脓毒症分子内型的预后评估:巴西的一项多中心队列研究。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
SHOCK Pub Date : 2025-06-30 DOI:10.1097/SHK.0000000000002661
Fernanda do Carmo De Stefani, Ana Carolina de Miranda, Bruna Cassia Dal Vesco, Dalila Luciola Zanette, Anelis Maria Marin, Luis Gustavo Morello, Igor Alexandre Côrtes de Menezes
{"title":"脓毒症分子内型的预后评估:巴西的一项多中心队列研究。","authors":"Fernanda do Carmo De Stefani, Ana Carolina de Miranda, Bruna Cassia Dal Vesco, Dalila Luciola Zanette, Anelis Maria Marin, Luis Gustavo Morello, Igor Alexandre Côrtes de Menezes","doi":"10.1097/SHK.0000000000002661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis heterogeneity affects the identification of high-risk patients. Outcomes in low- and middle-income countries are worse than those in developed nations. This study aimed to assess the prognostic potential of the previously described molecular endotypes, Mars1, Mars2, Mars3, and Mars4, in a Brazilian cohort with sepsis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This prospective, multicenter, observational study identified molecular expression-based endotypes in adults from four intensive care units in Brazil. Patients on their first 24-hour diagnosis of sepsis based on the Sepsis 3 criteria were included. Health care workers were included in the control group. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was used to quantify the transcripted levels of eight genes and determine the four endotypes. The primary endpoint was 28-day mortality with a secondary analysis of diagnostic accuracy. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-hundred-sixty-eight participants and twenty-five controls were enrolled in this study. The overall mortality rate was 44%. The Mars1 group showed a higher 28-day mortality than the non-Mars1group. The log-rank test showed a worst survival probability in Mars1 subgroup (P = 0.013), and the hazard ratio was 1.78 (P = 0.017). Compared to control, area-under-the-curve (AUC) of ROC curves for diagnosing sepsis were: 0.69 for Mars1 (SD 0.62-0.77 / P = 0.0016), 0.89 for Mars2 (SD 0.85-0.94 / P < 0.0001), 0.82 for Mars3 (SD 0.75-0.88 / P < 0.0001) and 0.71 for Mars4 (SD 0.64-0.79 / P < 0.0006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Mars1 endotype detected by qRT-PCR was associated with worse sepsis survival in low-to middle-income countries. We also identified the Mars 2 endotype as a potential diagnostic marker for sepsis.</p>","PeriodicalId":21667,"journal":{"name":"SHOCK","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic evaluation of molecular endotypes in sepsis: a multicenter cohort study in Brazil.\",\"authors\":\"Fernanda do Carmo De Stefani, Ana Carolina de Miranda, Bruna Cassia Dal Vesco, Dalila Luciola Zanette, Anelis Maria Marin, Luis Gustavo Morello, Igor Alexandre Côrtes de Menezes\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SHK.0000000000002661\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis heterogeneity affects the identification of high-risk patients. Outcomes in low- and middle-income countries are worse than those in developed nations. This study aimed to assess the prognostic potential of the previously described molecular endotypes, Mars1, Mars2, Mars3, and Mars4, in a Brazilian cohort with sepsis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This prospective, multicenter, observational study identified molecular expression-based endotypes in adults from four intensive care units in Brazil. Patients on their first 24-hour diagnosis of sepsis based on the Sepsis 3 criteria were included. Health care workers were included in the control group. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was used to quantify the transcripted levels of eight genes and determine the four endotypes. The primary endpoint was 28-day mortality with a secondary analysis of diagnostic accuracy. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-hundred-sixty-eight participants and twenty-five controls were enrolled in this study. The overall mortality rate was 44%. The Mars1 group showed a higher 28-day mortality than the non-Mars1group. The log-rank test showed a worst survival probability in Mars1 subgroup (P = 0.013), and the hazard ratio was 1.78 (P = 0.017). Compared to control, area-under-the-curve (AUC) of ROC curves for diagnosing sepsis were: 0.69 for Mars1 (SD 0.62-0.77 / P = 0.0016), 0.89 for Mars2 (SD 0.85-0.94 / P < 0.0001), 0.82 for Mars3 (SD 0.75-0.88 / P < 0.0001) and 0.71 for Mars4 (SD 0.64-0.79 / P < 0.0006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Mars1 endotype detected by qRT-PCR was associated with worse sepsis survival in low-to middle-income countries. We also identified the Mars 2 endotype as a potential diagnostic marker for sepsis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SHOCK\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SHOCK\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000002661\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SHOCK","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000002661","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脓毒症的异质性影响高危患者的识别。低收入和中等收入国家的结果比发达国家更糟。本研究旨在评估先前描述的分子内分型mar1、mar2、mar3和mar4在巴西脓毒症队列中的预后潜力。材料和方法:这项前瞻性、多中心、观察性研究在巴西四个重症监护病房的成人中确定了基于分子表达的内型。根据脓毒症3标准首次24小时诊断为脓毒症的患者纳入研究。卫生保健工作者被纳入对照组。采用实时定量聚合酶链反应(qRT-PCR)定量8个基因的转录水平,确定4种内源性基因。主要终点是28天死亡率,其次是诊断准确性分析。差异有统计学意义,P < 0.05。结果:本研究共纳入168名受试者和25名对照组。总死亡率为44%。火星组28天死亡率高于非火星组。log-rank检验显示,mar1亚组生存率最低(P = 0.013),风险比为1.78 (P = 0.017)。与对照组相比,诊断脓毒症的ROC曲线下面积(AUC): mar1为0.69 (SD 0.62-0.77 / P = 0.0016), mar2为0.89 (SD 0.85-0.94 / P < 0.0001), mar3为0.82 (SD 0.75-0.88 / P < 0.0001), mar4为0.71 (SD 0.64-0.79 / P < 0.0006)。结论:在中低收入国家,qRT-PCR检测的Mars1内型与较差的脓毒症生存率相关。我们还发现Mars 2内型是脓毒症的潜在诊断标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prognostic evaluation of molecular endotypes in sepsis: a multicenter cohort study in Brazil.

