Anthony N Baumann, Robert J Trager, Omkar Anaspure, Shiv Patel, Nikhil Sai, Mathias A Uhler, Keegan T Conry, Gordon Preston, Jacob C Hoffmann
{"title":"各种前路非连续颈椎手术治疗非连续颈椎退行性椎间盘病的有效性:网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Anthony N Baumann, Robert J Trager, Omkar Anaspure, Shiv Patel, Nikhil Sai, Mathias A Uhler, Keegan T Conry, Gordon Preston, Jacob C Hoffmann","doi":"10.31616/asj.2024.0527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the effectiveness of noncontiguous anterior cervical surgical techniques for noncontiguous cervical degenerative disk disease (CDDD) in terms of clinical outcomes. There is a lack of consensus regarding optimal surgical management of noncontiguous CDDD. This NMA compared the clinical effectiveness of various anterior cervical surgical techniques to guide decision-making and improve patient outcomes. PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through October 10, 2024, for studies comparing noncontiguous anterior surgeries for noncontiguous CDDD. Mean differences (MD) and relative risks (RR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random-effects NMA models. Of the 504 articles retrieved, five cohort studies and one randomized trial were included. Patients (n=312; mean age, 51.8 years) underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with plate fixation (n=76), ACDF with zero-profile spacer (n=95), cervical disk arthroplasty (CDA; n=45), fusion-mobility hybrid cervical surgery (HCS; n=64), or fusion-fusion HCS (n=32). No significant differences or clear ranking superiority were observed for Japanese Orthopedic Association or Neck Disability Index scores. Compared to noncontiguous ACDF with plate fixation, noncontiguous ACDF with spacer and noncontiguous CDA had a significantly lower risk of postoperative complications. Additionally, noncontiguous ACDF with spacer had a significantly lower risk of dysphagia, and all other comparisons had a lower risk of intermediate adjacent segment disease (ASD). There were no cases of pseudoarthrosis, and one case of reoperation. Certainty of evidence was \"very low.\" This NMA provides very low certainty evidence of similar functional outcomes across surgical techniques for noncontiguous CDDD, but the risk of complications, intermediate segment ASD, and dysphagia may vary depending on technique. These findings highlight the need for higher-quality research to guide the selection of surgical technique for noncontiguous CDDD.</p>","PeriodicalId":8555,"journal":{"name":"Asian Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of various anterior noncontiguous cervical spine surgeries for treatment of noncontiguous cervical degenerative disk disease: a network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Anthony N Baumann, Robert J Trager, Omkar Anaspure, Shiv Patel, Nikhil Sai, Mathias A Uhler, Keegan T Conry, Gordon Preston, Jacob C Hoffmann\",\"doi\":\"10.31616/asj.2024.0527\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the effectiveness of noncontiguous anterior cervical surgical techniques for noncontiguous cervical degenerative disk disease (CDDD) in terms of clinical outcomes. There is a lack of consensus regarding optimal surgical management of noncontiguous CDDD. This NMA compared the clinical effectiveness of various anterior cervical surgical techniques to guide decision-making and improve patient outcomes. PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through October 10, 2024, for studies comparing noncontiguous anterior surgeries for noncontiguous CDDD. Mean differences (MD) and relative risks (RR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random-effects NMA models. Of the 504 articles retrieved, five cohort studies and one randomized trial were included. Patients (n=312; mean age, 51.8 years) underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with plate fixation (n=76), ACDF with zero-profile spacer (n=95), cervical disk arthroplasty (CDA; n=45), fusion-mobility hybrid cervical surgery (HCS; n=64), or fusion-fusion HCS (n=32). No significant differences or clear ranking superiority were observed for Japanese Orthopedic Association or Neck Disability Index scores. Compared to noncontiguous ACDF with plate fixation, noncontiguous ACDF with spacer and noncontiguous CDA had a significantly lower risk of postoperative complications. Additionally, noncontiguous ACDF with spacer had a significantly lower risk of dysphagia, and all other comparisons had a lower risk of intermediate adjacent segment disease (ASD). There were no cases of pseudoarthrosis, and one case of reoperation. Certainty of evidence was \\\"very low.