器官特异性蛋白质组老化和认知表现:对老年人阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆风险预测的影响

IF 7.8 Q2 BUSINESS
Sujin Kang, Susan Baker, Benedict Hayhoe, Geraint Price, Gerald Novak, Janice Wong, Lefkos Middleton, Oliver Robinson
{"title":"器官特异性蛋白质组老化和认知表现:对老年人阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆风险预测的影响","authors":"Sujin Kang, Susan Baker, Benedict Hayhoe, Geraint Price, Gerald Novak, Janice Wong, Lefkos Middleton, Oliver Robinson","doi":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Biological aging, characterized by cellular and molecular changes, may play a key role in neurodegenerative diseases. While recent proteomic advancements have introduced new aging clocks, widespread validation remains necessary. This study evaluated organ-specific and cognition-enriched proteomic clocks in relation to chronological age and cognitive change.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed plasma proteomic data from the CHARIOT PRO SubStudy (N = 409), measured using the SomaScan assay (version 4.1) at four time points over three years (months 0, 12, 24, and 36). Using published proteomic organ age weights, we calculated conventional, organ-specific, and cognition-enriched biological ages and compared them with chronological age. Adjusted multilevel regression analyses assessed associations between baseline proteomic AgeGaps (biological-chronological age differences) and cognitive performance over 54 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort (mean age: 71.8 ± 5.5 years; 50.1 % female) showed moderate to strong correlations between proteomic ages and chronological age (r = 0.37-0.80; MAE = 4.2-2.7). Over three years, AgeGaps increased across the conventional, organismal, muscle, liver, artery, and immune systems, ranging from 2.1 ± 1.9 to 1.0 ± 2.3 years. The artery AgeGap was most strongly associated with cognitive decline, with conventional and organismal AgeGaps showing similar patterns. Higher baseline AgeGap z-scores (i.e., greater biological age) in the artery and brain were associated with poorer cognition, as measured by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Total Scores (Coeff. -3.0, 95 % CI: -3.4, -2.5; and -1.1, 95 % CI: -1.5, -0.6) and the Preclinical Alzheimer's Cognitive Composite (Coeff. -0.5, 95 % CI: -0.6, -0.4; and -0.14, 95 % CI: -0.3, -0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings highlight the interplay between neurological function and cardiovascular aging in cognitive decline. Organ-specific biological age assessments may aid in the early detection of age-related changes, informing personalized interventions. Our study underscores the importance of proteomic aging signatures in elucidating Alzheimer's disease mechanisms and other neurodegenerative conditions, advocating for an integrated approach to brain and cardiovascular health.</p>","PeriodicalId":22711,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"100274"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12501340/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Organ-specific proteomic aging and cognitive performance: Implications for risk prediction of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias in older adults.\",\"authors\":\"Sujin Kang, Susan Baker, Benedict Hayhoe, Geraint Price, Gerald Novak, Janice Wong, Lefkos Middleton, Oliver Robinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Biological aging, characterized by cellular and molecular changes, may play a key role in neurodegenerative diseases. While recent proteomic advancements have introduced new aging clocks, widespread validation remains necessary. This study evaluated organ-specific and cognition-enriched proteomic clocks in relation to chronological age and cognitive change.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed plasma proteomic data from the CHARIOT PRO SubStudy (N = 409), measured using the SomaScan assay (version 4.1) at four time points over three years (months 0, 12, 24, and 36). Using published proteomic organ age weights, we calculated conventional, organ-specific, and cognition-enriched biological ages and compared them with chronological age. Adjusted multilevel regression analyses assessed associations between baseline proteomic AgeGaps (biological-chronological age differences) and cognitive performance over 54 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort (mean age: 71.8 ± 5.5 years; 50.1 % female) showed moderate to strong correlations between proteomic ages and chronological age (r = 0.37-0.80; MAE = 4.2-2.7). Over three years, AgeGaps increased across the conventional, organismal, muscle, liver, artery, and immune systems, ranging from 2.1 ± 1.9 to 1.0 ± 2.3 years. The artery AgeGap was most strongly associated with cognitive decline, with conventional and organismal AgeGaps showing similar patterns. Higher baseline AgeGap z-scores (i.e., greater biological age) in the artery and brain were associated with poorer cognition, as measured by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Total Scores (Coeff. -3.0, 95 % CI: -3.4, -2.5; and -1.1, 95 % CI: -1.5, -0.6) and the Preclinical Alzheimer's Cognitive Composite (Coeff. -0.5, 95 % CI: -0.6, -0.4; and -0.14, 95 % CI: -0.3, -0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings highlight the interplay between neurological function and cardiovascular aging in cognitive decline. Organ-specific biological age assessments may aid in the early detection of age-related changes, informing personalized interventions. Our study underscores the importance of proteomic aging signatures in elucidating Alzheimer's disease mechanisms and other neurodegenerative conditions, advocating for an integrated approach to brain and cardiovascular health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"100274\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12501340/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100274\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:以细胞和分子变化为特征的生物衰老可能在神经退行性疾病中起关键作用。虽然最近蛋白质组学的进步引入了新的衰老时钟,但广泛的验证仍然是必要的。这项研究评估了器官特异性和认知富集的蛋白质组时钟与实足年龄和认知变化的关系。方法:我们分析了来自CHARIOT PRO SubStudy (N = 409)的血浆蛋白质组学数据,使用SomaScan测定法(版本4.1)在三年内(第0、12、24和36个月)的四个时间点进行测量。利用已发表的蛋白质组学器官年龄权重,我们计算了常规、器官特异性和认知富集的生物年龄,并将它们与实足年龄进行了比较。调整后的多水平回归分析评估了基线蛋白质组AgeGaps(生物-实足年龄差异)与54个月内认知表现之间的关系。结果:队列(平均年龄:71.8±5.5岁;50.1%的女性)显示出蛋白质组年龄和实足年龄的中度到强相关性(r = 0.37-0.80;Mae = 4.2-2.7)。在三年中,AgeGaps在常规、组织、肌肉、肝脏、动脉和免疫系统中均有所增加,从2.1±1.9到1.0±2.3年不等。动脉AgeGap与认知能力下降的关系最为密切,常规和有机AgeGap表现出相似的模式。较高的基线AgeGap z分数(即较大的生物年龄)在动脉和大脑中与较差的认知相关,可重复电池评估神经心理状态总分(Coeff。-3.0, 95% ci: -3.4, -2.5;和-1.1,95% CI: -1.5, -0.6)和临床前阿尔茨海默氏症认知复合(Coeff。-0.5, 95% ci: -0.6, -0.4;和-0.14,95% CI: -0.3, -0.03)。结论:这些发现强调了认知能力下降中神经功能和心血管老化之间的相互作用。器官特异性生物年龄评估可能有助于早期发现与年龄相关的变化,为个性化干预提供信息。我们的研究强调了蛋白质组学衰老特征在阐明阿尔茨海默病机制和其他神经退行性疾病中的重要性,提倡对大脑和心血管健康采取综合方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Organ-specific proteomic aging and cognitive performance: Implications for risk prediction of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias in older adults.

