新兴的自有品牌市场准入渠道将有助于还是阻碍生物仿制药市场准入?

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Stanton R Mehr
{"title":"新兴的自有品牌市场准入渠道将有助于还是阻碍生物仿制药市场准入?","authors":"Stanton R Mehr","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.8.824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Until April 2024, adalimumab biosimilar uptake remained stagnant at 2% to 3%; the 3 largest pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), which control 80% of prescriptions dispensed in the United States, maintained the reference product on formulary. That month, a major PBM changed its adalimumab formulary coverage policy, preferring 2 private-label biosimilars and 1 branded biosimilar, while excluding the reference product. The private-label biosimilar approach has since been adopted by the other 2 major PBMs, offering promise for biosimilar uptake, but seemingly only under the terms of the private-label arrangements. These arrangements may pose additional transparency issues for payers and plan sponsors, as well as barriers to biosimilar competition. The concerns raised by the emergence of the private-label channel apply not only to the adalimumab category but to ustekinumab and future biosimilars covered under the pharmacy benefit. Stakeholders concerned with biosimilar sustainability should monitor this situation as it continues to unfold for its effects on competition, conflicts of interest, and future biosimilar development.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":"31 8","pages":"824-827"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12288720/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Will the emerging private-label market access channel help or hinder biosimilar market access?\",\"authors\":\"Stanton R Mehr\",\"doi\":\"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.8.824\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Until April 2024, adalimumab biosimilar uptake remained stagnant at 2% to 3%; the 3 largest pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), which control 80% of prescriptions dispensed in the United States, maintained the reference product on formulary. That month, a major PBM changed its adalimumab formulary coverage policy, preferring 2 private-label biosimilars and 1 branded biosimilar, while excluding the reference product. The private-label biosimilar approach has since been adopted by the other 2 major PBMs, offering promise for biosimilar uptake, but seemingly only under the terms of the private-label arrangements. These arrangements may pose additional transparency issues for payers and plan sponsors, as well as barriers to biosimilar competition. The concerns raised by the emergence of the private-label channel apply not only to the adalimumab category but to ustekinumab and future biosimilars covered under the pharmacy benefit. Stakeholders concerned with biosimilar sustainability should monitor this situation as it continues to unfold for its effects on competition, conflicts of interest, and future biosimilar development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"31 8\",\"pages\":\"824-827\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12288720/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.8.824\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.8.824","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

直到2024年4月,阿达木单抗生物类似药的摄取仍然停滞在2%至3%;3家最大的药房福利管理机构(PBMs)控制着美国80%的处方,在处方表上维护参比产品。当月,一家主要的PBM改变了其阿达木单抗处方覆盖政策,偏爱2种自有品牌生物仿制药和1种品牌生物仿制药,而不包括参比产品。自那以后,其他两家主要药品福利管理公司采用了自有品牌生物仿制药方法,提供了生物仿制药吸收的承诺,但似乎只是在自有品牌安排的条款下。这些安排可能会给支付者和计划发起人带来额外的透明度问题,以及生物仿制药竞争的障碍。由自有品牌渠道的出现引起的担忧不仅适用于阿达木单抗类别,也适用于ustekinumab和未来的生物仿制药。关注生物仿制药可持续性的利益相关者应该监控这一情况,因为它将继续对竞争、利益冲突和未来生物仿制药发展产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Will the emerging private-label market access channel help or hinder biosimilar market access?

Until April 2024, adalimumab biosimilar uptake remained stagnant at 2% to 3%; the 3 largest pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), which control 80% of prescriptions dispensed in the United States, maintained the reference product on formulary. That month, a major PBM changed its adalimumab formulary coverage policy, preferring 2 private-label biosimilars and 1 branded biosimilar, while excluding the reference product. The private-label biosimilar approach has since been adopted by the other 2 major PBMs, offering promise for biosimilar uptake, but seemingly only under the terms of the private-label arrangements. These arrangements may pose additional transparency issues for payers and plan sponsors, as well as barriers to biosimilar competition. The concerns raised by the emergence of the private-label channel apply not only to the adalimumab category but to ustekinumab and future biosimilars covered under the pharmacy benefit. Stakeholders concerned with biosimilar sustainability should monitor this situation as it continues to unfold for its effects on competition, conflicts of interest, and future biosimilar development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: JMCP welcomes research studies conducted outside of the United States that are relevant to our readership. Our audience is primarily concerned with designing policies of formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs that are based on evidence from large populations of people. Studies of pharmacist interventions conducted outside the United States that have already been extensively studied within the United States and studies of small sample sizes in non-managed care environments outside of the United States (e.g., hospitals or community pharmacies) are generally of low interest to our readership. However, studies of health outcomes and costs assessed in large populations that provide evidence for formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs are of high interest to JMCP’s readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信