Upadacitinib与阿维A治疗掌跖脓疱急性期脓疱:一项单中心、开放标签前瞻性队列研究

IF 8.8 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Dawei Huang, Xingyu Jiang, Nan Yang, Yu Wang, Ying Li, Xuemei Yi, Chunyuan Guo, Yunlu Gao, Yuling Shi
{"title":"Upadacitinib与阿维A治疗掌跖脓疱急性期脓疱:一项单中心、开放标签前瞻性队列研究","authors":"Dawei Huang,&nbsp;Xingyu Jiang,&nbsp;Nan Yang,&nbsp;Yu Wang,&nbsp;Ying Li,&nbsp;Xuemei Yi,&nbsp;Chunyuan Guo,&nbsp;Yunlu Gao,&nbsp;Yuling Shi","doi":"10.1007/s40257-025-00971-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by recurrent pustules on the palms and soles. Current treatments, including topical medications, phototherapy, and systemic therapies, often show limited efficacy. Upadacitinib (UPA), a selective JAK1 inhibitor, has shown potential in treating neutrophilic dermatoses by modulating cytokine activity.</p><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of UPA compared with acitretin (ACI) in the acute phase of PPP through a prospective cohort study.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study was conducted at the Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital from August 2024 to January 2025. A total of 79 patients with acute PPP were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive UPA (15 mg daily) or ACI (20 mg daily) for 4 weeks. Efficacy was assessed using pustule counts, Palmoplantar Pustulosis Area and Severity Index (PPPASI), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Safety was evaluated by recording adverse events (AEs).</p><h3>Results</h3><p>At week 2, the rate of complete pustule clearance was significantly higher in the UPA group (41.9%) than in the ACI group (10.5%, <i>P</i> = 0.003). By week 4, all patients in the UPA group achieved a pustule count &lt; 30, compared with 63.2% in the ACI group. The UPA group also showed greater reductions in PPPASI and higher response rates for PPPASI 50/75/90. Quality of life improvements, as measured by DLQI, were more pronounced in the UPA group. In terms of safety, UPA had a favorable profile with lower overall AE incidence compared with ACI.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>UPA demonstrated superior efficacy over ACI in rapidly clearing pustules and improving skin lesions and quality of life in acute PPP episodes. The findings suggest that JAK1 inhibition may be a promising therapeutic approach for PPP, warranting further investigation in larger trials.</p><h3>Clinical Trial Registration</h3><p> [www.chictr.org.cn], identifier [ChiCTR2000036186].</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7706,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology","volume":"26 5","pages":"843 - 850"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Upadacitinib Versus Acitretin for the Resolution of Pustules in Palmoplantar Pustulosis During Acute Phase: A Single-Center, Open-Label Prospective Cohort Study\",\"authors\":\"Dawei Huang,&nbsp;Xingyu Jiang,&nbsp;Nan Yang,&nbsp;Yu Wang,&nbsp;Ying Li,&nbsp;Xuemei Yi,&nbsp;Chunyuan Guo,&nbsp;Yunlu Gao,&nbsp;Yuling Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40257-025-00971-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by recurrent pustules on the palms and soles. Current treatments, including topical medications, phototherapy, and systemic therapies, often show limited efficacy. Upadacitinib (UPA), a selective JAK1 inhibitor, has shown potential in treating neutrophilic dermatoses by modulating cytokine activity.</p><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of UPA compared with acitretin (ACI) in the acute phase of PPP through a prospective cohort study.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study was conducted at the Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital from August 2024 to January 2025. A total of 79 patients with acute PPP were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive UPA (15 mg daily) or ACI (20 mg daily) for 4 weeks. Efficacy was assessed using pustule counts, Palmoplantar Pustulosis Area and Severity Index (PPPASI), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Safety was evaluated by recording adverse events (AEs).</p><h3>Results</h3><p>At week 2, the rate of complete pustule clearance was significantly higher in the UPA group (41.9%) than in the ACI group (10.5%, <i>P</i> = 0.003). By week 4, all patients in the UPA group achieved a pustule count &lt; 30, compared with 63.2% in the ACI group. The UPA group also showed greater reductions in PPPASI and higher response rates for PPPASI 50/75/90. Quality of life improvements, as measured by DLQI, were more pronounced in the UPA group. In terms of safety, UPA had a favorable profile with lower overall AE incidence compared with ACI.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>UPA demonstrated superior efficacy over ACI in rapidly clearing pustules and improving skin lesions and quality of life in acute PPP episodes. The findings suggest that JAK1 inhibition may be a promising therapeutic approach for PPP, warranting further investigation in larger trials.</p><h3>Clinical Trial Registration</h3><p> [www.chictr.org.cn], identifier [ChiCTR2000036186].</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology\",\"volume\":\"26 5\",\"pages\":\"843 - 850\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40257-025-00971-7\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40257-025-00971-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:掌跖脓疱病(PPP)是一种慢性炎症性皮肤病,其特征是手掌和脚底反复出现脓疱。目前的治疗方法,包括局部药物治疗、光疗和全身治疗,通常疗效有限。Upadacitinib (UPA)是一种选择性JAK1抑制剂,已显示出通过调节细胞因子活性治疗中性粒细胞皮肤病的潜力。目的:通过前瞻性队列研究,比较UPA与ACI在PPP急性期的疗效和安全性。方法:本研究于2024年8月至2025年1月在上海皮肤病医院进行。共有79名急性PPP患者入组,随机分配接受UPA(每天15毫克)或ACI(每天20毫克)治疗4周。采用脓疱计数、掌足底脓疱面积及严重程度指数(PPPASI)和皮肤病生活质量指数(DLQI)评价疗效。通过记录不良事件(ae)来评估安全性。结果:第2周时,UPA组的脓疱完全清除率(41.9%)明显高于ACI组(10.5%,P = 0.003)。到第4周,UPA组所有患者的脓疱计数均< 30,而ACI组为63.2%。UPA组也显示PPPASI降低幅度更大,PPPASI 50/75/90的有效率更高。以DLQI衡量的生活质量改善在UPA组中更为明显。在安全性方面,与ACI相比,UPA具有较低的AE总发生率。结论:UPA在快速清除脓疱,改善急性PPP发作的皮肤病变和生活质量方面优于ACI。研究结果表明JAK1抑制可能是治疗PPP的一种很有希望的方法,值得在更大规模的试验中进一步研究。临床试验注册:[www.chictr.org.cn],标识符[ChiCTR2000036186]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Upadacitinib Versus Acitretin for the Resolution of Pustules in Palmoplantar Pustulosis During Acute Phase: A Single-Center, Open-Label Prospective Cohort Study

