黑人和白人婴儿肺成熟差异的比较:一项范围综述。

IF 1.6
Desi Michele Newberry, Nicole Brady, Nikki Briskin, Brittany Graham, Hannah Leonard, Leila Ledbetter, Tracey Robertson Bell
{"title":"黑人和白人婴儿肺成熟差异的比较:一项范围综述。","authors":"Desi Michele Newberry, Nicole Brady, Nikki Briskin, Brittany Graham, Hannah Leonard, Leila Ledbetter, Tracey Robertson Bell","doi":"10.1097/ANC.0000000000001275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bias exists that infants of color have better outcomes in the neonatal intensive care unit compared to White infants. These presumptions stem from perceived differences in pulmonary maturation between Black and White infants.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the incidence of respiratory morbidity in Black and White infants, and to identify if pulmonary maturation differences exist.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Databases included MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), and Web of Science (Clarivate).</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>All identified studies were uploaded into Covidence. A total of 2124 citations were screened in the abstract phase. Study selection was carried out independently by 2 authors and excluded if did not meet inclusion criteria. Disagreements were resolved by adjudication by third reviewer. Article selection presented by flowchart as per PRISMA guidelines.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>A citation tracking system was used to identify relevant studies included in the full text review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Though differences among Black and White infants were present, it was not found that race alone had a causal impact on an infant's pulmonary maturation, but rather that these differences in outcomes could be related to health disparities impacted by race.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice and research: </strong>As providers driving care and making treatment decisions for neonatal patients, we must be aware of our implicit biases regarding neonatal lung development. Additional research is essential to drive policy change and ensure equitable healthcare and reduce infant mortality and morbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":520547,"journal":{"name":"Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses","volume":" ","pages":"329-336"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Pulmonary Maturation Differences Among Black and White Infants: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Desi Michele Newberry, Nicole Brady, Nikki Briskin, Brittany Graham, Hannah Leonard, Leila Ledbetter, Tracey Robertson Bell\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ANC.0000000000001275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bias exists that infants of color have better outcomes in the neonatal intensive care unit compared to White infants. These presumptions stem from perceived differences in pulmonary maturation between Black and White infants.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the incidence of respiratory morbidity in Black and White infants, and to identify if pulmonary maturation differences exist.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Databases included MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), and Web of Science (Clarivate).</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>All identified studies were uploaded into Covidence. A total of 2124 citations were screened in the abstract phase. Study selection was carried out independently by 2 authors and excluded if did not meet inclusion criteria. Disagreements were resolved by adjudication by third reviewer. Article selection presented by flowchart as per PRISMA guidelines.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>A citation tracking system was used to identify relevant studies included in the full text review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Though differences among Black and White infants were present, it was not found that race alone had a causal impact on an infant's pulmonary maturation, but rather that these differences in outcomes could be related to health disparities impacted by race.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice and research: </strong>As providers driving care and making treatment decisions for neonatal patients, we must be aware of our implicit biases regarding neonatal lung development. Additional research is essential to drive policy change and ensure equitable healthcare and reduce infant mortality and morbidity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"329-336\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANC.0000000000001275\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANC.0000000000001275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:与白人婴儿相比,有色人种婴儿在新生儿重症监护病房有更好的预后存在偏见。这些假设源于黑人和白人婴儿在肺成熟方面的差异。目的:比较黑人和白人婴儿呼吸道疾病的发病率,并确定肺成熟是否存在差异。数据来源:数据库包括MEDLINE (Ovid)、Embase(爱思唯尔)和Web of Science (Clarivate)。研究选择:所有确定的研究都已上传到covid。摘要阶段共筛选了2124篇文献。研究选择由2位作者独立进行,如果不符合纳入标准则排除。分歧由第三审稿人裁决解决。根据PRISMA指南,用流程图展示文章选择。数据提取:使用引文跟踪系统识别全文综述中包含的相关研究。结果:虽然黑人和白人婴儿之间存在差异,但没有发现种族本身对婴儿肺成熟有因果影响,而是这些结果的差异可能与种族影响的健康差异有关。对实践和研究的启示:作为为新生儿患者提供护理和做出治疗决定的提供者,我们必须意识到我们对新生儿肺部发育的隐性偏见。进一步的研究对于推动政策变革和确保公平的医疗保健以及降低婴儿死亡率和发病率至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Pulmonary Maturation Differences Among Black and White Infants: A Scoping Review.

Background: Bias exists that infants of color have better outcomes in the neonatal intensive care unit compared to White infants. These presumptions stem from perceived differences in pulmonary maturation between Black and White infants.

Purpose: To compare the incidence of respiratory morbidity in Black and White infants, and to identify if pulmonary maturation differences exist.

Data sources: Databases included MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), and Web of Science (Clarivate).

Study selection: All identified studies were uploaded into Covidence. A total of 2124 citations were screened in the abstract phase. Study selection was carried out independently by 2 authors and excluded if did not meet inclusion criteria. Disagreements were resolved by adjudication by third reviewer. Article selection presented by flowchart as per PRISMA guidelines.

Data extraction: A citation tracking system was used to identify relevant studies included in the full text review.

Results: Though differences among Black and White infants were present, it was not found that race alone had a causal impact on an infant's pulmonary maturation, but rather that these differences in outcomes could be related to health disparities impacted by race.

Implications for practice and research: As providers driving care and making treatment decisions for neonatal patients, we must be aware of our implicit biases regarding neonatal lung development. Additional research is essential to drive policy change and ensure equitable healthcare and reduce infant mortality and morbidity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信