强化多学科喂养干预中快速拔管的可接受性和可行性。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Valerie M Volkert, Rashelle Berry, Heather Farling, Caitlin Waddle, Emily Malugen, Sandhya Rajagopal, Laura M Johnson, Scott Gillespie, Derianne Buckley, Meara McMahon, Lawrence Scahill, William G Sharp
{"title":"强化多学科喂养干预中快速拔管的可接受性和可行性。","authors":"Valerie M Volkert, Rashelle Berry, Heather Farling, Caitlin Waddle, Emily Malugen, Sandhya Rajagopal, Laura M Johnson, Scott Gillespie, Derianne Buckley, Meara McMahon, Lawrence Scahill, William G Sharp","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000001392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objective of this pilot trial was to determine to what extent hunger provocation, via rapid weaning from enteral feedings, was acceptable and feasible and to evaluate the effect of this intervention when used during intensive multidisciplinary feeding intervention for children dependent on enteral feedings.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study was conducted at an Intensive Multidisciplinary Program located in the Southeastern United States from May 2021 to October 2023. Children were randomly assigned 1:1 to standard wean or rapid wean using permuted blocks of 2 and 4 with allocation pattern concealed to investigators resulting in respective cohort sizes of 8 (N = 16 participants, total) for 8 weeks. Feasibility benchmarks and data completeness were summarized using percentages and means. The study also evaluated the effect of intervention on treatment outcomes including weight-for-age z-score, percentage of daily caloric needs met by mouth, percent of patients achieving ≥1 day where 100% of caloric needs were met via oral feeding, and time to effect.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Feasibility and acceptability benchmarks were achieved. Preliminary outcome data suggest rapid tube weaning did not influence reaching 100% oral intake or fully weaning from a feeding tube when used as an adjunct to behavioral intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study was a prerequisite to support a future efficacy randomized clinical trial to further study how to optimize outcomes to achieve full weaning from tube feeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":50215,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acceptability and Feasibility of Rapid Tube Weaning During Intensive Multidisciplinary Feeding Intervention.\",\"authors\":\"Valerie M Volkert, Rashelle Berry, Heather Farling, Caitlin Waddle, Emily Malugen, Sandhya Rajagopal, Laura M Johnson, Scott Gillespie, Derianne Buckley, Meara McMahon, Lawrence Scahill, William G Sharp\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/DBP.0000000000001392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objective of this pilot trial was to determine to what extent hunger provocation, via rapid weaning from enteral feedings, was acceptable and feasible and to evaluate the effect of this intervention when used during intensive multidisciplinary feeding intervention for children dependent on enteral feedings.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study was conducted at an Intensive Multidisciplinary Program located in the Southeastern United States from May 2021 to October 2023. Children were randomly assigned 1:1 to standard wean or rapid wean using permuted blocks of 2 and 4 with allocation pattern concealed to investigators resulting in respective cohort sizes of 8 (N = 16 participants, total) for 8 weeks. Feasibility benchmarks and data completeness were summarized using percentages and means. The study also evaluated the effect of intervention on treatment outcomes including weight-for-age z-score, percentage of daily caloric needs met by mouth, percent of patients achieving ≥1 day where 100% of caloric needs were met via oral feeding, and time to effect.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Feasibility and acceptability benchmarks were achieved. Preliminary outcome data suggest rapid tube weaning did not influence reaching 100% oral intake or fully weaning from a feeding tube when used as an adjunct to behavioral intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study was a prerequisite to support a future efficacy randomized clinical trial to further study how to optimize outcomes to achieve full weaning from tube feeding.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000001392\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000001392","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本试点试验的主要目的是确定通过快速断奶进行肠内喂养的饥饿刺激在多大程度上是可接受和可行的,并评估该干预措施在对依赖肠内喂养的儿童进行强化多学科喂养干预时的效果。方法:该研究于2021年5月至2023年10月在美国东南部的一个强化多学科项目中进行。儿童按1:1的比例随机分配到标准断奶或快速断奶,使用2和4的排列块,分配模式对研究人员隐藏,导致各自的队列规模为8 (N = 16名参与者,总共),持续8周。采用百分比和均值对可行性基准和数据完整性进行总结。该研究还评估了干预对治疗结果的影响,包括年龄体重z-score、每日口服满足热量需求的百分比、通过口服喂养满足100%热量需求≥1天的患者百分比,以及产生效果的时间。结果:达到了可行性和可接受性的基准。初步结果数据显示,当作为行为干预的辅助手段时,快速脱管不影响达到100%口服摄入量或完全脱管。结论:本研究是支持未来疗效随机临床试验的先决条件,该试验将进一步研究如何优化结果以实现管饲的完全断奶。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acceptability and Feasibility of Rapid Tube Weaning During Intensive Multidisciplinary Feeding Intervention.

Objective: The primary objective of this pilot trial was to determine to what extent hunger provocation, via rapid weaning from enteral feedings, was acceptable and feasible and to evaluate the effect of this intervention when used during intensive multidisciplinary feeding intervention for children dependent on enteral feedings.

Method: The study was conducted at an Intensive Multidisciplinary Program located in the Southeastern United States from May 2021 to October 2023. Children were randomly assigned 1:1 to standard wean or rapid wean using permuted blocks of 2 and 4 with allocation pattern concealed to investigators resulting in respective cohort sizes of 8 (N = 16 participants, total) for 8 weeks. Feasibility benchmarks and data completeness were summarized using percentages and means. The study also evaluated the effect of intervention on treatment outcomes including weight-for-age z-score, percentage of daily caloric needs met by mouth, percent of patients achieving ≥1 day where 100% of caloric needs were met via oral feeding, and time to effect.

Results: Feasibility and acceptability benchmarks were achieved. Preliminary outcome data suggest rapid tube weaning did not influence reaching 100% oral intake or fully weaning from a feeding tube when used as an adjunct to behavioral intervention.

Conclusion: This study was a prerequisite to support a future efficacy randomized clinical trial to further study how to optimize outcomes to achieve full weaning from tube feeding.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
155
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics (JDBP) is a leading resource for clinicians, teachers, and researchers involved in pediatric healthcare and child development. This important journal covers some of the most challenging issues affecting child development and behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信