{"title":"放射治疗拱顶中与内部铅板相关的不合规中子剂量","authors":"Eduardo Galiano, Camila Salata, Marcelo Godin","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>In high energy radiotherapy treatment vaults, photoneutrons can be produced by direct photon interactions with barrier materials and have a mean energy of approximately 20% of the nominal photon energy. Excess photoneutrons outside a treatment vault are always a concern due to their significant radiobiological efficacy, or Q value.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A pre-clinical regulatory inspection of a newly installed linear accelerator detected legally non-compliant photoneutron dose levels in a controlled area outside the treatment vault. The non-compliant dose was measured for a 10 MV photon beam external to the primary barrier improperly containing an internal 2.0 cm lead slab.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Based on measurements at a photon energy of 10 MV, using a workload <i>W</i> = 1500 Gy/week, a use factor of <i>U</i> = 1, and an occupancy factor of <i>T </i>= 0.5—which are NCRP-151 recommended values—an equivalent neutron weekly dose of 443 ± 38 µSv was calculated for a point in a controlled area external to the vault (point A in Figure 1). This results in a calculated annual neutron dose at this point of 22.1 ± 2.2 mSv, which exceeds the legal occupational annual limit of 20 mSv for a controlled area in our jurisdiction. The lead slab was removed. Neutron measurements taken subsequent to the removal of the slab detected values slightly above natural background.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The probable source of the non-compliant neutron dose outside the treatment vault was the presence of the lead slab.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70182","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-compliant neutron dose associated with an internal lead slab in a radiotherapy treatment vault\",\"authors\":\"Eduardo Galiano, Camila Salata, Marcelo Godin\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acm2.70182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>In high energy radiotherapy treatment vaults, photoneutrons can be produced by direct photon interactions with barrier materials and have a mean energy of approximately 20% of the nominal photon energy. Excess photoneutrons outside a treatment vault are always a concern due to their significant radiobiological efficacy, or Q value.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A pre-clinical regulatory inspection of a newly installed linear accelerator detected legally non-compliant photoneutron dose levels in a controlled area outside the treatment vault. The non-compliant dose was measured for a 10 MV photon beam external to the primary barrier improperly containing an internal 2.0 cm lead slab.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Based on measurements at a photon energy of 10 MV, using a workload <i>W</i> = 1500 Gy/week, a use factor of <i>U</i> = 1, and an occupancy factor of <i>T </i>= 0.5—which are NCRP-151 recommended values—an equivalent neutron weekly dose of 443 ± 38 µSv was calculated for a point in a controlled area external to the vault (point A in Figure 1). This results in a calculated annual neutron dose at this point of 22.1 ± 2.2 mSv, which exceeds the legal occupational annual limit of 20 mSv for a controlled area in our jurisdiction. The lead slab was removed. Neutron measurements taken subsequent to the removal of the slab detected values slightly above natural background.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The probable source of the non-compliant neutron dose outside the treatment vault was the presence of the lead slab.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"26 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70182\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70182\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70182","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Non-compliant neutron dose associated with an internal lead slab in a radiotherapy treatment vault
Background
In high energy radiotherapy treatment vaults, photoneutrons can be produced by direct photon interactions with barrier materials and have a mean energy of approximately 20% of the nominal photon energy. Excess photoneutrons outside a treatment vault are always a concern due to their significant radiobiological efficacy, or Q value.
Methods
A pre-clinical regulatory inspection of a newly installed linear accelerator detected legally non-compliant photoneutron dose levels in a controlled area outside the treatment vault. The non-compliant dose was measured for a 10 MV photon beam external to the primary barrier improperly containing an internal 2.0 cm lead slab.
Results
Based on measurements at a photon energy of 10 MV, using a workload W = 1500 Gy/week, a use factor of U = 1, and an occupancy factor of T = 0.5—which are NCRP-151 recommended values—an equivalent neutron weekly dose of 443 ± 38 µSv was calculated for a point in a controlled area external to the vault (point A in Figure 1). This results in a calculated annual neutron dose at this point of 22.1 ± 2.2 mSv, which exceeds the legal occupational annual limit of 20 mSv for a controlled area in our jurisdiction. The lead slab was removed. Neutron measurements taken subsequent to the removal of the slab detected values slightly above natural background.
Conclusions
The probable source of the non-compliant neutron dose outside the treatment vault was the presence of the lead slab.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic