浸润性小叶性乳腺癌患者的临床挑战及建议解决方案。

IF 65.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
K Van Baelen, E Sawyer, J Van Cauwenberge, P Aftimos, M F Covington, M Maetens, G Zels, C Brisken, L Djerroudi, R Dresen, A Fitzpatrick, R L Flaherty, G Floris, S Freeney, A B Hanker, D Honey, C M Isacke, R C Jankowitz, R Jeselsohn, T Koorman, C Kuhl, S Linn, C J Lord, C Malhaire, J Mouabbi, R Mukhtar, G Nader-Marta, R Natrajan, P Neven, S Oesterreich, J L Sandoval, S J Schnitt, E Senkus, C Turner, V Vandecaveye, H Wildiers, A Vincent-Salomon, P W B Derksen, C Desmedt
{"title":"浸润性小叶性乳腺癌患者的临床挑战及建议解决方案。","authors":"K Van Baelen, E Sawyer, J Van Cauwenberge, P Aftimos, M F Covington, M Maetens, G Zels, C Brisken, L Djerroudi, R Dresen, A Fitzpatrick, R L Flaherty, G Floris, S Freeney, A B Hanker, D Honey, C M Isacke, R C Jankowitz, R Jeselsohn, T Koorman, C Kuhl, S Linn, C J Lord, C Malhaire, J Mouabbi, R Mukhtar, G Nader-Marta, R Natrajan, P Neven, S Oesterreich, J L Sandoval, S J Schnitt, E Senkus, C Turner, V Vandecaveye, H Wildiers, A Vincent-Salomon, P W B Derksen, C Desmedt","doi":"10.1016/j.annonc.2025.07.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is the second most common type of breast cancer and is increasingly recognized as a separate entity from invasive breast cancer of no-special type. Here, we present the current standings and challenges of clinical ILC research and discuss possible solutions to address these challenges.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>European and United States experts on ILC have summarized the recent developments, ongoing endeavors and remaining challenges concerning the histopathological diagnosis, imaging and treatment of ILC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Recent endeavors have led to guidelines for a more uniform and standardized pathological diagnosis of ILC. Future efforts are needed to refine the histological and biological subclassification and determine the indications for use of artificial intelligence for pathological diagnosis. Since standard-of-care imaging tools are suboptimal for ILC screening and local and systemic staging, new modalities such as contrast-enhanced mammography, novel positron emission tomography tracers and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging are under investigation. An alternative to the currently used RECIST v1.1 criteria is needed for clinical trial response assessment, as it is not uniformly applicable for patients with metastatic ILC. The use of liquid biopsies for detecting disease progression needs dedicated research. Regarding treatment, the efficacy of novel breast cancer therapies needs to be examined specifically for ILC, and evaluation of drugs targeting ILC-specific or enriched targets is warranted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While great progress has been made in ILC research, many challenges remain and require further investigation in the clinic to optimize treatment and outcomes for those diagnosed with this common tumor type.</p>","PeriodicalId":8000,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":65.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical challenges and proposed solutions for patients with invasive lobular breast cancer.\",\"authors\":\"K Van Baelen, E Sawyer, J Van Cauwenberge, P Aftimos, M F Covington, M Maetens, G Zels, C Brisken, L Djerroudi, R Dresen, A Fitzpatrick, R L Flaherty, G Floris, S Freeney, A B Hanker, D Honey, C M Isacke, R C Jankowitz, R Jeselsohn, T Koorman, C Kuhl, S Linn, C J Lord, C Malhaire, J Mouabbi, R Mukhtar, G Nader-Marta, R Natrajan, P Neven, S Oesterreich, J L Sandoval, S J Schnitt, E Senkus, C Turner, V Vandecaveye, H Wildiers, A Vincent-Salomon, P W B Derksen, C Desmedt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.annonc.2025.07.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is the second most common type of breast cancer and is increasingly recognized as a separate entity from invasive breast cancer of no-special type. Here, we present the current standings and challenges of clinical ILC research and discuss possible solutions to address these challenges.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>European and United States experts on ILC have summarized the recent developments, ongoing endeavors and remaining challenges concerning the histopathological diagnosis, imaging and treatment of ILC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Recent endeavors have led to guidelines for a more uniform and standardized pathological diagnosis of ILC. Future efforts are needed to refine the histological and biological subclassification and determine the indications for use of artificial intelligence for pathological diagnosis. Since standard-of-care imaging tools are suboptimal for ILC screening and local and systemic staging, new modalities such as contrast-enhanced mammography, novel positron emission tomography tracers and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging are under investigation. An alternative to the currently used RECIST v1.1 criteria is needed for clinical trial response assessment, as it is not uniformly applicable for patients with metastatic ILC. The use of liquid biopsies for detecting disease progression needs dedicated research. Regarding treatment, the efficacy of novel breast cancer therapies needs to be examined specifically for ILC, and evaluation of drugs targeting ILC-specific or enriched targets is warranted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While great progress has been made in ILC research, many challenges remain and require further investigation in the clinic to optimize treatment and outcomes for those diagnosed with this common tumor type.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":65.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2025.07.008\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2025.07.008","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:浸润性小叶癌(ILC)是第二常见的乳腺癌类型,并且越来越多地被认为是与无特殊类型的浸润性乳腺癌分开的一个实体。在这里,我们介绍了临床ILC研究的现状和挑战,并讨论了应对这些挑战的可能解决方案。设计:欧洲和美国的ILC专家总结了ILC的组织病理学诊断、成像和治疗方面的最新进展、正在进行的努力以及仍然存在的挑战。结果:最近的努力导致了更统一和标准化的ILC病理诊断指南。未来需要努力完善组织学和生物学亚分类,并确定使用人工智能进行病理诊断的适应症。由于标准护理成像工具对于ILC筛查以及局部和全身分期都不是最佳选择,因此正在研究新的模式,如对比增强乳房x线摄影(CEM),新型正电子发射断层扫描(PET)示踪剂和扩散加权磁共振成像(MRI)。临床试验反应评估需要替代目前使用的RECIST v1.1标准,因为它并不统一适用于转移性ILC患者。液体活检用于检测疾病进展需要专门的研究。在治疗方面,新的乳腺癌治疗方法的疗效需要专门针对ILC进行检查,并评估针对ILC特异性或富集靶点的药物是必要的。结论:尽管ILC研究取得了很大进展,但仍存在许多挑战,需要在临床中进一步研究,以优化诊断为这种常见肿瘤类型的治疗和结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical challenges and proposed solutions for patients with invasive lobular breast cancer.

