放射肿瘤学中的人工智能:重塑训练,保持批判性思维

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Lucien Lahmi , Jean-Emmanuel Bibault , Yannis Constantinides , Joseph Azria , Véronique Cheval , Catherine Dejean , Catherine Durdux , Angélique Ducteil , Alexandre Escande , Cédric Gesbert , Thibaud Haaser , Gabriel Kobeissi , Claire Lemanski , Moshe Nataf , Charles Raynaud , Sébastien Thureau , Jean-Léon Lagrange , Florence Huguet , Commission éthique de la Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO)
{"title":"放射肿瘤学中的人工智能:重塑训练,保持批判性思维","authors":"Lucien Lahmi ,&nbsp;Jean-Emmanuel Bibault ,&nbsp;Yannis Constantinides ,&nbsp;Joseph Azria ,&nbsp;Véronique Cheval ,&nbsp;Catherine Dejean ,&nbsp;Catherine Durdux ,&nbsp;Angélique Ducteil ,&nbsp;Alexandre Escande ,&nbsp;Cédric Gesbert ,&nbsp;Thibaud Haaser ,&nbsp;Gabriel Kobeissi ,&nbsp;Claire Lemanski ,&nbsp;Moshe Nataf ,&nbsp;Charles Raynaud ,&nbsp;Sébastien Thureau ,&nbsp;Jean-Léon Lagrange ,&nbsp;Florence Huguet ,&nbsp;Commission éthique de la Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO)","doi":"10.1016/j.canrad.2025.104673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The growing integration of artificial intelligence is profoundly transforming radiation oncology, particularly through the automation of tasks such as target volume delineation. While artificial intelligence holds the promise of enhancing treatment efficiency and accuracy, it also raises significant ethical and educational concerns: How can we preserve core clinical skills? How can we transmit expertise that is now less frequently practiced? How can we ensure truly informed patient consent in the face of automated systems? And finally, how should we use the time freed up by automation? To address these challenges, medical training must increasingly incorporate critical thinking and algorithmic literacy. The caregiver–patient relationship must remain central, with medical decisions remaining under human responsibility. Artificial intelligence should thus remain a tool in the hands of physicians, not a substitute for clinical judgment. Ethical reflection must accompany every step of artificial intelligence implementation, ensuring its integration is thoughtful, responsible, and human-centred.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9504,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Radiotherapie","volume":"29 5","pages":"Article 104673"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intelligence artificielle en oncologie radiothérapie : réinventer la formation et préserver l’esprit critique\",\"authors\":\"Lucien Lahmi ,&nbsp;Jean-Emmanuel Bibault ,&nbsp;Yannis Constantinides ,&nbsp;Joseph Azria ,&nbsp;Véronique Cheval ,&nbsp;Catherine Dejean ,&nbsp;Catherine Durdux ,&nbsp;Angélique Ducteil ,&nbsp;Alexandre Escande ,&nbsp;Cédric Gesbert ,&nbsp;Thibaud Haaser ,&nbsp;Gabriel Kobeissi ,&nbsp;Claire Lemanski ,&nbsp;Moshe Nataf ,&nbsp;Charles Raynaud ,&nbsp;Sébastien Thureau ,&nbsp;Jean-Léon Lagrange ,&nbsp;Florence Huguet ,&nbsp;Commission éthique de la Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.canrad.2025.104673\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The growing integration of artificial intelligence is profoundly transforming radiation oncology, particularly through the automation of tasks such as target volume delineation. While artificial intelligence holds the promise of enhancing treatment efficiency and accuracy, it also raises significant ethical and educational concerns: How can we preserve core clinical skills? How can we transmit expertise that is now less frequently practiced? How can we ensure truly informed patient consent in the face of automated systems? And finally, how should we use the time freed up by automation? To address these challenges, medical training must increasingly incorporate critical thinking and algorithmic literacy. The caregiver–patient relationship must remain central, with medical decisions remaining under human responsibility. Artificial intelligence should thus remain a tool in the hands of physicians, not a substitute for clinical judgment. Ethical reflection must accompany every step of artificial intelligence implementation, ensuring its integration is thoughtful, responsible, and human-centred.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Radiotherapie\",\"volume\":\"29 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 104673\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Radiotherapie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1278321825000897\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Radiotherapie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1278321825000897","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能的日益融合正在深刻地改变放射肿瘤学,特别是通过目标体积描绘等任务的自动化。虽然人工智能有望提高治疗效率和准确性,但它也引发了重大的伦理和教育问题:我们如何才能保留核心临床技能?我们怎样才能传播那些现在很少被实践的专业知识呢?面对自动化系统,我们如何确保真正知情的患者同意?最后,我们应该如何利用自动化带来的时间?为了应对这些挑战,医学培训必须越来越多地纳入批判性思维和算法素养。照顾者与病人的关系必须保持核心地位,医疗决定仍然由人类负责。因此,人工智能应该仍然是医生手中的工具,而不是临床判断的替代品。伦理反思必须伴随着人工智能实施的每一步,确保其整合是深思熟虑的、负责任的、以人为本的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intelligence artificielle en oncologie radiothérapie : réinventer la formation et préserver l’esprit critique
The growing integration of artificial intelligence is profoundly transforming radiation oncology, particularly through the automation of tasks such as target volume delineation. While artificial intelligence holds the promise of enhancing treatment efficiency and accuracy, it also raises significant ethical and educational concerns: How can we preserve core clinical skills? How can we transmit expertise that is now less frequently practiced? How can we ensure truly informed patient consent in the face of automated systems? And finally, how should we use the time freed up by automation? To address these challenges, medical training must increasingly incorporate critical thinking and algorithmic literacy. The caregiver–patient relationship must remain central, with medical decisions remaining under human responsibility. Artificial intelligence should thus remain a tool in the hands of physicians, not a substitute for clinical judgment. Ethical reflection must accompany every step of artificial intelligence implementation, ensuring its integration is thoughtful, responsible, and human-centred.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Radiotherapie
Cancer Radiotherapie 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
23.10%
发文量
129
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Cancer/radiothérapie se veut d''abord et avant tout un organe francophone de publication des travaux de recherche en radiothérapie. La revue a pour objectif de diffuser les informations majeures sur les travaux de recherche en cancérologie et tout ce qui touche de près ou de loin au traitement du cancer par les radiations : technologie, radiophysique, radiobiologie et radiothérapie clinique.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信