与机器人全髋关节置换术相关的学习曲线:范围回顾。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-23 DOI:10.1111/os.70130
Abith Ganesh Kamath, Saran Singh Gill, Srikar Reddy Namireddy, Matija Krkovic
{"title":"与机器人全髋关节置换术相关的学习曲线:范围回顾。","authors":"Abith Ganesh Kamath, Saran Singh Gill, Srikar Reddy Namireddy, Matija Krkovic","doi":"10.1111/os.70130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Robotic total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) is gaining widespread adoption, yet the learning curve (LC) associated with its implementation remains uncertain. Understanding LCs is crucial to optimizing training protocols and improving patient outcomes. This scoping review assesses LCs in rTHA by evaluating operative time, leg length discrepancy (LLD), and acetabular component inclination (ACI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science following PRISMA guidelines. Studies assessing the LC of rTHA based on operative efficiency, radiographic accuracy, and surgical outcomes were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 studies were included. Improvements in operative time were observed at a median of 13 cases, ranging from 7 to 35 cases. Both LLD and ACI findings were inconsistent, with little evidence of a LC found in the literature.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review highlights the learning curve in rTHA, with proficiency improving after early cases. Standardized benchmarks and training models could enhance learning and enable comparisons across robotic systems. Future research should refine proficiency thresholds, assess system differences, and develop structured training for optimal rTHA adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":19566,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2529-2540"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12404875/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning Curves Associated With Robotic Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Abith Ganesh Kamath, Saran Singh Gill, Srikar Reddy Namireddy, Matija Krkovic\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/os.70130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Robotic total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) is gaining widespread adoption, yet the learning curve (LC) associated with its implementation remains uncertain. Understanding LCs is crucial to optimizing training protocols and improving patient outcomes. This scoping review assesses LCs in rTHA by evaluating operative time, leg length discrepancy (LLD), and acetabular component inclination (ACI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science following PRISMA guidelines. Studies assessing the LC of rTHA based on operative efficiency, radiographic accuracy, and surgical outcomes were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 studies were included. Improvements in operative time were observed at a median of 13 cases, ranging from 7 to 35 cases. Both LLD and ACI findings were inconsistent, with little evidence of a LC found in the literature.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review highlights the learning curve in rTHA, with proficiency improving after early cases. Standardized benchmarks and training models could enhance learning and enable comparisons across robotic systems. Future research should refine proficiency thresholds, assess system differences, and develop structured training for optimal rTHA adoption.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19566,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2529-2540\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12404875/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.70130\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.70130","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

机器人全髋关节置换术(rTHA)正在获得广泛的采用,然而与其实施相关的学习曲线(LC)仍然不确定。了解LCs对于优化培训方案和改善患者预后至关重要。本综述通过评估手术时间、腿长差异(LLD)和髋臼成分倾角(ACI)来评估rTHA中的LCs。方法:系统检索PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus和Web of Science,遵循PRISMA指南。包括基于手术效率、影像学准确性和手术结果评估rTHA LC的研究。结果:共纳入12项研究。手术时间的改善中位数为13例,从7例到35例不等。LLD和ACI的结果都不一致,文献中几乎没有LC的证据。结论:本综述强调了rTHA的学习曲线,在早期病例后熟练程度提高。标准化的基准和训练模型可以加强机器人系统之间的学习和比较。未来的研究应细化熟练度阈值,评估系统差异,并制定最佳rTHA采用的结构化培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Learning Curves Associated With Robotic Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Scoping Review.

Learning Curves Associated With Robotic Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Scoping Review.

Learning Curves Associated With Robotic Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Scoping Review.

Learning Curves Associated With Robotic Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Scoping Review.

Introduction: Robotic total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) is gaining widespread adoption, yet the learning curve (LC) associated with its implementation remains uncertain. Understanding LCs is crucial to optimizing training protocols and improving patient outcomes. This scoping review assesses LCs in rTHA by evaluating operative time, leg length discrepancy (LLD), and acetabular component inclination (ACI).

Methods: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science following PRISMA guidelines. Studies assessing the LC of rTHA based on operative efficiency, radiographic accuracy, and surgical outcomes were included.

Results: A total of 12 studies were included. Improvements in operative time were observed at a median of 13 cases, ranging from 7 to 35 cases. Both LLD and ACI findings were inconsistent, with little evidence of a LC found in the literature.

Conclusion: This review highlights the learning curve in rTHA, with proficiency improving after early cases. Standardized benchmarks and training models could enhance learning and enable comparisons across robotic systems. Future research should refine proficiency thresholds, assess system differences, and develop structured training for optimal rTHA adoption.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Surgery
Orthopaedic Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedic Surgery (OS) is the official journal of the Chinese Orthopaedic Association, focusing on all aspects of orthopaedic technique and surgery. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles in the following categories: Original Articles, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Guidelines, Editorials, Commentaries, Surgical Techniques, Case Reports and Meeting Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信