\\\" This NMA provides very low certainty evidence of similar functional outcomes across surgical techniques for noncontiguous CDDD, but the risk of complications, intermediate segment ASD, and dysphagia may vary depending on technique. These findings highlight the need for higher-quality research to guide the selection of surgical technique for noncontiguous CDDD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2024.0527\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2024.0527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我们进行了一项系统综述和网络荟萃分析(NMA),以比较非连续性颈椎前路手术技术治疗非连续性颈椎退行性椎间盘病(CDDD)的临床效果。对于非连续性CDDD的最佳手术治疗缺乏共识。该NMA比较了各种颈椎前路手术技术的临床效果,以指导决策和改善患者预后。PubMed、CINAHL、Scopus和Web of Science检索截止到2024年10月10日,以比较非连续性前路手术治疗非连续性CDDD的研究。使用随机效应NMA模型计算具有相应95%置信区间(CI)的平均差异(MD)和相对风险(RR)。在检索到的504篇文章中,包括5项队列研究和1项随机试验。患者(n = 312;平均年龄51.8岁)接受了前路颈椎椎间盘切除术和融合(ACDF)钢板固定(n=76), ACDF与零轮廓间隔器(n=95),颈椎椎间盘置换术(CDA;n=45),融合-移动混合颈椎手术(HCS;n=64)或融合HCS (n=32)。在日本骨科协会或颈部残疾指数评分方面,没有观察到显著差异或明显的排名优势。与钢板固定的非连续ACDF相比,非连续ACDF加间隔器和非连续CDA的术后并发症风险明显降低。此外,带有间隔物的非连续ACDF发生吞咽困难的风险显著降低,所有其他比较的中间相邻节段疾病(ASD)的风险均较低。无假关节,1例再次手术。证据的确定性“非常低”。该NMA提供了非常低确定性的证据,证明不同手术技术治疗非连续性CDDD的功能结局相似,但并发症、中间节段ASD和吞咽困难的风险可能因技术而异。这些发现强调需要更高质量的研究来指导非连续性CDDD手术技术的选择。
Effectiveness of various anterior noncontiguous cervical spine surgeries for treatment of noncontiguous cervical degenerative disk disease: a network meta-analysis.
We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the effectiveness of noncontiguous anterior cervical surgical techniques for noncontiguous cervical degenerative disk disease (CDDD) in terms of clinical outcomes. There is a lack of consensus regarding optimal surgical management of noncontiguous CDDD. This NMA compared the clinical effectiveness of various anterior cervical surgical techniques to guide decision-making and improve patient outcomes. PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through October 10, 2024, for studies comparing noncontiguous anterior surgeries for noncontiguous CDDD. Mean differences (MD) and relative risks (RR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random-effects NMA models. Of the 504 articles retrieved, five cohort studies and one randomized trial were included. Patients (n=312; mean age, 51.8 years) underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with plate fixation (n=76), ACDF with zero-profile spacer (n=95), cervical disk arthroplasty (CDA; n=45), fusion-mobility hybrid cervical surgery (HCS; n=64), or fusion-fusion HCS (n=32). No significant differences or clear ranking superiority were observed for Japanese Orthopedic Association or Neck Disability Index scores. Compared to noncontiguous ACDF with plate fixation, noncontiguous ACDF with spacer and noncontiguous CDA had a significantly lower risk of postoperative complications. Additionally, noncontiguous ACDF with spacer had a significantly lower risk of dysphagia, and all other comparisons had a lower risk of intermediate adjacent segment disease (ASD). There were no cases of pseudoarthrosis, and one case of reoperation. Certainty of evidence was "very low." This NMA provides very low certainty evidence of similar functional outcomes across surgical techniques for noncontiguous CDDD, but the risk of complications, intermediate segment ASD, and dysphagia may vary depending on technique. These findings highlight the need for higher-quality research to guide the selection of surgical technique for noncontiguous CDDD.