理解环境决策:决策阶段与决策冲突之间的关系

IF 3.6
Letizia Richelli , Eline L.F.M.G. Vissers , Alessandra Gorini , Marijn H.C. Meijers , Eline S. Smit , Thomas Gültzow
{"title":"理解环境决策:决策阶段与决策冲突之间的关系","authors":"Letizia Richelli ,&nbsp;Eline L.F.M.G. Vissers ,&nbsp;Alessandra Gorini ,&nbsp;Marijn H.C. Meijers ,&nbsp;Eline S. Smit ,&nbsp;Thomas Gültzow","doi":"10.1016/j.joclim.2025.100467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Introduction: As research highlights how climate change impacts individual and planetary health, people might consider reducing their ecological footprint by acting pro-environmentally. However, their choice might depend on how far along they are in the process of deciding to act pro-environmentally (i.e., different stages of decision making) and on their experienced difficulty in deciding in favour of the environment and which behaviour to conduct (i.e., decisional conflict).</div><div>Methods: To explore in which stage participants find themselves (i.e., not yet thinking about choices, showing interest in doing so, actively considering options, approaching a decision, having already decided but remaining open to reconsideration, or being firmly committed to a decision with little chance of change) and whether their respective stages are correlated with their experienced decisional conflict, an online, cross-sectional questionnaire was distributed among a convenience sample of 418 English-, Dutch-, and Italian-speaking adults to measure participants’ demographics, stages, and extent to which they experience decisional conflict.</div><div>Results: Based on regression analyses, we observed that participants who were further along in the stages experienced less decisional conflict.</div><div>Conclusion: Therefore, we suggest that interventions (e.g., decision aids) take stages into account to better meet users’ needs and assist people in making environmental decisions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75054,"journal":{"name":"The journal of climate change and health","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 100467"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding environmental decision making: The association between stages of decision making and decisional conflict\",\"authors\":\"Letizia Richelli ,&nbsp;Eline L.F.M.G. Vissers ,&nbsp;Alessandra Gorini ,&nbsp;Marijn H.C. Meijers ,&nbsp;Eline S. Smit ,&nbsp;Thomas Gültzow\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joclim.2025.100467\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Introduction: As research highlights how climate change impacts individual and planetary health, people might consider reducing their ecological footprint by acting pro-environmentally. However, their choice might depend on how far along they are in the process of deciding to act pro-environmentally (i.e., different stages of decision making) and on their experienced difficulty in deciding in favour of the environment and which behaviour to conduct (i.e., decisional conflict).</div><div>Methods: To explore in which stage participants find themselves (i.e., not yet thinking about choices, showing interest in doing so, actively considering options, approaching a decision, having already decided but remaining open to reconsideration, or being firmly committed to a decision with little chance of change) and whether their respective stages are correlated with their experienced decisional conflict, an online, cross-sectional questionnaire was distributed among a convenience sample of 418 English-, Dutch-, and Italian-speaking adults to measure participants’ demographics, stages, and extent to which they experience decisional conflict.</div><div>Results: Based on regression analyses, we observed that participants who were further along in the stages experienced less decisional conflict.</div><div>Conclusion: Therefore, we suggest that interventions (e.g., decision aids) take stages into account to better meet users’ needs and assist people in making environmental decisions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of climate change and health\",\"volume\":\"24 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100467\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of climate change and health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667278225000501\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of climate change and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667278225000501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:由于研究强调了气候变化如何影响个人和地球健康,人们可能会考虑通过采取环保行动来减少他们的生态足迹。然而,他们的选择可能取决于他们在决定采取有利于环境的行动的过程中走了多远(即决策的不同阶段),以及他们在决定有利于环境和采取何种行为方面所经历的困难(即决策冲突)。方法:为了探索参与者发现自己处于哪个阶段(即尚未考虑选择,表现出兴趣,积极考虑选项,接近决定,已经决定但仍然可以重新考虑,或者坚定地致力于一个几乎没有改变机会的决定),以及他们各自的阶段是否与他们经历的决策冲突相关,在线,横断面调查问卷在418名讲英语、荷兰语和意大利语的成年人中分发,以衡量参与者的人口统计学特征、阶段和他们经历决策冲突的程度。结果:在回归分析的基础上,我们观察到,在阶段越深入的参与者经历的决策冲突越少。结论:因此,我们建议干预措施(例如决策辅助)考虑到阶段,以更好地满足用户需求并帮助人们做出环境决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding environmental decision making: The association between stages of decision making and decisional conflict
Introduction: As research highlights how climate change impacts individual and planetary health, people might consider reducing their ecological footprint by acting pro-environmentally. However, their choice might depend on how far along they are in the process of deciding to act pro-environmentally (i.e., different stages of decision making) and on their experienced difficulty in deciding in favour of the environment and which behaviour to conduct (i.e., decisional conflict).
Methods: To explore in which stage participants find themselves (i.e., not yet thinking about choices, showing interest in doing so, actively considering options, approaching a decision, having already decided but remaining open to reconsideration, or being firmly committed to a decision with little chance of change) and whether their respective stages are correlated with their experienced decisional conflict, an online, cross-sectional questionnaire was distributed among a convenience sample of 418 English-, Dutch-, and Italian-speaking adults to measure participants’ demographics, stages, and extent to which they experience decisional conflict.
Results: Based on regression analyses, we observed that participants who were further along in the stages experienced less decisional conflict.
Conclusion: Therefore, we suggest that interventions (e.g., decision aids) take stages into account to better meet users’ needs and assist people in making environmental decisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The journal of climate change and health
The journal of climate change and health Global and Planetary Change, Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
68 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信