评估无针机器人辅助脊柱手术的可行性:一项对印度750例胸腰椎使用3,924枚螺钉的前瞻性研究。

IF 2.7 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Abhishek Soni, Vidyadhara Srinivasa, Balamurugan Thirugnanam, Madhava Pai Kanhangad, Akhil Xavier Joseph
{"title":"评估无针机器人辅助脊柱手术的可行性:一项对印度750例胸腰椎使用3,924枚螺钉的前瞻性研究。","authors":"Abhishek Soni, Vidyadhara Srinivasa, Balamurugan Thirugnanam, Madhava Pai Kanhangad, Akhil Xavier Joseph","doi":"10.31616/asj.2025.0066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>This single-center prospective study compared pin-mounted and pinless robot-assisted techniques for thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility, accuracy, and safety of a novel pinless technique in comparison to the traditional pin-mounted method in thoracolumbar fusion surgery.</p><p><strong>Overview of literature: </strong>Robot-assisted spine surgery has enhanced the precision of pedicle screw placement and reduced radiation exposure. While conventional pin-mounted techniques are effective, they can lead to hardware-related complications. Emerging evidence indicates that eliminating bone-mounted fixation could streamline the surgical workflow without compromising accuracy or safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 750 consecutive patients who underwent robot-assisted thoracolumbar fusion were enrolled. Two groups were defined: 200 cases (890 screws) using the pin-mounted approach and 550 cases (3,034 screws) utilizing the pinless method. All procedures employed intraoperative computed tomography imaging and a standardized protocol with a table-mounted robotic system. Screw accuracy was assessed using the Gertzbein-Robbins grading system, with grades A and B classified as acceptable. Secondary parameters, including operative time, blood loss, and radiation exposure, were also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pin-mounted group achieved an overall pedicle screw accuracy of 99.55% compared to 99.40% in the pinless group (p >0.05). There were four breaches in the pin-mounted group and 18 breaches in the pinless group, all of which were revised intraoperatively, with no permanent neurovascular injuries or major complications reported. Blood loss and radiation exposure were similar between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The pinless robot-assisted pedicle screw placement technique demonstrates accuracy and safety comparable to the traditional pin-mounted method. By eliminating bone-mounted fixation, this approach simplifies the surgical workflow and reduces hardwarerelated complications, making it an effective alternative for thoracolumbar fusion surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":8555,"journal":{"name":"Asian Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the feasibility of pinless robot-assisted spine surgery: a prospective study of 750 cases and 3,924 screws in the thoracolumbar spine in India.\",\"authors\":\"Abhishek Soni, Vidyadhara Srinivasa, Balamurugan Thirugnanam, Madhava Pai Kanhangad, Akhil Xavier Joseph\",\"doi\":\"10.31616/asj.2025.0066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>This single-center prospective study compared pin-mounted and pinless robot-assisted techniques for thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility, accuracy, and safety of a novel pinless technique in comparison to the traditional pin-mounted method in thoracolumbar fusion surgery.</p><p><strong>Overview of literature: </strong>Robot-assisted spine surgery has enhanced the precision of pedicle screw placement and reduced radiation exposure. While conventional pin-mounted techniques are effective, they can lead to hardware-related complications. Emerging evidence indicates that eliminating bone-mounted fixation could streamline the surgical workflow without compromising accuracy or safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 750 consecutive patients who underwent robot-assisted thoracolumbar fusion were enrolled. Two groups were defined: 200 cases (890 screws) using the pin-mounted approach and 550 cases (3,034 screws) utilizing the pinless method. All procedures employed intraoperative computed tomography imaging and a standardized protocol with a table-mounted robotic system. Screw accuracy was assessed using the Gertzbein-Robbins grading system, with grades A and B classified as acceptable. Secondary parameters, including operative time, blood loss, and radiation exposure, were also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pin-mounted group achieved an overall pedicle screw accuracy of 99.55% compared to 99.40% in the pinless group (p >0.05). There were four breaches in the pin-mounted group and 18 breaches in the pinless group, all of which were revised intraoperatively, with no permanent neurovascular injuries or major complications reported. Blood loss and radiation exposure were similar between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The pinless robot-assisted pedicle screw placement technique demonstrates accuracy and safety comparable to the traditional pin-mounted method. By eliminating bone-mounted fixation, this approach simplifies the surgical workflow and reduces hardwarerelated complications, making it an effective alternative for thoracolumbar fusion surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2025.0066\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2025.0066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计:这项单中心前瞻性研究比较了胸腰椎椎弓根螺钉置入的钉固定和无钉机器人辅助技术。目的:评价一种新型无针技术在胸腰椎融合手术中的可行性、准确性和安全性,并与传统的固定针方法进行比较。文献综述:机器人辅助脊柱手术提高了椎弓根螺钉置入的精度,减少了辐射暴露。虽然传统的引脚安装技术是有效的,但它们可能导致硬件相关的并发症。新出现的证据表明,消除骨固定可以简化手术工作流程,而不会影响准确性和安全性。方法:总共750名连续接受机器人辅助胸腰椎融合的患者被纳入研究。分为两组:200例(890颗螺钉)采用钉入方法,550例(3034颗螺钉)采用无钉入方法。所有手术均采用术中计算机断层扫描成像和标准化的桌面机器人系统。采用Gertzbein-Robbins分级系统评估螺钉精度,A级和B级为可接受。次要参数,包括手术时间、出血量和辐射暴露也被记录下来。结果:与无钉组的99.40%相比,有钉组的整体椎弓根螺钉精确度为99.55% (p < 0.05)。钉入组有4个切口,无钉入组有18个切口,术中全部修复,无永久性神经血管损伤或重大并发症报道。两组之间的失血和辐射暴露相似。结论:无钉机器人辅助椎弓根螺钉置入技术与传统的钉固定方法相比具有准确性和安全性。通过消除骨固定,该方法简化了手术流程,减少了硬件相关并发症,使其成为胸腰椎融合手术的有效替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the feasibility of pinless robot-assisted spine surgery: a prospective study of 750 cases and 3,924 screws in the thoracolumbar spine in India.