Background: Sepsis heterogeneity affects the identification of high-risk patients. Outcomes in low- and middle-income countries are worse than those in developed nations. This study aimed to assess the prognostic potential of the previously described molecular endotypes, Mars1, Mars2, Mars3, and Mars4, in a Brazilian cohort with sepsis.

Material and methods: This prospective, multicenter, observational study identified molecular expression-based endotypes in adults from four intensive care units in Brazil. Patients on their first 24-hour diagnosis of sepsis based on the Sepsis 3 criteria were included. Health care workers were included in the control group. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was used to quantify the transcripted levels of eight genes and determine the four endotypes. The primary endpoint was 28-day mortality with a secondary analysis of diagnostic accuracy. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results: One-hundred-sixty-eight participants and twenty-five controls were enrolled in this study. The overall mortality rate was 44%. The Mars1 group showed a higher 28-day mortality than the non-Mars1group. The log-rank test showed a worst survival probability in Mars1 subgroup (P = 0.013), and the hazard ratio was 1.78 (P = 0.017). Compared to control, area-under-the-curve (AUC) of ROC curves for diagnosing sepsis were: 0.69 for Mars1 (SD 0.62-0.77 / P = 0.0016), 0.89 for Mars2 (SD 0.85-0.94 / P < 0.0001), 0.82 for Mars3 (SD 0.75-0.88 / P < 0.0001) and 0.71 for Mars4 (SD 0.64-0.79 / P < 0.0006).

Conclusion: The Mars1 endotype detected by qRT-PCR was associated with worse sepsis survival in low-to middle-income countries. We also identified the Mars 2 endotype as a potential diagnostic marker for sepsis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SHOCK
SHOCK 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
199
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: SHOCK®: Injury, Inflammation, and Sepsis: Laboratory and Clinical Approaches includes studies of novel therapeutic approaches, such as immunomodulation, gene therapy, nutrition, and others. The mission of the Journal is to foster and promote multidisciplinary studies, both experimental and clinical in nature, that critically examine the etiology, mechanisms and novel therapeutics of shock-related pathophysiological conditions. Its purpose is to excel as a vehicle for timely publication in the areas of basic and clinical studies of shock, trauma, sepsis, inflammation, ischemia, and related pathobiological states, with particular emphasis on the biologic mechanisms that determine the response to such injury. Making such information available will ultimately facilitate improved care of the traumatized or septic individual.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信