{"title":"小腿的新物体反应是否存在侧偏效应?","authors":"Chenyu Zhang , Molly Kindell , Rebecca K. Meagher","doi":"10.1016/j.applanim.2025.106757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Many animals exhibit preferential viewing of fear-inducing stimuli with their left eyes, reflecting cerebral lateralisation in emotion processing. In novel object tests, often used to assess fear, spatial positioning of the objects relative to the animal can vary. This study aimed to investigate visual lateralisation in calves’ responses in novel object tests, evaluate its effectiveness as an indicator of fear, and examine how initial monocular presentation of fear-inducing stimuli impacts fear responses and their reliability. Thirty-six dairy calves underwent a novel object test at six weeks of age and a second at seven weeks of age using a different object, with behavioural responses towards the novel objects recorded. There was no correlation in latency to first contact with novel objects between tests. On average, proportion of time viewing novel objects with the left eye did not significantly differ from the right eye across the two tests, nor did it correlate with latency to first contact with novel objects. The probability of contact with novel objects and latency to first contact with novel objects did not differ based on initial eye with which novel objects were seen, although among calves that showed an avoidance response, they were less likely to have used the right eye for viewing than either the left eye or both eyes just before the locomotor response. Overall, fear responses in calves during repeated novel object tests were inconsistent, and this inconsistency was not clearly attributable to the random presentation of objects to different visual fields. This may suggest either a lack of cerebral lateralisation in fear processing at this age or that alternative methods may be needed to more accurately assess it.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8222,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","volume":"292 ","pages":"Article 106757"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are laterality effects present in novel object responses of calves?\",\"authors\":\"Chenyu Zhang , Molly Kindell , Rebecca K. Meagher\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.applanim.2025.106757\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Many animals exhibit preferential viewing of fear-inducing stimuli with their left eyes, reflecting cerebral lateralisation in emotion processing. In novel object tests, often used to assess fear, spatial positioning of the objects relative to the animal can vary. This study aimed to investigate visual lateralisation in calves’ responses in novel object tests, evaluate its effectiveness as an indicator of fear, and examine how initial monocular presentation of fear-inducing stimuli impacts fear responses and their reliability. Thirty-six dairy calves underwent a novel object test at six weeks of age and a second at seven weeks of age using a different object, with behavioural responses towards the novel objects recorded. There was no correlation in latency to first contact with novel objects between tests. On average, proportion of time viewing novel objects with the left eye did not significantly differ from the right eye across the two tests, nor did it correlate with latency to first contact with novel objects. The probability of contact with novel objects and latency to first contact with novel objects did not differ based on initial eye with which novel objects were seen, although among calves that showed an avoidance response, they were less likely to have used the right eye for viewing than either the left eye or both eyes just before the locomotor response. Overall, fear responses in calves during repeated novel object tests were inconsistent, and this inconsistency was not clearly attributable to the random presentation of objects to different visual fields. This may suggest either a lack of cerebral lateralisation in fear processing at this age or that alternative methods may be needed to more accurately assess it.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Animal Behaviour Science\",\"volume\":\"292 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106757\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Animal Behaviour Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159125002552\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159125002552","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Are laterality effects present in novel object responses of calves?
Many animals exhibit preferential viewing of fear-inducing stimuli with their left eyes, reflecting cerebral lateralisation in emotion processing. In novel object tests, often used to assess fear, spatial positioning of the objects relative to the animal can vary. This study aimed to investigate visual lateralisation in calves’ responses in novel object tests, evaluate its effectiveness as an indicator of fear, and examine how initial monocular presentation of fear-inducing stimuli impacts fear responses and their reliability. Thirty-six dairy calves underwent a novel object test at six weeks of age and a second at seven weeks of age using a different object, with behavioural responses towards the novel objects recorded. There was no correlation in latency to first contact with novel objects between tests. On average, proportion of time viewing novel objects with the left eye did not significantly differ from the right eye across the two tests, nor did it correlate with latency to first contact with novel objects. The probability of contact with novel objects and latency to first contact with novel objects did not differ based on initial eye with which novel objects were seen, although among calves that showed an avoidance response, they were less likely to have used the right eye for viewing than either the left eye or both eyes just before the locomotor response. Overall, fear responses in calves during repeated novel object tests were inconsistent, and this inconsistency was not clearly attributable to the random presentation of objects to different visual fields. This may suggest either a lack of cerebral lateralisation in fear processing at this age or that alternative methods may be needed to more accurately assess it.
期刊介绍:
This journal publishes relevant information on the behaviour of domesticated and utilized animals.
Topics covered include:
-Behaviour of farm, zoo and laboratory animals in relation to animal management and welfare
-Behaviour of companion animals in relation to behavioural problems, for example, in relation to the training of dogs for different purposes, in relation to behavioural problems
-Studies of the behaviour of wild animals when these studies are relevant from an applied perspective, for example in relation to wildlife management, pest management or nature conservation
-Methodological studies within relevant fields
The principal subjects are farm, companion and laboratory animals, including, of course, poultry. The journal also deals with the following animal subjects:
-Those involved in any farming system, e.g. deer, rabbits and fur-bearing animals
-Those in ANY form of confinement, e.g. zoos, safari parks and other forms of display
-Feral animals, and any animal species which impinge on farming operations, e.g. as causes of loss or damage
-Species used for hunting, recreation etc. may also be considered as acceptable subjects in some instances
-Laboratory animals, if the material relates to their behavioural requirements