Background and objectives: Biological aging, characterized by cellular and molecular changes, may play a key role in neurodegenerative diseases. While recent proteomic advancements have introduced new aging clocks, widespread validation remains necessary. This study evaluated organ-specific and cognition-enriched proteomic clocks in relation to chronological age and cognitive change.

Methods: We analyzed plasma proteomic data from the CHARIOT PRO SubStudy (N = 409), measured using the SomaScan assay (version 4.1) at four time points over three years (months 0, 12, 24, and 36). Using published proteomic organ age weights, we calculated conventional, organ-specific, and cognition-enriched biological ages and compared them with chronological age. Adjusted multilevel regression analyses assessed associations between baseline proteomic AgeGaps (biological-chronological age differences) and cognitive performance over 54 months.

Results: The cohort (mean age: 71.8 ± 5.5 years; 50.1 % female) showed moderate to strong correlations between proteomic ages and chronological age (r = 0.37-0.80; MAE = 4.2-2.7). Over three years, AgeGaps increased across the conventional, organismal, muscle, liver, artery, and immune systems, ranging from 2.1 ± 1.9 to 1.0 ± 2.3 years. The artery AgeGap was most strongly associated with cognitive decline, with conventional and organismal AgeGaps showing similar patterns. Higher baseline AgeGap z-scores (i.e., greater biological age) in the artery and brain were associated with poorer cognition, as measured by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Total Scores (Coeff. -3.0, 95 % CI: -3.4, -2.5; and -1.1, 95 % CI: -1.5, -0.6) and the Preclinical Alzheimer's Cognitive Composite (Coeff. -0.5, 95 % CI: -0.6, -0.4; and -0.14, 95 % CI: -0.3, -0.03).

Conclusions: These findings highlight the interplay between neurological function and cardiovascular aging in cognitive decline. Organ-specific biological age assessments may aid in the early detection of age-related changes, informing personalized interventions. Our study underscores the importance of proteomic aging signatures in elucidating Alzheimer's disease mechanisms and other neurodegenerative conditions, advocating for an integrated approach to brain and cardiovascular health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The JPAD Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer’Disease will publish reviews, original research articles and short reports to improve our knowledge in the field of Alzheimer prevention including: neurosciences, biomarkers, imaging, epidemiology, public health, physical cognitive exercise, nutrition, risk and protective factors, drug development, trials design, and heath economic outcomes.JPAD will publish also the meeting abstracts from Clinical Trial on Alzheimer Disease (CTAD) and will be distributed both in paper and online version worldwide.We hope that JPAD with your contribution will play a role in the development of Alzheimer prevention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信