Mariana Emília Santos , Sofia Ramiro , Désirée van der Heijde , Robert Landewé , Ana Rita Cruz-Machado , Carla Campinho Ferreira , Carlos Marques-Gomes , Catarina Dantas Soares , Cláudia Miguel , Fernando Albuquerque , Frederico Martins , Lígia Silva , Helena Santos , Inês Almeida , Miguel Bernardes , Nikita Khmelinskii , Paula Valente , Pedro Miguel Teixeira , Susana Emídio Matias , Vanessa Fraga , Alexandre Sepriano
{"title":"使用ASDAS评估轴型脊柱炎患者的疾病活动性和对治疗的反应:是否遵循了ASAS的建议?","authors":"Mariana Emília Santos , Sofia Ramiro , Désirée van der Heijde , Robert Landewé , Ana Rita Cruz-Machado , Carla Campinho Ferreira , Carlos Marques-Gomes , Catarina Dantas Soares , Cláudia Miguel , Fernando Albuquerque , Frederico Martins , Lígia Silva , Helena Santos , Inês Almeida , Miguel Bernardes , Nikita Khmelinskii , Paula Valente , Pedro Miguel Teixeira , Susana Emídio Matias , Vanessa Fraga , Alexandre Sepriano","doi":"10.1016/j.semarthrit.2025.152781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To determine the proportion of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) who had ASDAS calculated at baseline and at least once within two follow-up visits after starting their first bDMARD; and to evaluate the likelihood of meeting ASAS criteria for treatment continuation at 3 and 6 months.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with axSpA from the <em>Reuma.pt</em> registry who initiated their first bDMARD and attended baseline, 3-month (3 M), and 6-month (6 M) visits were included. Availability of ASDAS at baseline was cross-tabulated with its availability in ≥1 follow-up visit. When ASDAS was absent, the use of alternative outcome measures was evaluated. Treatment response (∆ASDAS ≥1.1) at 3 M and 6 M was analyzed across four response patterns: no response, 3 M only, 6 M only, or both.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 666 patients were included. Most had ASDAS at baseline (<em>N</em> = 540; 81 %), and 493 (74 %) also had ASDAS at 3 M and/or 6 M. No alternative outcome measure was predominantly used when ASDAS was absent. Among 336 patients with complete ASDAS evaluation, 58 % met ASAS continuation criteria at 3 M and 60 % at 6 M, with 86 % of response maintenance between 3 M and 6 M. Additionally, 25 % of 147 non-responders at 3 M responded at 6 M. Responders at both timepoints were more often male (65 % vs 45 %) and younger (mean age 35 vs 38 years).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ASDAS is widely assessed in axSpA patients starting bDMARDs by Portuguese rheumatologists. Most patients respond within 3 months but waiting until 6 months to determine treatment continuation is reasonable.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21715,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 152781"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The use of ASDAS to evaluate disease activity and response to treatment in patients with axial spondyloarthritis starting the first biological drug: Are ASAS recommendations being followed?\",\"authors\":\"Mariana Emília Santos , Sofia Ramiro , Désirée van der Heijde , Robert Landewé , Ana Rita Cruz-Machado , Carla Campinho Ferreira , Carlos Marques-Gomes , Catarina Dantas Soares , Cláudia Miguel , Fernando Albuquerque , Frederico Martins , Lígia Silva , Helena Santos , Inês Almeida , Miguel Bernardes , Nikita Khmelinskii , Paula Valente , Pedro Miguel Teixeira , Susana Emídio Matias , Vanessa Fraga , Alexandre Sepriano\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.semarthrit.2025.152781\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To determine the proportion of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) who had ASDAS calculated at baseline and at least once within two follow-up visits after starting their first bDMARD; and to evaluate the likelihood of meeting ASAS criteria for treatment continuation at 3 and 6 months.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with axSpA from the <em>Reuma.pt</em> registry who initiated their first bDMARD and attended baseline, 3-month (3 M), and 6-month (6 M) visits were included. Availability of ASDAS at baseline was cross-tabulated with its availability in ≥1 follow-up visit. When ASDAS was absent, the use of alternative outcome measures was evaluated. Treatment response (∆ASDAS ≥1.1) at 3 M and 6 M was analyzed across four response patterns: no response, 3 M only, 6 M only, or both.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 666 patients were included. Most had ASDAS at baseline (<em>N</em> = 540; 81 %), and 493 (74 %) also had ASDAS at 3 M and/or 6 M. No alternative outcome measure was predominantly used when ASDAS was absent. Among 336 patients with complete ASDAS evaluation, 58 % met ASAS continuation criteria at 3 M and 60 % at 6 M, with 86 % of response maintenance between 3 M and 6 M. Additionally, 25 % of 147 non-responders at 3 M responded at 6 M. Responders at both timepoints were more often male (65 % vs 45 %) and younger (mean age 35 vs 38 years).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ASDAS is widely assessed in axSpA patients starting bDMARDs by Portuguese rheumatologists. Most patients respond within 3 months but waiting until 6 months to determine treatment continuation is reasonable.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism\",\"volume\":\"74 \",\"pages\":\"Article 152781\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049017225001520\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049017225001520","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The use of ASDAS to evaluate disease activity and response to treatment in patients with axial spondyloarthritis starting the first biological drug: Are ASAS recommendations being followed?
Objectives
To determine the proportion of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) who had ASDAS calculated at baseline and at least once within two follow-up visits after starting their first bDMARD; and to evaluate the likelihood of meeting ASAS criteria for treatment continuation at 3 and 6 months.
Methods
Patients with axSpA from the Reuma.pt registry who initiated their first bDMARD and attended baseline, 3-month (3 M), and 6-month (6 M) visits were included. Availability of ASDAS at baseline was cross-tabulated with its availability in ≥1 follow-up visit. When ASDAS was absent, the use of alternative outcome measures was evaluated. Treatment response (∆ASDAS ≥1.1) at 3 M and 6 M was analyzed across four response patterns: no response, 3 M only, 6 M only, or both.
Results
A total of 666 patients were included. Most had ASDAS at baseline (N = 540; 81 %), and 493 (74 %) also had ASDAS at 3 M and/or 6 M. No alternative outcome measure was predominantly used when ASDAS was absent. Among 336 patients with complete ASDAS evaluation, 58 % met ASAS continuation criteria at 3 M and 60 % at 6 M, with 86 % of response maintenance between 3 M and 6 M. Additionally, 25 % of 147 non-responders at 3 M responded at 6 M. Responders at both timepoints were more often male (65 % vs 45 %) and younger (mean age 35 vs 38 years).
Conclusion
ASDAS is widely assessed in axSpA patients starting bDMARDs by Portuguese rheumatologists. Most patients respond within 3 months but waiting until 6 months to determine treatment continuation is reasonable.
期刊介绍:
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism provides access to the highest-quality clinical, therapeutic and translational research about arthritis, rheumatology and musculoskeletal disorders that affect the joints and connective tissue. Each bimonthly issue includes articles giving you the latest diagnostic criteria, consensus statements, systematic reviews and meta-analyses as well as clinical and translational research studies. Read this journal for the latest groundbreaking research and to gain insights from scientists and clinicians on the management and treatment of musculoskeletal and autoimmune rheumatologic diseases. The journal is of interest to rheumatologists, orthopedic surgeons, internal medicine physicians, immunologists and specialists in bone and mineral metabolism.