通过将技术能力与虚拟世界中的游戏化相结合,创造存在的真实性体验:一个可视性视角

IF 10.1 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
Xinyu Jiang , Junbin Wang , Nianqi Deng
{"title":"通过将技术能力与虚拟世界中的游戏化相结合,创造存在的真实性体验:一个可视性视角","authors":"Xinyu Jiang ,&nbsp;Junbin Wang ,&nbsp;Nianqi Deng","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Games play a pivotal role in the strategic development of the metaverse. However, how gamified metaverse environments align with users' experiential needs remains unclear. Understanding the antecedents and internal responses that shape users’ intentions to engage with gamified metaverse platforms is critical for advancing the field. Grounded in affordance theory, this study empirically examines the interplay among technological capabilities, gamified interfaces, and user engagement, and explores their influence on existential authenticity, appraisal processes, and usage intention. Data from 314 participants were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Results indicate that both technological affordances (i.e., physical presence, social presence) and gamification affordances (i.e., achievement, identity, competition, self-expression) are effectively perceived by users. These affordances contribute to a sense of existential authenticity, which, in turn, drives both cognitive and affective appraisals. Ultimately, positive appraisals enhance users' intention to engage with the metaverse. Notably, affective appraisal significantly influences cognitive appraisal. These findings offer novel insights into the value drivers of gamified metaverse experiences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"83 ","pages":"Article 103019"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creating existential authenticity experience by combining technology capability with gamification in the metaverse: An affordance perspective\",\"authors\":\"Xinyu Jiang ,&nbsp;Junbin Wang ,&nbsp;Nianqi Deng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Games play a pivotal role in the strategic development of the metaverse. However, how gamified metaverse environments align with users' experiential needs remains unclear. Understanding the antecedents and internal responses that shape users’ intentions to engage with gamified metaverse platforms is critical for advancing the field. Grounded in affordance theory, this study empirically examines the interplay among technological capabilities, gamified interfaces, and user engagement, and explores their influence on existential authenticity, appraisal processes, and usage intention. Data from 314 participants were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Results indicate that both technological affordances (i.e., physical presence, social presence) and gamification affordances (i.e., achievement, identity, competition, self-expression) are effectively perceived by users. These affordances contribute to a sense of existential authenticity, which, in turn, drives both cognitive and affective appraisals. Ultimately, positive appraisals enhance users' intention to engage with the metaverse. Notably, affective appraisal significantly influences cognitive appraisal. These findings offer novel insights into the value drivers of gamified metaverse experiences.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology in Society\",\"volume\":\"83 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103019\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology in Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X2500209X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X2500209X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

游戏在虚拟世界的战略发展中扮演着关键角色。然而,游戏化的虚拟环境如何与用户的体验需求保持一致仍然不清楚。理解影响用户参与游戏化虚拟世界平台意图的前因和内部反应,对于推动该领域的发展至关重要。本研究以可视性理论为基础,实证研究了技术能力、游戏化界面和用户参与之间的相互作用,并探讨了它们对存在真实性、评估过程和使用意图的影响。采用偏最小二乘结构方程模型(PLS-SEM)对314名参与者的数据进行了分析。结果表明,技术支持(即物理存在、社会存在)和游戏化支持(即成就、身份、竞争、自我表达)都能被用户有效感知。这些启示有助于产生存在的真实感,而真实感反过来又推动认知和情感评价。最终,积极的评价会增强用户参与虚拟世界的意愿。值得注意的是,情感评价显著影响认知评价。这些发现为游戏化虚拟世界体验的价值驱动因素提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Creating existential authenticity experience by combining technology capability with gamification in the metaverse: An affordance perspective
Games play a pivotal role in the strategic development of the metaverse. However, how gamified metaverse environments align with users' experiential needs remains unclear. Understanding the antecedents and internal responses that shape users’ intentions to engage with gamified metaverse platforms is critical for advancing the field. Grounded in affordance theory, this study empirically examines the interplay among technological capabilities, gamified interfaces, and user engagement, and explores their influence on existential authenticity, appraisal processes, and usage intention. Data from 314 participants were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Results indicate that both technological affordances (i.e., physical presence, social presence) and gamification affordances (i.e., achievement, identity, competition, self-expression) are effectively perceived by users. These affordances contribute to a sense of existential authenticity, which, in turn, drives both cognitive and affective appraisals. Ultimately, positive appraisals enhance users' intention to engage with the metaverse. Notably, affective appraisal significantly influences cognitive appraisal. These findings offer novel insights into the value drivers of gamified metaverse experiences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信