在大型环境流行病学队列研究中减少空间混淆的半参数方法

IF 1.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Environmetrics Pub Date : 2025-07-26 DOI:10.1002/env.70028
Maddie J. Rainey, Kayleigh P. Keller
{"title":"在大型环境流行病学队列研究中减少空间混淆的半参数方法","authors":"Maddie J. Rainey,&nbsp;Kayleigh P. Keller","doi":"10.1002/env.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Epidemiological analyses of environmental risk factors often include spatially varying exposures and outcomes. Unmeasured, spatially varying factors can lead to confounding bias in estimates of associations with adverse health outcomes. Several approaches for mitigating this bias have been developed using semiparametric splines. These methods use thin plate regression splines to account for the spatial variation present in the analysis but differ in how to select the amount of spatial smoothing and in whether the exposure, the outcome, or both are smoothed. We directly compare current approaches based on information criteria and cross-validation metrics and additionally introduce a hybrid method to selection that combines features from multiple existing approaches. We compare these methods in a simulation study to make a recommendation for the best approach for different settings and demonstrate their use in a study of environmental exposures on birth weight in a Colorado cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":50512,"journal":{"name":"Environmetrics","volume":"36 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/env.70028","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Semiparametric Approaches for Mitigating Spatial Confounding in Large Environmental Epidemiology Cohort Studies\",\"authors\":\"Maddie J. Rainey,&nbsp;Kayleigh P. Keller\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/env.70028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Epidemiological analyses of environmental risk factors often include spatially varying exposures and outcomes. Unmeasured, spatially varying factors can lead to confounding bias in estimates of associations with adverse health outcomes. Several approaches for mitigating this bias have been developed using semiparametric splines. These methods use thin plate regression splines to account for the spatial variation present in the analysis but differ in how to select the amount of spatial smoothing and in whether the exposure, the outcome, or both are smoothed. We directly compare current approaches based on information criteria and cross-validation metrics and additionally introduce a hybrid method to selection that combines features from multiple existing approaches. We compare these methods in a simulation study to make a recommendation for the best approach for different settings and demonstrate their use in a study of environmental exposures on birth weight in a Colorado cohort.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmetrics\",\"volume\":\"36 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/env.70028\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/env.70028\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmetrics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/env.70028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

环境危险因素的流行病学分析通常包括空间变化的暴露和结果。未测量的、空间变化的因素可能导致与不良健康结果相关的估计存在混淆偏差。利用半参数样条已经开发了几种减轻这种偏差的方法。这些方法使用薄板回归样条来解释分析中存在的空间变化,但在如何选择空间平滑量以及是否对曝光、结果或两者进行平滑方面存在差异。我们直接比较了基于信息标准和交叉验证度量的当前方法,并引入了一种混合方法来结合多种现有方法的特征进行选择。我们在一项模拟研究中比较了这些方法,以推荐不同环境下的最佳方法,并在科罗拉多州队列中展示了它们在环境暴露对出生体重的研究中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Semiparametric Approaches for Mitigating Spatial Confounding in Large Environmental Epidemiology Cohort Studies

Semiparametric Approaches for Mitigating Spatial Confounding in Large Environmental Epidemiology Cohort Studies

Epidemiological analyses of environmental risk factors often include spatially varying exposures and outcomes. Unmeasured, spatially varying factors can lead to confounding bias in estimates of associations with adverse health outcomes. Several approaches for mitigating this bias have been developed using semiparametric splines. These methods use thin plate regression splines to account for the spatial variation present in the analysis but differ in how to select the amount of spatial smoothing and in whether the exposure, the outcome, or both are smoothed. We directly compare current approaches based on information criteria and cross-validation metrics and additionally introduce a hybrid method to selection that combines features from multiple existing approaches. We compare these methods in a simulation study to make a recommendation for the best approach for different settings and demonstrate their use in a study of environmental exposures on birth weight in a Colorado cohort.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmetrics
Environmetrics 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
17.60%
发文量
67
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Environmetrics, the official journal of The International Environmetrics Society (TIES), an Association of the International Statistical Institute, is devoted to the dissemination of high-quality quantitative research in the environmental sciences. The journal welcomes pertinent and innovative submissions from quantitative disciplines developing new statistical and mathematical techniques, methods, and theories that solve modern environmental problems. Articles must proffer substantive, new statistical or mathematical advances to answer important scientific questions in the environmental sciences, or must develop novel or enhanced statistical methodology with clear applications to environmental science. New methods should be illustrated with recent environmental data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信