Lucien Lahmi , Jean-Emmanuel Bibault , Yannis Constantinides , Joseph Azria , Véronique Cheval , Catherine Dejean , Catherine Durdux , Angélique Ducteil , Alexandre Escande , Cédric Gesbert , Thibaud Haaser , Gabriel Kobeissi , Claire Lemanski , Moshe Nataf , Charles Raynaud , Sébastien Thureau , Jean-Léon Lagrange , Florence Huguet , Commission éthique de la Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO)
{"title":"放射肿瘤学中的人工智能:重塑训练,保持批判性思维","authors":"Lucien Lahmi , Jean-Emmanuel Bibault , Yannis Constantinides , Joseph Azria , Véronique Cheval , Catherine Dejean , Catherine Durdux , Angélique Ducteil , Alexandre Escande , Cédric Gesbert , Thibaud Haaser , Gabriel Kobeissi , Claire Lemanski , Moshe Nataf , Charles Raynaud , Sébastien Thureau , Jean-Léon Lagrange , Florence Huguet , Commission éthique de la Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO)","doi":"10.1016/j.canrad.2025.104673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The growing integration of artificial intelligence is profoundly transforming radiation oncology, particularly through the automation of tasks such as target volume delineation. While artificial intelligence holds the promise of enhancing treatment efficiency and accuracy, it also raises significant ethical and educational concerns: How can we preserve core clinical skills? How can we transmit expertise that is now less frequently practiced? How can we ensure truly informed patient consent in the face of automated systems? And finally, how should we use the time freed up by automation? To address these challenges, medical training must increasingly incorporate critical thinking and algorithmic literacy. The caregiver–patient relationship must remain central, with medical decisions remaining under human responsibility. Artificial intelligence should thus remain a tool in the hands of physicians, not a substitute for clinical judgment. Ethical reflection must accompany every step of artificial intelligence implementation, ensuring its integration is thoughtful, responsible, and human-centred.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9504,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Radiotherapie","volume":"29 5","pages":"Article 104673"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intelligence artificielle en oncologie radiothérapie : réinventer la formation et préserver l’esprit critique\",\"authors\":\"Lucien Lahmi , Jean-Emmanuel Bibault , Yannis Constantinides , Joseph Azria , Véronique Cheval , Catherine Dejean , Catherine Durdux , Angélique Ducteil , Alexandre Escande , Cédric Gesbert , Thibaud Haaser , Gabriel Kobeissi , Claire Lemanski , Moshe Nataf , Charles Raynaud , Sébastien Thureau , Jean-Léon Lagrange , Florence Huguet , Commission éthique de la Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.canrad.2025.104673\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The growing integration of artificial intelligence is profoundly transforming radiation oncology, particularly through the automation of tasks such as target volume delineation. While artificial intelligence holds the promise of enhancing treatment efficiency and accuracy, it also raises significant ethical and educational concerns: How can we preserve core clinical skills? How can we transmit expertise that is now less frequently practiced? How can we ensure truly informed patient consent in the face of automated systems? And finally, how should we use the time freed up by automation? To address these challenges, medical training must increasingly incorporate critical thinking and algorithmic literacy. The caregiver–patient relationship must remain central, with medical decisions remaining under human responsibility. Artificial intelligence should thus remain a tool in the hands of physicians, not a substitute for clinical judgment. Ethical reflection must accompany every step of artificial intelligence implementation, ensuring its integration is thoughtful, responsible, and human-centred.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Radiotherapie\",\"volume\":\"29 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 104673\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Radiotherapie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1278321825000897\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Radiotherapie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1278321825000897","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Intelligence artificielle en oncologie radiothérapie : réinventer la formation et préserver l’esprit critique
The growing integration of artificial intelligence is profoundly transforming radiation oncology, particularly through the automation of tasks such as target volume delineation. While artificial intelligence holds the promise of enhancing treatment efficiency and accuracy, it also raises significant ethical and educational concerns: How can we preserve core clinical skills? How can we transmit expertise that is now less frequently practiced? How can we ensure truly informed patient consent in the face of automated systems? And finally, how should we use the time freed up by automation? To address these challenges, medical training must increasingly incorporate critical thinking and algorithmic literacy. The caregiver–patient relationship must remain central, with medical decisions remaining under human responsibility. Artificial intelligence should thus remain a tool in the hands of physicians, not a substitute for clinical judgment. Ethical reflection must accompany every step of artificial intelligence implementation, ensuring its integration is thoughtful, responsible, and human-centred.
期刊介绍:
Cancer/radiothérapie se veut d''abord et avant tout un organe francophone de publication des travaux de recherche en radiothérapie. La revue a pour objectif de diffuser les informations majeures sur les travaux de recherche en cancérologie et tout ce qui touche de près ou de loin au traitement du cancer par les radiations : technologie, radiophysique, radiobiologie et radiothérapie clinique.