Study design: This single-center prospective study compared pin-mounted and pinless robot-assisted techniques for thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement.

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility, accuracy, and safety of a novel pinless technique in comparison to the traditional pin-mounted method in thoracolumbar fusion surgery.

Overview of literature: Robot-assisted spine surgery has enhanced the precision of pedicle screw placement and reduced radiation exposure. While conventional pin-mounted techniques are effective, they can lead to hardware-related complications. Emerging evidence indicates that eliminating bone-mounted fixation could streamline the surgical workflow without compromising accuracy or safety.

Methods: A total of 750 consecutive patients who underwent robot-assisted thoracolumbar fusion were enrolled. Two groups were defined: 200 cases (890 screws) using the pin-mounted approach and 550 cases (3,034 screws) utilizing the pinless method. All procedures employed intraoperative computed tomography imaging and a standardized protocol with a table-mounted robotic system. Screw accuracy was assessed using the Gertzbein-Robbins grading system, with grades A and B classified as acceptable. Secondary parameters, including operative time, blood loss, and radiation exposure, were also recorded.

Results: The pin-mounted group achieved an overall pedicle screw accuracy of 99.55% compared to 99.40% in the pinless group (p >0.05). There were four breaches in the pin-mounted group and 18 breaches in the pinless group, all of which were revised intraoperatively, with no permanent neurovascular injuries or major complications reported. Blood loss and radiation exposure were similar between the groups.

Conclusions: The pinless robot-assisted pedicle screw placement technique demonstrates accuracy and safety comparable to the traditional pin-mounted method. By eliminating bone-mounted fixation, this approach simplifies the surgical workflow and reduces hardwarerelated complications, making it an effective alternative for thoracolumbar fusion surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Spine Journal
Asian Spine Journal ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
108
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信