男人吃饭吗?英国传统男性规范与动物产品消费的混合方法研究

IF 7 1区 心理学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Elise Hankins , Abby Couture , Charlotte Flores , Nicholas Poh-Jie Tan , Annayah M.B. Prosser
{"title":"男人吃饭吗?英国传统男性规范与动物产品消费的混合方法研究","authors":"Elise Hankins ,&nbsp;Abby Couture ,&nbsp;Charlotte Flores ,&nbsp;Nicholas Poh-Jie Tan ,&nbsp;Annayah M.B. Prosser","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Animal agriculture is a major source of carbon emissions, biodiversity decline and deforestation globally. Reducing meat and dairy consumption is one of the most impactful ways that individuals can reduce their carbon emissions. However, while vegetarianism and veganism are becoming increasingly common globally, men still consume more meat than women and demonstrate greater resistance to meat reduction interventions. Understanding why this population is reluctant to reduce their meat consumption is of great importance for global climate policy, environmental psychologists and animal advocates. In this paper, we explore the nuances of meat consumption among men using a mixed-methods approach in two studies. In the first study, we used a representative quantitative survey of over 1000 men to understand how masculine roles and norms impact meat consumption. We found that greater alignment with traditional masculine norms was significantly associated with greater red meat and poultry consumption, as well as greater attachment to meat and dairy, a stronger perception that meat is masculine, and a higher sense of threat from vegetarians. Particularly, the norms “avoidance of femininity” and “achievement status” may be uniquely driving this connection. In the second study, we used a novel qualitative method (remotely-moderated focus groups), to explore how men discuss meat consumption with matched age and gender peer groups. Thematic analysis indicated that men have a mixed, and oftentimes contradictory understanding of the role of their gender in food choices. While some men denied that gender influenced their meat consumption, they would then discuss the gendered dynamics of social eating and use multiple strategies to justify their meat consumption. In tandem, these studies highlight the relevance of masculine norms in the context of animal product consumption and reduction, even when the relationship is largely covert or implicit. Based on these findings, we propose six recommendations for future interventions designed to encourage meat and dairy reduction in men.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 102693"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Macho meals? A mixed methods study on traditional masculine norms and animal product consumption in the UK\",\"authors\":\"Elise Hankins ,&nbsp;Abby Couture ,&nbsp;Charlotte Flores ,&nbsp;Nicholas Poh-Jie Tan ,&nbsp;Annayah M.B. Prosser\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102693\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Animal agriculture is a major source of carbon emissions, biodiversity decline and deforestation globally. Reducing meat and dairy consumption is one of the most impactful ways that individuals can reduce their carbon emissions. However, while vegetarianism and veganism are becoming increasingly common globally, men still consume more meat than women and demonstrate greater resistance to meat reduction interventions. Understanding why this population is reluctant to reduce their meat consumption is of great importance for global climate policy, environmental psychologists and animal advocates. In this paper, we explore the nuances of meat consumption among men using a mixed-methods approach in two studies. In the first study, we used a representative quantitative survey of over 1000 men to understand how masculine roles and norms impact meat consumption. We found that greater alignment with traditional masculine norms was significantly associated with greater red meat and poultry consumption, as well as greater attachment to meat and dairy, a stronger perception that meat is masculine, and a higher sense of threat from vegetarians. Particularly, the norms “avoidance of femininity” and “achievement status” may be uniquely driving this connection. In the second study, we used a novel qualitative method (remotely-moderated focus groups), to explore how men discuss meat consumption with matched age and gender peer groups. Thematic analysis indicated that men have a mixed, and oftentimes contradictory understanding of the role of their gender in food choices. While some men denied that gender influenced their meat consumption, they would then discuss the gendered dynamics of social eating and use multiple strategies to justify their meat consumption. In tandem, these studies highlight the relevance of masculine norms in the context of animal product consumption and reduction, even when the relationship is largely covert or implicit. Based on these findings, we propose six recommendations for future interventions designed to encourage meat and dairy reduction in men.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"volume\":\"106 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102693\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425001768\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425001768","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

畜牧业是全球碳排放、生物多样性下降和森林砍伐的主要来源。减少肉类和奶制品的消费是个人减少碳排放的最有效的方法之一。然而,尽管素食主义和纯素食主义在全球变得越来越普遍,但男性仍然比女性消费更多的肉类,并且对减少肉类干预表现出更大的阻力。了解为什么这个群体不愿意减少他们的肉类消费,对于全球气候政策、环境心理学家和动物倡导者来说非常重要。在这篇论文中,我们在两项研究中使用混合方法探讨了男性肉类消费的细微差别。在第一项研究中,我们对1000多名男性进行了有代表性的定量调查,以了解男性角色和规范如何影响肉类消费。我们发现,与传统男性规范更一致的人,红肉和家禽的消费量也会增加,对肉类和乳制品的依恋程度也会增加,对肉类的男性化认识也会更强,对素食者的威胁感也会更高。特别是,“避免女性气质”和“成就地位”的规范可能是推动这种联系的唯一因素。在第二项研究中,我们使用了一种新颖的定性方法(远程调节焦点小组),探讨男性如何与年龄和性别相匹配的同龄人讨论肉类消费。专题分析表明,男性对自己的性别在食物选择中的作用的理解是混合的,而且往往是相互矛盾的。虽然一些男性否认性别影响他们的肉类消费,但他们随后会讨论社会饮食的性别动态,并使用多种策略来证明他们的肉类消费是合理的。同时,这些研究强调了男性规范在动物产品消费和减少的背景下的相关性,即使这种关系在很大程度上是隐蔽或隐含的。基于这些发现,我们提出了六项建议,旨在鼓励男性减少肉类和乳制品的摄入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Macho meals? A mixed methods study on traditional masculine norms and animal product consumption in the UK
Animal agriculture is a major source of carbon emissions, biodiversity decline and deforestation globally. Reducing meat and dairy consumption is one of the most impactful ways that individuals can reduce their carbon emissions. However, while vegetarianism and veganism are becoming increasingly common globally, men still consume more meat than women and demonstrate greater resistance to meat reduction interventions. Understanding why this population is reluctant to reduce their meat consumption is of great importance for global climate policy, environmental psychologists and animal advocates. In this paper, we explore the nuances of meat consumption among men using a mixed-methods approach in two studies. In the first study, we used a representative quantitative survey of over 1000 men to understand how masculine roles and norms impact meat consumption. We found that greater alignment with traditional masculine norms was significantly associated with greater red meat and poultry consumption, as well as greater attachment to meat and dairy, a stronger perception that meat is masculine, and a higher sense of threat from vegetarians. Particularly, the norms “avoidance of femininity” and “achievement status” may be uniquely driving this connection. In the second study, we used a novel qualitative method (remotely-moderated focus groups), to explore how men discuss meat consumption with matched age and gender peer groups. Thematic analysis indicated that men have a mixed, and oftentimes contradictory understanding of the role of their gender in food choices. While some men denied that gender influenced their meat consumption, they would then discuss the gendered dynamics of social eating and use multiple strategies to justify their meat consumption. In tandem, these studies highlight the relevance of masculine norms in the context of animal product consumption and reduction, even when the relationship is largely covert or implicit. Based on these findings, we propose six recommendations for future interventions designed to encourage meat and dairy reduction in men.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
140
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信