (change from pre-stroke mRS to 90-day mRS). Predictors of outcomes were analyzed using multivariate regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ClotPro<sup>®</sup> identified 15/40 patients (37.5%) as subtherapeutic, all on factor Xa inhibitors. Of these, seven received IVT. In matched analyses, IVT-treated patients showed a numerically greater neurological improvement than untreated patients (mean NIHSS-shift: -2.83 vs. 3.94; mean difference: -6.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -24.00 to 7.55; <i>p</i> = 0.495). Functional outcome by mRS-shift showed only minor differences between groups (2.74 vs. 2.10 mean difference: 0.64; 95% CI: -2.00 to 2.50; <i>p</i> = 0.510). IVT showed a favorable trend for early neurological recovery (<i>p</i> = 0.081) but was not independently associated with functional outcome (<i>p</i> = 0.380).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ClotPro<sup>®</sup> identified a substantial subset of AIS patients on DOAC therapy without measurable anticoagulant activity, enabling IVT in cases that would otherwise have been excluded based on medication history. These findings support the feasibility of ClotPro<sup>®</sup>-guided decision-making in acute stroke care and highlight its potential to improve IVT selection by enabling real-time assessment of coagulation status at the bedside.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19130,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurology International\",\"volume\":\"17 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12299928/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/neurolint17070103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/neurolint17070103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)静脉溶栓(IVT)仍然是一个临床挑战。目前的指南限制在DOAC摄入后48小时内进行IVT,除非可以排除抗凝血活性。然而,可靠的用药史往往是不可获得的,传统的凝血试验不能充分检测DOAC活性。本研究评估了粘弹性护理点测试(ClotPro®)是否可以识别AIS患者在DOACs上抗凝作用的缺失,从而使IVT给药并可能改善临床结果。方法:我们对2023年2月至2025年5月收治的40例有DOAC使用记录的AIS患者进行了一项前瞻性观察队列研究。入院时使用罗素毒蛇毒液(RVV)测定Xa因子抑制剂和达比加群凝血时间(ECT)测定ClotPro®。结果:ClotPro®鉴定出15/40例(37.5%)患者为亚治疗性抗凝,所有患者均使用Xa因子抑制剂。其中,7人接受静脉注射。在匹配分析中,ivt治疗的患者比未治疗的患者表现出更大的神经系统改善(平均NIHSS-shift: -2.83 vs. 3.94;平均差值:-6.76,95%置信区间[CI]: -24.00 ~ 7.55;P = 0.495)。mRS-shift的功能预后在两组间仅显示轻微差异(2.74 vs 2.10),平均差异:0.64;95% CI: -2.00 ~ 2.50;P = 0.510)。IVT对早期神经功能恢复有有利的趋势(p = 0.081),但与功能预后无独立相关性(p = 0.380)。结论:ClotPro®确定了大量接受DOAC治疗的AIS患者,没有可测量的抗凝血活性,使IVT成为可能,否则根据用药史将被排除在外。这些发现支持ClotPro®指导急性卒中护理决策的可行性,并强调其通过在床边实时评估凝血状态来改善IVT选择的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Viscoelastic Point-of-Care Testing (ClotPro®) to Guide Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients on DOACs: Replacing History with Hemostasis in a Proof-of-Concept Study.

Background: Administering intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) remains a clinical challenge. Current guidelines restrict IVT within 48 h of DOAC intake unless anticoagulant activity can be confidently excluded. However, reliable medication histories are often unavailable, and conventional coagulation tests inadequately detect DOAC activity. This study evaluated whether viscoelastic point-of-care testing (ClotPro®) could identify the absence of anticoagulant effect in AIS patients on DOACs, thus enabling IVT administration and potentially improving clinical outcomes.

Methods: We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of 40 AIS patients with documented DOAC use, admitted between February 2023 and May 2025. ClotPro® was performed at admission using the Russell's viper venom (RVV) assay for factor Xa inhibitors and the ecarin clotting time (ECT) assay for dabigatran. Subtherapeutic anticoagulation was defined as a clotting time (CT) of <100 s for RVV and <180 s for ECT, respectively. Patients identified as being subtherapeutic were assessed for IVT eligibility. To evaluate IVT effects, we performed propensity score-matched bootstrap resampling (1000 iterations), matching patients by age, admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), and pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Primary endpoints were NIHSS-shift (change from admission to 72 h) and mRS-shift (change from pre-stroke mRS to 90-day mRS). Predictors of outcomes were analyzed using multivariate regression models.

Results: ClotPro® identified 15/40 patients (37.5%) as subtherapeutic, all on factor Xa inhibitors. Of these, seven received IVT. In matched analyses, IVT-treated patients showed a numerically greater neurological improvement than untreated patients (mean NIHSS-shift: -2.83 vs. 3.94; mean difference: -6.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -24.00 to 7.55; p = 0.495). Functional outcome by mRS-shift showed only minor differences between groups (2.74 vs. 2.10 mean difference: 0.64; 95% CI: -2.00 to 2.50; p = 0.510). IVT showed a favorable trend for early neurological recovery (p = 0.081) but was not independently associated with functional outcome (p = 0.380).

Conclusions: ClotPro® identified a substantial subset of AIS patients on DOAC therapy without measurable anticoagulant activity, enabling IVT in cases that would otherwise have been excluded based on medication history. These findings support the feasibility of ClotPro®-guided decision-making in acute stroke care and highlight its potential to improve IVT selection by enabling real-time assessment of coagulation status at the bedside.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurology International
Neurology International CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
69
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信