平衡高龄患者血管内动脉瘤修复的风险和临床结果。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Kayoko Natsume, Yasutaka Saito, Syunsuke Miyahara, Mitsuru Asano
{"title":"平衡高龄患者血管内动脉瘤修复的风险和临床结果。","authors":"Kayoko Natsume, Yasutaka Saito, Syunsuke Miyahara, Mitsuru Asano","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.07.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) is a viable option for elderly patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm. In extremely elderly individuals with inherently limited survival, this study aimed to evaluate EVAR outcomes in nonagenarians and identify factors associated with favorable survival to refine selection criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 144 patients who underwent elective EVAR between April 2013 and August 2023. Patients were divided into those aged <90 years (younger group, n=132) and ≥90 years (nonagenarian group, n=12). Primary outcomes included postoperative morbidity and mortality. Additionally, we explored potential risk factors for early mortality in the nonagenarian group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences between the groups in 30-day (p=0.840), aneurysm-related mortality (p=0.769), or postoperative morbidity (p=0.297). At 1 year, the survival rate was 67% in the nonagenarian group and 90% in the younger group (p=0.116). While this difference was not significant, the overall Kaplan-Meier survival curve demonstrated a significant divergence between the two groups (p=0.012). Four nonagenarians died within 1 year postoperatively. A Clinical Frailty Score ≥6 and the presence of dysphagia or COPD were significantly associated with 1-year mortality (p=0.034, 0.002). The survival of nonagenarians post-EVAR was comparable to an age- and sex-matched general Japanese population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EVAR in nonagenarians resulted in favorable short-term outcomes with no early or aneurysm-related deaths. Their long-term survival approximated that of the general population, suggesting EVAR may offer comparable prognostic benefit. However, in patients with severe frailty or comorbidities such as dysphagia or respiratory impairment, EVAR should be carefully considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Balancing risks and clinical outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair in Nonagenarians.\",\"authors\":\"Kayoko Natsume, Yasutaka Saito, Syunsuke Miyahara, Mitsuru Asano\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.07.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) is a viable option for elderly patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm. In extremely elderly individuals with inherently limited survival, this study aimed to evaluate EVAR outcomes in nonagenarians and identify factors associated with favorable survival to refine selection criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 144 patients who underwent elective EVAR between April 2013 and August 2023. Patients were divided into those aged <90 years (younger group, n=132) and ≥90 years (nonagenarian group, n=12). Primary outcomes included postoperative morbidity and mortality. Additionally, we explored potential risk factors for early mortality in the nonagenarian group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences between the groups in 30-day (p=0.840), aneurysm-related mortality (p=0.769), or postoperative morbidity (p=0.297). At 1 year, the survival rate was 67% in the nonagenarian group and 90% in the younger group (p=0.116). While this difference was not significant, the overall Kaplan-Meier survival curve demonstrated a significant divergence between the two groups (p=0.012). Four nonagenarians died within 1 year postoperatively. A Clinical Frailty Score ≥6 and the presence of dysphagia or COPD were significantly associated with 1-year mortality (p=0.034, 0.002). The survival of nonagenarians post-EVAR was comparable to an age- and sex-matched general Japanese population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EVAR in nonagenarians resulted in favorable short-term outcomes with no early or aneurysm-related deaths. Their long-term survival approximated that of the general population, suggesting EVAR may offer comparable prognostic benefit. However, in patients with severe frailty or comorbidities such as dysphagia or respiratory impairment, EVAR should be carefully considered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of vascular surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of vascular surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2025.07.020\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2025.07.020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:血管内主动脉修复术(EVAR)是老年腹主动脉瘤患者的一种可行选择。本研究旨在评估90岁以上高龄患者的EVAR结果,并确定与有利生存相关的因素,以完善选择标准。方法:我们回顾性分析了2013年4月至2023年8月期间接受选择性EVAR的144例患者。结果:两组间30天(p=0.840)、动脉瘤相关死亡率(p=0.769)、术后发病率(p=0.297)差异均无统计学意义。1年时,老年组生存率为67%,年轻组为90% (p=0.116)。虽然这种差异不显著,但总体Kaplan-Meier生存曲线显示两组之间存在显著差异(p=0.012)。4名90多岁老人术后1年内死亡。临床虚弱评分≥6、存在吞咽困难或COPD与1年死亡率显著相关(p=0.034, 0.002)。evar后的90多岁老人的生存率与年龄和性别匹配的日本普通人群相当。结论:90岁老人EVAR的短期预后良好,无早期或动脉瘤相关死亡。他们的长期生存率与一般人群接近,这表明EVAR可能提供类似的预后益处。然而,对于严重虚弱或伴有吞咽困难或呼吸障碍等合并症的患者,应仔细考虑EVAR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Balancing risks and clinical outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair in Nonagenarians.

Background: Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) is a viable option for elderly patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm. In extremely elderly individuals with inherently limited survival, this study aimed to evaluate EVAR outcomes in nonagenarians and identify factors associated with favorable survival to refine selection criteria.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 144 patients who underwent elective EVAR between April 2013 and August 2023. Patients were divided into those aged <90 years (younger group, n=132) and ≥90 years (nonagenarian group, n=12). Primary outcomes included postoperative morbidity and mortality. Additionally, we explored potential risk factors for early mortality in the nonagenarian group.

Results: There were no significant differences between the groups in 30-day (p=0.840), aneurysm-related mortality (p=0.769), or postoperative morbidity (p=0.297). At 1 year, the survival rate was 67% in the nonagenarian group and 90% in the younger group (p=0.116). While this difference was not significant, the overall Kaplan-Meier survival curve demonstrated a significant divergence between the two groups (p=0.012). Four nonagenarians died within 1 year postoperatively. A Clinical Frailty Score ≥6 and the presence of dysphagia or COPD were significantly associated with 1-year mortality (p=0.034, 0.002). The survival of nonagenarians post-EVAR was comparable to an age- and sex-matched general Japanese population.

Conclusions: EVAR in nonagenarians resulted in favorable short-term outcomes with no early or aneurysm-related deaths. Their long-term survival approximated that of the general population, suggesting EVAR may offer comparable prognostic benefit. However, in patients with severe frailty or comorbidities such as dysphagia or respiratory impairment, EVAR should be carefully considered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
603
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Vascular Surgery, published eight times a year, invites original manuscripts reporting clinical and experimental work in vascular surgery for peer review. Articles may be submitted for the following sections of the journal: Clinical Research (reports of clinical series, new drug or medical device trials) Basic Science Research (new investigations, experimental work) Case Reports (reports on a limited series of patients) General Reviews (scholarly review of the existing literature on a relevant topic) Developments in Endovascular and Endoscopic Surgery Selected Techniques (technical maneuvers) Historical Notes (interesting vignettes from the early days of vascular surgery) Editorials/Correspondence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信