{"title":"来自黑人卫生保健专业人员的信息对COVID疫苗接种的影响","authors":"Martin Abel, Tanya Byker, Jeffrey Carpenter","doi":"10.1002/hec.70020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study experimentally tests the impact of providing information about vaccine safety and efficacy delivered by Black health care professionals. We find that providing general information increases vaccination rates after 5 months by 8 percentage points (17%), driven by a 9.8 pp (24%) increase among white participants. Political affiliation emerges as a key moderator to explain this discordant effect. Across race, general information is more effective for politically moderate and conservative respondents, most of whom are white. Among this most vaccine-hesitant group, the information effectively addresses concerns about both side effects and unknown long-run effects due to the fast approval of the vaccine, increasing vaccination rates by 14 pp.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12847,"journal":{"name":"Health economics","volume":"34 11","pages":"2072-2096"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Information From Black Health Care Professionals on COVID Vaccination Take-Up\",\"authors\":\"Martin Abel, Tanya Byker, Jeffrey Carpenter\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hec.70020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>This study experimentally tests the impact of providing information about vaccine safety and efficacy delivered by Black health care professionals. We find that providing general information increases vaccination rates after 5 months by 8 percentage points (17%), driven by a 9.8 pp (24%) increase among white participants. Political affiliation emerges as a key moderator to explain this discordant effect. Across race, general information is more effective for politically moderate and conservative respondents, most of whom are white. Among this most vaccine-hesitant group, the information effectively addresses concerns about both side effects and unknown long-run effects due to the fast approval of the vaccine, increasing vaccination rates by 14 pp.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health economics\",\"volume\":\"34 11\",\"pages\":\"2072-2096\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hec.70020\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hec.70020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Effect of Information From Black Health Care Professionals on COVID Vaccination Take-Up
This study experimentally tests the impact of providing information about vaccine safety and efficacy delivered by Black health care professionals. We find that providing general information increases vaccination rates after 5 months by 8 percentage points (17%), driven by a 9.8 pp (24%) increase among white participants. Political affiliation emerges as a key moderator to explain this discordant effect. Across race, general information is more effective for politically moderate and conservative respondents, most of whom are white. Among this most vaccine-hesitant group, the information effectively addresses concerns about both side effects and unknown long-run effects due to the fast approval of the vaccine, increasing vaccination rates by 14 pp.
期刊介绍：
This Journal publishes articles on all aspects of health economics: theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy from the economic perspective. Its scope includes the determinants of health and its definition and valuation, as well as the demand for and supply of health care; planning and market mechanisms; micro-economic evaluation of individual procedures and treatments; and evaluation of the performance of health care systems.
Contributions should typically be original and innovative. As a rule, the Journal does not include routine applications of cost-effectiveness analysis, discrete choice experiments and costing analyses.
Editorials are regular features, these should be concise and topical. Occasionally commissioned reviews are published and special issues bring together contributions on a single topic. Health Economics Letters facilitate rapid exchange of views on topical issues. Contributions related to problems in both developed and developing countries are welcome.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