Upadacitinib Versus Acitretin for the Resolution of Pustules in Palmoplantar Pustulosis During Acute Phase: A Single-Center, Open-Label Prospective Cohort Study

Upadacitinib Versus Acitretin for the Resolution of Pustules in Palmoplantar Pustulosis During Acute Phase: A Single-Center, Open-Label Prospective Cohort Study

Background

Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by recurrent pustules on the palms and soles. Current treatments, including topical medications, phototherapy, and systemic therapies, often show limited efficacy. Upadacitinib (UPA), a selective JAK1 inhibitor, has shown potential in treating neutrophilic dermatoses by modulating cytokine activity.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of UPA compared with acitretin (ACI) in the acute phase of PPP through a prospective cohort study.

Methods

This study was conducted at the Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital from August 2024 to January 2025. A total of 79 patients with acute PPP were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive UPA (15 mg daily) or ACI (20 mg daily) for 4 weeks. Efficacy was assessed using pustule counts, Palmoplantar Pustulosis Area and Severity Index (PPPASI), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Safety was evaluated by recording adverse events (AEs).

Results

At week 2, the rate of complete pustule clearance was significantly higher in the UPA group (41.9%) than in the ACI group (10.5%, P = 0.003). By week 4, all patients in the UPA group achieved a pustule count < 30, compared with 63.2% in the ACI group. The UPA group also showed greater reductions in PPPASI and higher response rates for PPPASI 50/75/90. Quality of life improvements, as measured by DLQI, were more pronounced in the UPA group. In terms of safety, UPA had a favorable profile with lower overall AE incidence compared with ACI.

Conclusions

UPA demonstrated superior efficacy over ACI in rapidly clearing pustules and improving skin lesions and quality of life in acute PPP episodes. The findings suggest that JAK1 inhibition may be a promising therapeutic approach for PPP, warranting further investigation in larger trials.

Clinical Trial Registration

[www.chictr.org.cn], identifier [ChiCTR2000036186].

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
2.70%
发文量
84
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Clinical Dermatology is dedicated to evidence-based therapy and effective patient management in dermatology. It publishes critical review articles and clinically focused original research covering comprehensive aspects of dermatological conditions. The journal enhances visibility and educational value through features like Key Points summaries, plain language summaries, and various digital elements, ensuring accessibility and depth for a diverse readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信