{"title":"评估腹膜弹性层浸润对pT3型胃癌患者分层的改善作用。","authors":"Daiki Terajima, Motohiro Kojima, Shingo Sakashita, Tetsuro Taki, Takahiro Kinoshita, Genichiro Ishii, Naoya Sakamoto","doi":"10.1007/s10120-025-01627-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Elastic laminal invasion (ELI), defined as tumor invasion beyond the peritoneal elastic lamina, may affect gastric cancer (GC) prognosis, though limited data exist on this relationship.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed representative pathological slides from 396 patients with pT3 or pT4a GC who underwent curative resection to assess the association between ELI and relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 5-year RFS of pT3 GC with negative ELI was 85.9%, which was better than the 55.9% of that of ELI-positive pT3 (P < 0.001) or pT4a (51.3%) GC (P < 0.001). Similarly, the 5-year OS of ELI-negative pT3 GC was 90.4%, while the corresponding values for ELI-positive pT3 and pT4a were 67.0% (P < 0.001) and 63.6% (P < 0.001), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the most significant prognostic factors for RFS were pT factors (i.e., pT3 with ELI/pT4), tumor size (≥ 80 mm), and nodal metastasis. We subdivided our cohort of patients with pathological stage II (pT3N0, pT3N1) GC into ELI-negative and ELI-positive subgroups, and found that the ELI-negative ones had better RFS percentages than those who were ELI-positive or stage III (P = 0.002 and P < 0.001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ELI-positive pT3 GC has a worse prognosis than its ELI-negative counterpart, comparable to that of pT4a. These findings suggest a need to revisit the pT grading system in GC.</p>","PeriodicalId":12684,"journal":{"name":"Gastric Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"862-871"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating peritoneal elastic laminal invasion to improve stratification of patients with pT3 gastric cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Daiki Terajima, Motohiro Kojima, Shingo Sakashita, Tetsuro Taki, Takahiro Kinoshita, Genichiro Ishii, Naoya Sakamoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10120-025-01627-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Elastic laminal invasion (ELI), defined as tumor invasion beyond the peritoneal elastic lamina, may affect gastric cancer (GC) prognosis, though limited data exist on this relationship.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed representative pathological slides from 396 patients with pT3 or pT4a GC who underwent curative resection to assess the association between ELI and relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 5-year RFS of pT3 GC with negative ELI was 85.9%, which was better than the 55.9% of that of ELI-positive pT3 (P < 0.001) or pT4a (51.3%) GC (P < 0.001). Similarly, the 5-year OS of ELI-negative pT3 GC was 90.4%, while the corresponding values for ELI-positive pT3 and pT4a were 67.0% (P < 0.001) and 63.6% (P < 0.001), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the most significant prognostic factors for RFS were pT factors (i.e., pT3 with ELI/pT4), tumor size (≥ 80 mm), and nodal metastasis. We subdivided our cohort of patients with pathological stage II (pT3N0, pT3N1) GC into ELI-negative and ELI-positive subgroups, and found that the ELI-negative ones had better RFS percentages than those who were ELI-positive or stage III (P = 0.002 and P < 0.001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ELI-positive pT3 GC has a worse prognosis than its ELI-negative counterpart, comparable to that of pT4a. These findings suggest a need to revisit the pT grading system in GC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastric Cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"862-871\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastric Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-025-01627-5\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastric Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-025-01627-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating peritoneal elastic laminal invasion to improve stratification of patients with pT3 gastric cancer.
Background: Elastic laminal invasion (ELI), defined as tumor invasion beyond the peritoneal elastic lamina, may affect gastric cancer (GC) prognosis, though limited data exist on this relationship.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed representative pathological slides from 396 patients with pT3 or pT4a GC who underwent curative resection to assess the association between ELI and relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).
Results: The 5-year RFS of pT3 GC with negative ELI was 85.9%, which was better than the 55.9% of that of ELI-positive pT3 (P < 0.001) or pT4a (51.3%) GC (P < 0.001). Similarly, the 5-year OS of ELI-negative pT3 GC was 90.4%, while the corresponding values for ELI-positive pT3 and pT4a were 67.0% (P < 0.001) and 63.6% (P < 0.001), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the most significant prognostic factors for RFS were pT factors (i.e., pT3 with ELI/pT4), tumor size (≥ 80 mm), and nodal metastasis. We subdivided our cohort of patients with pathological stage II (pT3N0, pT3N1) GC into ELI-negative and ELI-positive subgroups, and found that the ELI-negative ones had better RFS percentages than those who were ELI-positive or stage III (P = 0.002 and P < 0.001, respectively).
Conclusions: ELI-positive pT3 GC has a worse prognosis than its ELI-negative counterpart, comparable to that of pT4a. These findings suggest a need to revisit the pT grading system in GC.
期刊介绍:
Gastric Cancer is an esteemed global forum that focuses on various aspects of gastric cancer research, treatment, and biology worldwide.
The journal promotes a diverse range of content, including original articles, case reports, short communications, and technical notes. It also welcomes Letters to the Editor discussing published articles or sharing viewpoints on gastric cancer topics.
Review articles are predominantly sought after by the Editor, ensuring comprehensive coverage of the field.
With a dedicated and knowledgeable editorial team, the journal is committed to providing exceptional support and ensuring high levels of author satisfaction. In fact, over 90% of published authors have expressed their intent to publish again in our esteemed journal.