审查硬数据保护法对人口可识别信息(DII)的适用性:以马拉维人道主义无人机/无人机图像为例。

Rogers Alunge Alunge Nnangsope
{"title":"审查硬数据保护法对人口可识别信息(DII)的适用性:以马拉维人道主义无人机/无人机图像为例。","authors":"Rogers Alunge Alunge Nnangsope","doi":"10.1186/s41018-025-00174-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research carried out in Northern Malawi concluded that protecting and ensuring responsible use of drone-collected data in disaster-risk areas should be left entirely to the humanitarian organisations collecting these data, with little participation expected of the affected residents, mostly because they will always be coerced into giving up their data in exchange for assistance. One way to guarantee this protection is by applying national rules of data protection law to these drone data processes in the country. However, aerial drone data (e.g. high-resolution images) of a community would usually be demographically identifiable information (DII) which, unlike personally identifiable information (PII), is not substantively regulated by contemporary hard data protection law, i.e. the 2023 Malawi Data Protection Bill (MDPB) which leaves drone DII without any binding regulatory framework and hence less legal protection. Faced with this regulatory obstacle, this paper sets out to propose and evaluate methods through which the data processing principles and rights provided by the MDPB could nevertheless be applied to regulate drone DII collected and processed by humanitarian organisations in Malawi. First, it sought to establish the feasibility of their application among the humanitarian community: to this end, 20 semi-structured interviews were conducted with humanitarian officials operating in the country, with results showing that these officials largely believed the MDPB principles and rights could effectively govern their drone data processes. The paper then proposes some regulatory modifications or 'nudges' which, if adopted by Malawian regulators, could probe humanitarian organisations towards applying the MDPB principles and rights to their drone DII processes, and examines how these principles and rights could be reflected in concrete, drone-related internal policies adopted by these organisations.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41018-025-00174-z.</p>","PeriodicalId":31899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Humanitarian Action","volume":"10 1","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12279557/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the applicability of hard data protection law on demographically identifiable information (DII): the case of humanitarian UAV/drone images in Malawi.\",\"authors\":\"Rogers Alunge Alunge Nnangsope\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41018-025-00174-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Research carried out in Northern Malawi concluded that protecting and ensuring responsible use of drone-collected data in disaster-risk areas should be left entirely to the humanitarian organisations collecting these data, with little participation expected of the affected residents, mostly because they will always be coerced into giving up their data in exchange for assistance. One way to guarantee this protection is by applying national rules of data protection law to these drone data processes in the country. However, aerial drone data (e.g. high-resolution images) of a community would usually be demographically identifiable information (DII) which, unlike personally identifiable information (PII), is not substantively regulated by contemporary hard data protection law, i.e. the 2023 Malawi Data Protection Bill (MDPB) which leaves drone DII without any binding regulatory framework and hence less legal protection. Faced with this regulatory obstacle, this paper sets out to propose and evaluate methods through which the data processing principles and rights provided by the MDPB could nevertheless be applied to regulate drone DII collected and processed by humanitarian organisations in Malawi. First, it sought to establish the feasibility of their application among the humanitarian community: to this end, 20 semi-structured interviews were conducted with humanitarian officials operating in the country, with results showing that these officials largely believed the MDPB principles and rights could effectively govern their drone data processes. The paper then proposes some regulatory modifications or 'nudges' which, if adopted by Malawian regulators, could probe humanitarian organisations towards applying the MDPB principles and rights to their drone DII processes, and examines how these principles and rights could be reflected in concrete, drone-related internal policies adopted by these organisations.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41018-025-00174-z.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":31899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Humanitarian Action\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12279557/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Humanitarian Action\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-025-00174-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Humanitarian Action","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-025-00174-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在马拉维北部进行的研究得出结论,保护和确保在灾害风险地区负责任地使用无人机收集的数据应该完全留给收集这些数据的人道主义组织,而受影响的居民几乎没有参与,主要是因为他们总是被迫放弃他们的数据以换取援助。保证这种保护的一种方法是将国家数据保护法的规则应用于该国的这些无人机数据处理。然而,一个社区的空中无人机数据(例如高分辨率图像)通常是人口可识别信息(DII),与个人可识别信息(PII)不同,它不受当代硬数据保护法的实质性监管,即2023年马拉维数据保护法案(MDPB),该法案使无人机DII没有任何具有约束力的监管框架,因此法律保护较少。面对这一监管障碍,本文着手提出和评估方法,通过这些方法,MDPB提供的数据处理原则和权利可以应用于监管马拉维人道主义组织收集和处理的无人机DII。首先,它试图确定它们在人道主义界应用的可行性:为此,对在该国开展业务的人道主义官员进行了20次半结构化访谈,结果表明,这些官员基本上认为MDPB原则和权利可以有效地管理他们的无人机数据处理。然后,论文提出了一些监管修改或“推动”,如果被马拉维监管机构采用,可以探索人道主义组织将MDPB原则和权利应用于其无人机DII流程,并研究如何将这些原则和权利反映在这些组织采用的具体的、与无人机相关的内部政策中。补充资料:在线版本包含补充资料,下载地址:10.1186/s41018-025-00174-z。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examining the applicability of hard data protection law on demographically identifiable information (DII): the case of humanitarian UAV/drone images in Malawi.

Research carried out in Northern Malawi concluded that protecting and ensuring responsible use of drone-collected data in disaster-risk areas should be left entirely to the humanitarian organisations collecting these data, with little participation expected of the affected residents, mostly because they will always be coerced into giving up their data in exchange for assistance. One way to guarantee this protection is by applying national rules of data protection law to these drone data processes in the country. However, aerial drone data (e.g. high-resolution images) of a community would usually be demographically identifiable information (DII) which, unlike personally identifiable information (PII), is not substantively regulated by contemporary hard data protection law, i.e. the 2023 Malawi Data Protection Bill (MDPB) which leaves drone DII without any binding regulatory framework and hence less legal protection. Faced with this regulatory obstacle, this paper sets out to propose and evaluate methods through which the data processing principles and rights provided by the MDPB could nevertheless be applied to regulate drone DII collected and processed by humanitarian organisations in Malawi. First, it sought to establish the feasibility of their application among the humanitarian community: to this end, 20 semi-structured interviews were conducted with humanitarian officials operating in the country, with results showing that these officials largely believed the MDPB principles and rights could effectively govern their drone data processes. The paper then proposes some regulatory modifications or 'nudges' which, if adopted by Malawian regulators, could probe humanitarian organisations towards applying the MDPB principles and rights to their drone DII processes, and examines how these principles and rights could be reflected in concrete, drone-related internal policies adopted by these organisations.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41018-025-00174-z.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信