评估供指在交叉指瓣手术中的发病率:一项全面的纵向研究。

IF 0.5 Q4 SURGERY
N C Madhusudhan, Bharath Kadadi, Niranjan Mallanaik
{"title":"评估供指在交叉指瓣手术中的发病率:一项全面的纵向研究。","authors":"N C Madhusudhan, Bharath Kadadi, Niranjan Mallanaik","doi":"10.1142/S2424835525500547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The cross-finger flap is a reliable technique for soft tissue reconstruction in finger injuries, providing pliable tissue and anatomical security. However, donor finger morbidity remains a concern. This retrospective cohort study evaluated donor-site outcomes, focussing on functional recovery and patient-reported measures. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective cohort study included 30 patients who underwent cross-finger flap surgery, predominantly males (80%) aged 21-40 years, mostly manual labourers with workplace-related injuries. The index finger was most injured (48%), while the middle finger served as the primary donor (66.6%). Assessments included donor finger pain, total active motion (TAM), pinch strength, aesthetic outcomes and complications. Statistical analysis compared donor and control fingers to evaluate functional recovery and patient satisfaction. <b>Results:</b> Patient satisfaction was high (96.7%), with minimal donor site pain (93%). A significant reduction in TAM was observed in donor fingers compared to controls (<i>p</i> = 0.029). Maximal pinch strength showed no significant difference (<i>p</i> = 0.415). Complications included hyperpigmentation (20%) and partial graft loss (10%) and hypertrophic scar (3%). <b>Conclusion:</b> The cross-finger flap remains an effective reconstructive option with high patient satisfaction. However, donor finger morbidity, particularly reduced TAM, underscores the need for structured postoperative rehabilitation. Early flap division and supervised physiotherapy may optimise functional recovery. Study limitations include sample size, but these findings demonstrate the procedure's viability for soft tissue reconstruction. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level IV (Therapeutic).</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":" ","pages":"408-415"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Donor Finger Morbidity in Cross-Finger Flap Surgery: A Comprehensive Longitudinal Study.\",\"authors\":\"N C Madhusudhan, Bharath Kadadi, Niranjan Mallanaik\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/S2424835525500547\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The cross-finger flap is a reliable technique for soft tissue reconstruction in finger injuries, providing pliable tissue and anatomical security. However, donor finger morbidity remains a concern. This retrospective cohort study evaluated donor-site outcomes, focussing on functional recovery and patient-reported measures. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective cohort study included 30 patients who underwent cross-finger flap surgery, predominantly males (80%) aged 21-40 years, mostly manual labourers with workplace-related injuries. The index finger was most injured (48%), while the middle finger served as the primary donor (66.6%). Assessments included donor finger pain, total active motion (TAM), pinch strength, aesthetic outcomes and complications. Statistical analysis compared donor and control fingers to evaluate functional recovery and patient satisfaction. <b>Results:</b> Patient satisfaction was high (96.7%), with minimal donor site pain (93%). A significant reduction in TAM was observed in donor fingers compared to controls (<i>p</i> = 0.029). Maximal pinch strength showed no significant difference (<i>p</i> = 0.415). Complications included hyperpigmentation (20%) and partial graft loss (10%) and hypertrophic scar (3%). <b>Conclusion:</b> The cross-finger flap remains an effective reconstructive option with high patient satisfaction. However, donor finger morbidity, particularly reduced TAM, underscores the need for structured postoperative rehabilitation. Early flap division and supervised physiotherapy may optimise functional recovery. Study limitations include sample size, but these findings demonstrate the procedure's viability for soft tissue reconstruction. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level IV (Therapeutic).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"408-415\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835525500547\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835525500547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:交叉指瓣是一种可靠的手指损伤软组织重建技术,提供了柔软的组织和解剖安全。然而,供体手指的发病率仍然是一个问题。这项回顾性队列研究评估了供体部位的结果,重点是功能恢复和患者报告的措施。方法:本回顾性队列研究包括30例接受交叉指瓣手术的患者,主要是男性(80%),年龄21-40岁,主要是工作场所相关损伤的体力劳动者。食指损伤最多(48%),中指为主要供体(66.6%)。评估包括供指疼痛,总主动运动(TAM),捏力,美学结果和并发症。统计分析比较供体手指和对照手指功能恢复和患者满意度。结果:患者满意度高(96.7%),供区疼痛最小(93%)。与对照组相比,供体手指的TAM显著减少(p = 0.029)。最大夹紧强度差异无统计学意义(p = 0.415)。并发症包括色素沉着(20%)、部分移植物丢失(10%)和增生性疤痕(3%)。结论:交叉指瓣是一种有效的修复方法,患者满意度高。然而,供指的发病率,特别是TAM的减少,强调了有组织的术后康复的必要性。早期皮瓣分割和监督物理治疗可优化功能恢复。研究的局限性包括样本量,但这些发现证明了该方法在软组织重建中的可行性。证据等级:IV级(治疗性)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing Donor Finger Morbidity in Cross-Finger Flap Surgery: A Comprehensive Longitudinal Study.

Background: The cross-finger flap is a reliable technique for soft tissue reconstruction in finger injuries, providing pliable tissue and anatomical security. However, donor finger morbidity remains a concern. This retrospective cohort study evaluated donor-site outcomes, focussing on functional recovery and patient-reported measures. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 30 patients who underwent cross-finger flap surgery, predominantly males (80%) aged 21-40 years, mostly manual labourers with workplace-related injuries. The index finger was most injured (48%), while the middle finger served as the primary donor (66.6%). Assessments included donor finger pain, total active motion (TAM), pinch strength, aesthetic outcomes and complications. Statistical analysis compared donor and control fingers to evaluate functional recovery and patient satisfaction. Results: Patient satisfaction was high (96.7%), with minimal donor site pain (93%). A significant reduction in TAM was observed in donor fingers compared to controls (p = 0.029). Maximal pinch strength showed no significant difference (p = 0.415). Complications included hyperpigmentation (20%) and partial graft loss (10%) and hypertrophic scar (3%). Conclusion: The cross-finger flap remains an effective reconstructive option with high patient satisfaction. However, donor finger morbidity, particularly reduced TAM, underscores the need for structured postoperative rehabilitation. Early flap division and supervised physiotherapy may optimise functional recovery. Study limitations include sample size, but these findings demonstrate the procedure's viability for soft tissue reconstruction. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
304
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信