Background: Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is the second most common type of breast cancer and is increasingly recognized as a separate entity from invasive breast cancer of no-special type. Here, we present the current standings and challenges of clinical ILC research and discuss possible solutions to address these challenges.

Design: European and United States experts on ILC have summarized the recent developments, ongoing endeavors and remaining challenges concerning the histopathological diagnosis, imaging and treatment of ILC.

Results: Recent endeavors have led to guidelines for a more uniform and standardized pathological diagnosis of ILC. Future efforts are needed to refine the histological and biological subclassification and determine the indications for use of artificial intelligence for pathological diagnosis. Since standard-of-care imaging tools are suboptimal for ILC screening and local and systemic staging, new modalities such as contrast-enhanced mammography, novel positron emission tomography tracers and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging are under investigation. An alternative to the currently used RECIST v1.1 criteria is needed for clinical trial response assessment, as it is not uniformly applicable for patients with metastatic ILC. The use of liquid biopsies for detecting disease progression needs dedicated research. Regarding treatment, the efficacy of novel breast cancer therapies needs to be examined specifically for ILC, and evaluation of drugs targeting ILC-specific or enriched targets is warranted.

Conclusions: While great progress has been made in ILC research, many challenges remain and require further investigation in the clinic to optimize treatment and outcomes for those diagnosed with this common tumor type.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Oncology
Annals of Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
63.90
自引率
1.00%
发文量
3712
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Oncology, the official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology and the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology, offers rapid and efficient peer-reviewed publications on innovative cancer treatments and translational research in oncology and precision medicine. The journal primarily focuses on areas such as systemic anticancer therapy, with a specific emphasis on molecular targeted agents and new immune therapies. We also welcome randomized trials, including negative results, as well as top-level guidelines. Additionally, we encourage submissions in emerging fields that are crucial to personalized medicine, such as molecular pathology, bioinformatics, modern statistics, and biotechnologies. Manuscripts related to radiotherapy, surgery, and pediatrics will be considered if they demonstrate a clear interaction with any of the aforementioned fields or if they present groundbreaking findings. Our international editorial board comprises renowned experts who are leaders in their respective fields. Through Annals of Oncology, we strive to provide the most effective communication on the dynamic and ever-evolving global oncology landscape.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信