阿尔茨海默病和痴呆症遗传风险评分的研究进展:系统综述。

IF 3 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Stefanos N Sampatakakis, Niki Mourtzi, Alex Hatzimanolis, Nikolaos Scarmeas
{"title":"阿尔茨海默病和痴呆症遗传风险评分的研究进展:系统综述。","authors":"Stefanos N Sampatakakis, Niki Mourtzi, Alex Hatzimanolis, Nikolaos Scarmeas","doi":"10.3390/neurolint17070099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research concerning the genetic risk for dementia has recently been headed towards new directions. Novel findings from genome-wide association studies have highlighted the association of Alzheimer's disease incidence with many gene polymorphisms, apart from the Apolipoprotein-E genotype. The identification of additional genetic risk factors has led to the construction of specific genetic risk scores for dementia, considering many different genetic factors and specific biological pathways related to Alzheimer's disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis method, summarizing existing data regarding genetic risk scores for Alzheimer's disease and dementia, in order to improve the current understanding of the genetic underpinnings of dementia. In specific, five databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of science, and Cochrane Central) were searched using the keywords \"genetic risk score\", \"Alzheimer's disease\", and \"dementia\" with specific inclusion and exclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the 552 articles identified, we finally included 20 studies for the qualitative analysis. These reports were classified in three different categories of genetic scores: \"polygenic risk scores (PRSs)\" (including 11 studies), \"pathway specific polygenic risk scores (p-PRSs)\" (5 studies), and \"complex genetic risk scores\" (4 studies).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Existing genetic risk scores have contributed to better dementia prediction and a better understanding of the underlying pathology. Novel approaches integrating multiple polygenic risk scores might ameliorate the accuracy of genetic risk scores. The combination of polygenic risk scores that are specific to related biological pathways or relevant biomarkers is of utmost importance to achieve a better predictive ability.</p>","PeriodicalId":19130,"journal":{"name":"Neurology International","volume":"17 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12298128/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advances in Genetic Risk Scores for Alzheimer's Disease and Dementia: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Stefanos N Sampatakakis, Niki Mourtzi, Alex Hatzimanolis, Nikolaos Scarmeas\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/neurolint17070099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research concerning the genetic risk for dementia has recently been headed towards new directions. Novel findings from genome-wide association studies have highlighted the association of Alzheimer's disease incidence with many gene polymorphisms, apart from the Apolipoprotein-E genotype. The identification of additional genetic risk factors has led to the construction of specific genetic risk scores for dementia, considering many different genetic factors and specific biological pathways related to Alzheimer's disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis method, summarizing existing data regarding genetic risk scores for Alzheimer's disease and dementia, in order to improve the current understanding of the genetic underpinnings of dementia. In specific, five databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of science, and Cochrane Central) were searched using the keywords \\\"genetic risk score\\\", \\\"Alzheimer's disease\\\", and \\\"dementia\\\" with specific inclusion and exclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the 552 articles identified, we finally included 20 studies for the qualitative analysis. These reports were classified in three different categories of genetic scores: \\\"polygenic risk scores (PRSs)\\\" (including 11 studies), \\\"pathway specific polygenic risk scores (p-PRSs)\\\" (5 studies), and \\\"complex genetic risk scores\\\" (4 studies).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Existing genetic risk scores have contributed to better dementia prediction and a better understanding of the underlying pathology. Novel approaches integrating multiple polygenic risk scores might ameliorate the accuracy of genetic risk scores. The combination of polygenic risk scores that are specific to related biological pathways or relevant biomarkers is of utmost importance to achieve a better predictive ability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19130,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurology International\",\"volume\":\"17 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12298128/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/neurolint17070099\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/neurolint17070099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于痴呆症遗传风险的研究最近有了新的方向。全基因组关联研究的新发现强调了阿尔茨海默病的发病率与许多基因多态性的关联,除了载脂蛋白e基因型。对其他遗传风险因素的识别导致了痴呆症特定遗传风险评分的构建,考虑了许多不同的遗传因素和与阿尔茨海默病相关的特定生物学途径。方法:我们按照系统评价的首选报告项目和荟萃分析方法进行了系统评价,总结了有关阿尔茨海默病和痴呆遗传风险评分的现有数据,以提高目前对痴呆遗传基础的理解。具体而言,我们使用关键词“遗传风险评分”、“阿尔茨海默病”和“痴呆”进行了5个数据库(PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase、Scopus、Web of science和Cochrane Central)的检索,并给出了特定的纳入和排除标准。结果:从552篇文章中,我们最终纳入了20篇研究进行定性分析。这些报告被分为三种不同的遗传评分:“多基因风险评分(PRSs)”。(包括11项研究),“通路特异性多基因风险评分(p-PRSs)”(5项研究)和“复杂遗传风险评分”(4项研究)。结论:现有的遗传风险评分有助于更好地预测痴呆和更好地了解潜在病理。整合多个多基因风险评分的新方法可能改善遗传风险评分的准确性。结合相关生物学途径或相关生物标志物特异性的多基因风险评分对于获得更好的预测能力至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Advances in Genetic Risk Scores for Alzheimer's Disease and Dementia: A Systematic Review.

Advances in Genetic Risk Scores for Alzheimer's Disease and Dementia: A Systematic Review.

Background: Research concerning the genetic risk for dementia has recently been headed towards new directions. Novel findings from genome-wide association studies have highlighted the association of Alzheimer's disease incidence with many gene polymorphisms, apart from the Apolipoprotein-E genotype. The identification of additional genetic risk factors has led to the construction of specific genetic risk scores for dementia, considering many different genetic factors and specific biological pathways related to Alzheimer's disease.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis method, summarizing existing data regarding genetic risk scores for Alzheimer's disease and dementia, in order to improve the current understanding of the genetic underpinnings of dementia. In specific, five databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of science, and Cochrane Central) were searched using the keywords "genetic risk score", "Alzheimer's disease", and "dementia" with specific inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Results: From the 552 articles identified, we finally included 20 studies for the qualitative analysis. These reports were classified in three different categories of genetic scores: "polygenic risk scores (PRSs)" (including 11 studies), "pathway specific polygenic risk scores (p-PRSs)" (5 studies), and "complex genetic risk scores" (4 studies).

Conclusions: Existing genetic risk scores have contributed to better dementia prediction and a better understanding of the underlying pathology. Novel approaches integrating multiple polygenic risk scores might ameliorate the accuracy of genetic risk scores. The combination of polygenic risk scores that are specific to related biological pathways or relevant biomarkers is of utmost importance to achieve a better predictive ability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurology International
Neurology International CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
69
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信